ipl-logo

Essay On International Criminal Court

1095 Words5 Pages

In order to enhance and bring to fruition the modern, Kantian model of international communisty, International Criminal Court is formed. The international criminal court is the first permanent, general, future oriented court that is based on the general principle of law equality before the law, equal law for all’ and is not imposed by powerful states, or by Security Council. Hence, it is established as a permanent truly international court to respond to the most serious international crimes and to overcome the limitations of the ad hoc tribunal. Besides, it serves as a practical and symbolic articulation of the scheme and a powerful push to its full realization. International Criminal Court plays an important role in reducing impunity and upholding the rule of law. It acts as a criminal court, watchdog court, world security court, reparations court and law maker. In our discussion, we will discuss in details of the role of ICC.
It is an undisputed fact that ICC acted as a criminal court. In the Declaration adopted at the meeting, States recognized "the role of the International Criminal Court in a multilateral system that aims to end impunity and establish the rule of law”. Having the role as criminal court, it acts on the individual level and communicates vis-a-vis each and every human being as address of the international criminal law …show more content…

By referring to the historical background of ICC, it is established for the purpose of complimentary and this complimentary principle has indirectly forced the states to comply with their international obligation to involve in investigation, prosecute and to punish the offender of international crimes. Failure to do so amounts to failure to perform their international obligation which would then be condemned by other states and international community. By supervening the act of national courts, impunity would reduce gradually and as a result, preventing the occurring of international

Show More
Related

  • The Case Of Lindy Chamberlain

    2102 Words  | 9 Pages

    The source examines the impact of victims being wrongfully convicted and imprisoned, and the international approach to the issue. Australia has signed the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) signed by the Australian government in 1972, which states once a person has been wrongfully convicted and they have received a punishment, by law they are entitled to compensation unless its proved there is an unknown fact which has arisen. However, this was never adopted into Australian law, as a result any individual wrongfully convicted and imprisoned isn’t entitled to any compensation under Australian law. Australia’s commitments to signing this is that all states and territories must meet their obligations under article 14 (6) which are incorporation of the domestic article into domestic legislation to ensure a legal right to compensation. Though a state or territory government does have the ability to make an ex gratia payment to a wrongfully convicted individual through a request or their own doing.

    Read More

  • What Is The Legacy Of The Nuremberg Trials: Pros And Answers

    3979 Words  | 16 Pages

    I. INTRODUCTION On 8th August, 1945, shortly after the end of World War II in May of 1945, the Allied governments entered into a joint agreement establishing the International Military Tribunal for the purpose of trying those responsible for the war atrocities. Whereas some 5,000 Nazi’s were charged with war crimes, the Nuremberg trials were designed specifically to prosecute high ranking Nazi officials with whom the authority for the commission of heinous atrocities rested. The Nuremberg Trials would therefore be marked in history as one of its kind.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of International Criminal Law

    977 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Rome statute builds on two major assumptions. The first is that, international crimes must not go unpunished and the second is that the crimes should preferably be prosecuted at the national level. The two assumptions reflect the respective purposes of the Rome statute and at the same time these purposes can also be seen as parts of superior purposes, including the preservation of international peace and security and the safeguard of state sovereignty. Understanding the purposes might clarify the role that the ICC should play and thus indicate how the authority to interfere should be

    Read More

  • The ICJ: Permanent Court Of International Justice

    10420 Words  | 42 Pages

    The International Court of Justice reflects western tradition of dispute resolution while at the same time nations had grown into different sorts of culture 6. It is argued that the International Court of Justice suffers from structural deficiencies. Many newly independent states argue that the traditional international law is biased towards European and American states 7. The ICJ is also criticized on the basis of customary law.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Criminal Accountability

    715 Words  | 3 Pages

    Criminal accountability refers to the responsibility taken for one 's actions when a crime is committed, these crimes may include sexual abuses, theft and murder. Accountability is intended to make sure every crime is taken under prosecution to maintain peace and equality in the country, however, the accountability of one that works within the UN body or with the government remains unclear due to many factors such as immunity, which exempts the criminal from being punished for the crimes they have committed. This is a major problem as it is biased and lacks justice to the violated victims, therefore, it must be taken under extreme deliberation in order to bring peace and exclude discrimination. Iraq has taken extreme care to amend and implement

    Read More

  • Criminal Justice System Essay

    721 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are three components that make up the criminal justice system – the police, courts, and correctional facilities – they all work together in order to protect individuals and their rights as a citizen of society to live without the fear of becoming the victim of a crime. Crime, simply put is when a person violates criminal law; the criminal justice system is society’s way of implementing social control. When all three components of the criminal justice work together, it functions almost perfectly. For a person to enter the criminal justice system, the process must begin with the law enforcement.

    Read More

  • Central Instrumental Justice Theory: Purpose Of Criminal Law

    371 Words  | 2 Pages

    A central instrumental justice theory and an explanation behind the purpose of criminal law is incapacitation, which is a reductivist reasoning of punishment. Utilitarianism, a theory of moral reasoning, forms the basis of reductivism and represents that an act will be considered as justified and reasonable if the consequences of such occurrence are to the benefit to majority population (Millie, 2014). Furthermore, this justifies that if the pain or suffering inflicted on an individual during a period of punishment is beneficiary to society, as it prevents the offender from committing future crimes. Thus, in accordance to the Incapacitation theory, the nature of the offender does not concern the punishment, as in an opposing case with rehabilitation,

    Read More

  • The Three Types Of Jurisdiction In International Law

    1797 Words  | 8 Pages

    Introduction According to Bledsoe and Bozcek in their book, the International Law Dictionary, state jurisdiction is the capacity of a State under International Law to prescribe and enforce the rules of law. It is derived from the State sovereignty and constitutes its vital and central feature. In other words Jurisdiction is the authority state has over individuals, property and actions which happen within its sovereign territorial area (whether it is its land, its national airspace, its internal and territorial water, or even its national vessels) therefore giving state the right to stipulate laws, impose them and to adjudge the proceeding of it. Jurisdiction (or state Jurisdiction) is a quite versatile term in International Law, as there are actually three types of jurisdiction held by state.

    Read More

  • Essay On Monism Vs Dualism

    1225 Words  | 5 Pages

    There are reasons for this, first is that, internal implementation of international law is always conditioned by a rule of the state’s municipal law. Clearly stating that international law’ internal interpretation is always governed by the municipal constitution. Second is that in national courts, even a monist country, their courts may fail sometimes to execute treaties which are binding under international law. United State law is an example of non-self-executing treaty. While dualist country’s courts, unincorporated treaties are given limited effect on the internal process.

    Read More

  • Judicial Council Essay

    1187 Words  | 5 Pages

    3.4Judicial Council In General, Judicial councils are bodies that are designed to insulate the functions of appointment, promotion and discipline of judges while ensuring some level of accountability . Brazil’s first judicial council was created in 1977. The primary function of the council was merely disciplinary in nature and had no financial or budgetary functions. The 1977 version of Council was able to do little about the political military influence within the court.

    Read More

  • Challenges Of Globalization And Law

    1644 Words  | 7 Pages

    Focus can also be drawn towards the growing advocacy of courts in handling political conflicts and restructuring economies. In recent years, legal scholars, political scientists and social scientists in Western countries have explored the trend of ‘judicial internationalization’, meaning the increased interaction between judges from different jurisdictions around the world . It has been suggested that courts, in particular the

    Read More

  • Examples Of Arguments Against Ravisia

    967 Words  | 4 Pages

    Speech of Respondent: • The first issue before the Court is, if Ravisia state violated international law during the presence of military forces in Alicanto. The answer to this question is “NO” for following reasons: Your Excellency, before we give concrete examples of why Ravisia’s troop presence on territory of Alicanto is legally, I would like to draw your attention to the fact, when Alicanto police have admitted their inability to eliminate the illegal actions of their own country. During this time, the area of Alicanto and Benuu has become repeatedly an area of controversy, where were a number of violent acts, terror and mass violation of human rights and fundamental freedoms, the death of civilians, there were signs of ethnic cleansing. Your Excellency, Alicanto not only failed to ensure implementation resolution number 5440, passed by UN security council, but the situation was getting worse day by day. Alicanto failed to ensure fulfillment of the obligations regarding the protection of human rights.

    Read More

  • Nuremberg Trial Analysis

    1015 Words  | 5 Pages

    THE NUREMBERG AND TOKYO TRIBUNALS The two tribunals expressed the principle that International Law may impose obligations directly upon individuals. As observed by the Nuremberg tribunal following the second World War ‘Crimes against International Law are committed by men and NOT by Abstract entities and therefore only by punishing individuals who commit such crimes can the provisions of International Law be enforced’. THE NUREMBERG TRIBUNAL Despite this early use of the term, the first prosecutions for crimes against humanity took place after the Second World War in 1945 before the International Military Tribunal (IMT) at Nuremberg.

    Read More

  • Importance Of Humanitarian Law

    1135 Words  | 5 Pages

    Regarding the war crimes, this principle was known gradually as customary international law and has been recognized in the code lieber and directives of Oxford and it has been repeated later in the treaties of international humanitarian law. According to the constitutions of the International Military Tribunals at Nuremberg and Tokyo and so on, individual criminal responsibility for war crimes was considered as the basis of prosecutions. And many of the suspects of war crimes were tried on the basis of the principle. The given principle was also approved based on the official statements and the reported procedures and has been referred in many Security Council resolutions and has been known as a customary rule of applicable international law in the states '

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Transnational Crimes

    932 Words  | 4 Pages

    TRANSNATIONAL CRIME Transnational crimes are crimes that have actual or potential effect across national borders and crimes that are intrastate but offend fundamental values of the international community. Transnational crimes also include crimes that take place in one country, but their consequences significantly affect another country and transit countries may also be involved. Examples of transnational crimes include: human trafficking, people smuggling and smuggling/trafficking of goods (such as arms trafficking and drug trade). It is a serious global concern that has the potential to seriously endanger the stability and security of nations as well as threaten international peace. Therefore, the fight against transnational organized crime must be done comprehensively.

    Read More

More about Essay On International Criminal Court

Open Document