Theory Of Justice Analysis

Theory of Justice Analysis

A person’s actions and consequences of those behaviors may not only affects self but also have effects on the lives of others. Depending on the ultimate goal of a person’s activities and the type of activities, the ethics of such actions may be geared either towards addressing the actions or towards addressing the outcomes of these actions. Based on the intentions and outcomes of the ethical guidelines they provide, there are four primary classes of ethics including relativism, virtue ethics, deontology, and consequentialism (Tilley, 2005). Rawls’ Theory of Justice aims at overcoming the shortcomings of virtue, consequence, duty, and relativism brought about by other ethical approaches by eliminating various factors

For decisions on the distribution of resources to be made, Rawls first assumed decision-makers to be in an original position in which they had self-ignorance of their position in society that results from their decision. This way, people could never tailor their decisions and actions to favor themselves since they do not have prior knowledge of where they would end up in the socioeconomic hierarchy. Lack of awareness of one’s position would result in making decisions fair to everyone. Since economic and social advantages would be distributed without the intention of putting anyone at a disadvantage (Cehan, OPREA, Gavrilovici, & Manea, 2013). Although, agreements made by people in the original position are both historical and hypothetical, the Theory of Justice can act as a guide in a society that pursues equality, whereby inequality is only acceptable if it is to the benefit of the underprivileged.

Principles of the Theory of Justice

Rawls Theory of Justice is guided by two primary guiding principles that are derived from the very workings of the theory including (Sen, 2006).

The First Principle of

Protection of fundamental rights and properties of every individual prevents society from turning into a disorderly system. Justice in the modern criminal justice system differs from security in terms of the approaches, but the aims are always similar; maintaining a socially coherent system (Tomkins, 2014). If the security system were not kept in place, all people would seem to be living in an anarchist society, which does not uphold morality as a necessity towards the survival of human beings. Putting up security measures in place, ensuring that violence and crime does not take place will determine and guarantee that all people uphold individual human rights. It is worth noting that the development of a crime and violence-free society is one of the greatest measure that would go a long way in addressing personal and society freedom (Christoph,