Les Miserables, by Victor Hugo, is a tale of the poor who suffer throughout their lives. The novel can be looked at in many different viewpoints, specifically, in the way the characters can be seen. Each one has their own personality and own story, yet, in a way they are not so different. Each one goes through something and deals with some sort of pain or suffering. Throughout the novel, as each character is introduced such as Javert, Fantine, and Jean Valjean, we find that no one character is more sacrificial or more resilient than the other. One protagonist, by the name of Javert, sacrificed everything he believed in and himself just for his enemy. In the novel, Javert has been on a pursuit to find a man named Jean Valjean. Valjean who …show more content…
Fantine, a young girl in the novel, has a child out of wedlock named Cosette. However, Fantine is not fit to support her daughter, so she has to make the biggest sacrifice any mother can make— giving up Cosette to live with the Thenaradiers in hope that she’ll have a better and more successful life. In the meantime, Fantine works fifteen hours a day to support Cosette, but unfortunately, her status of being an unwed mother is revealed causing Fantine to be let go from her job. Soon, “She could not earn enough and her debts grew. The Thénardiers bombarded her with letters, heartrending in tone and ominous in their exactions” (Hugo) forcing Fantine to sacrifice everything she had—the little amount she had left for money, her hair, and her teeth. Eventually, it came to a point where Fantine said, “Well…I may as well sell the rest” (Hugo), meaning prostitution. She gave up her entire self, for the happiness of her daughter, and through it all, Fantine showed resiliency. In the novel, she battles through the circumstances that she endures and overcomes them when her rescuer, Valjean, liberates her from
Through diction, the novel Is portraying how cruelty can affect individuals but also a society in many ways. it also shows, even when there is Extreme cruelty, compassion and Humanity will continue to be illuminated and shine through. The unique wording in this novel is what makes it so special. intricate phrases show the different levels of
The attitude of the novel is varying, and as expected of any good novel, there are many different parts, with the ability to provoke a myriad of profound emotions. In the first third of the novel, the reader is just beginning to acquaint themselves with the different characters. Furthermore, the abrupt changes in setting could give even the most placid individual whiplash. The main feeling that comes across is empathy. The Parisian people are living in the most destitute conditions with nothing to eat and no place to escape to.
In addition, both plots offer escapes from the lower class; however, only Lola chooses to take it. These two texts are also common because of the attributes of the protagonists in relation to stereotypical gender roles. In both sources, Antoinette and Gigi, are defensive about their own actions as they feel as they are being judged by others and they are strong yet nurturing as they both have sickly mothers and younger girls to look after and provide for. Marie and Lola play the submissive and irrational roles as they are presented as naive and learning from their own mistakes and have to suffer the punishment from Antoinette and Gigi. Since Marie and Lola develop most throughout their respective texts, it is evident that they both fail to learn from the wise words and poor decisions of their elders.
Jean Laffite’s early life was much like other peoples. He was a very ordinary child with average working parents. He was born in 1790 in the beautiful and glorious city of Bayonne, France. The only extraordinary aspect of his life was that he grew up with a family of ten children in the south by the Adour river. Could you ever imagine waking up to ten rambunctious little rascals every morning?
In doing so, she eliminates the threat of Beauplaisir ruining her reputation because if he were to brag about this affair, it would be impossible to associate a character like Fantomina, who is expected to become a prostitute and pushed to the opposite side of the social spectrum, to the protagonist’s true and well-respected identity. When playing the low class Fantomina, the protagonist’s grip on her performance to attract Beauplaisir is the weakest. Beauplaisir was extremely direct and assertive when it came to sexual favors because he felt entitled and superior over Fantomina; therefore, the protagonist must play a different character who is more respected in this
In order to fully understand the story it must be evaluated to show what lesson is to be learned from the reading. The story has an epiphany implemented into the writing which gives a new realization in the importance of this part. A major evaluation to this short story is to fully understand the main characters in it. One significant character in this story is Louise.
He tries to forgive himself but he cannot, no matter how hard he tries. The heroic characteristics as well as the flaw leads him to be a tragic hero. On top of his road to self discovery he must deal with the ever declining social structure of the town. He tries to stand out as an honest resistor to the hangings, which ultimately leads to his
The central idea of the novel is self-sufficiency in shaping what is wanted in life, which is developed by key components throughout the novel. Jeanette’s relationships among her family member are intertwined with the events that occur throughout her life and the attitudes she presents to her family in times of hardship, fleshing out the central idea.
To Suffer or Not to Suffer As human beings, we try to eschew from the suffering and adversities that plague human morality. Nonetheless, society remains drawn to the surplus of tragedies in plays, movies, and literary works. Not only do these works provide an escape from our own hardships, but suffering and tragedy is a significant aspect to the development of human society. Personally, I have experienced my own share of sorrow, trauma, and difficulties in life. While they may not be as severe as those faced by the characters in A Doll’s House and Never Let Me Go, a pervasive theme still manifests in the presence of suffering.
Julie Taymor’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream film adaptation creates a fantastical spin on the well-known Shakespeare play. The director is able to create an effective dream-like setting with the use of projections, lighting, and puppetry. From the beginning, there is a sense of wonder created, as without word or introduction, Puck, played by Kathryn Hunter, glides onto stage and lays down on a mattress supported by branches. Puck is then lifted into the air and a large white sheet consumes the stage. Even for those familiar with the play, such as myself, it immediately commands your mind to travel to the dream world Taymor has created.
She plans to have her daughter and Beauplaisir marry, to save her daughter from dishonour, but he knows nothing. Rather, the mother sends her daughter to a monastery in France. The ending is interesting because it could mean a return to a Sapphic environment, as Catherine Ingrassa explains in her essay “‘Queering’ Eliza Haywood,” “Fantomina” herself retires to a convent at the end of the text, a strategic (re) turn to a feminocentric community which, Valerie Traub reminds us, may be one of ‘independence and intimacy’ as well as potentially ‘a site for erotic contact’”
After the death of his mother and his father’s absence, Rousseau met his second maternal figure, Miss Lamberciers, whose existence sparked a perverse nature from within him. After moving in with his uncle, Rousseau was sent to a village called Bossey to learn Latin from a local pastor named M. Lamberciers. While in his care, Rousseau met the pastor’s wife, Miss Lamberciers, who later became a type of mother figure for him. She would reprimand him when she felt necessary, and instead of regarding her punishments with anger, he began to experience them with sexual delight.
These show the societal roles of women at the time and that she experienced feminist oppression. Ultimately Desiree feels as if she has no value in her life. Armand fell out of
This essay will examine the historical accuracy of the film Les Miserables in terms of the social, economic and political conditions in French society post French Revolution. The film Les Miserables depicts an extremely interesting time in French history (from about 1815-1832.) Even though the story line does not depict every detail and event that occurred during the time period as well as the fact that some aspects are dramatized for entertainment purposes, the film effectively spans thirty years of economic, political and social aspects of French Society. However it also manages to bring in references to the past, the French Revolution (1789-1799) and the impact it had on the society portrayed in the film.
While unique characters are very valuable in various forms of literature, authors can successfully utilize stereotyped characters to achieve author’s purpose. The character of Mariane in Tartuffe by Molière is a stereotypical “damsel in distress”, as the other characters must help her while they combat the hypocrisy of Tartuffe. When Orgon, blinded by his reverence for Tartuffe, announces that Mariane is to marry Tartuffe, it causes conflict between characters. Mariane has to express her opinion and defy her father, so that she will not marry a hypocrite and liar, despite being a generally submissive person. In Molière’s Tartuffe, the author successfully employs a conventional character through Mariane, to demonstrate the strife that fanaticism and