Critical Analysis Of Romeo And Juliet

869 Words4 Pages
Hook- Romeo and Juliet are commonly prosecuted for being their own disasters of fate or is another unseen force working against the romantic couple?
Content- The couple was willing to die if their love be separated and coincidentally the two with the brightest burning love had to be separated by not only a household but a family feud that was spilling blood and had no reason for stopping
Reasns- A tsunami of redundant reasons for example the priest absurd plan, Juliet 's cling to stubbornness, and of course the family feud that dropped bodies and peoples will to live.
Thesis- Romeo and Jeuleit was wrote by william shakesepear and is belived to be an exellent play writter because he wrote about peopes decisions rather than fate making the terrible tradigy, but the amount of misfortune has to be argued as fate because if a sigle reason I listed was non existant Romeo and Juleit would be balls deep in love.
Body 1
P- Juleit is fairly golable and oblivous because she followed along with fryier lawence plan and put no effort twards edition that plan. One simple change and she could have been looking down on romeos grave.
I- fryier lawarence plan goes "The friar proposes a plan: Juliet must consent to marry Paris; then, on the night before the wedding, she must drink a sleeping potion that will make her appear to be dead; she will be laid to rest in the Capulet tomb, and the friar will send word to Romeo in Mantua to help him retrieve her when she wakes up."
E- this
Open Document