How has Critical Race theory shaped society's views of racial topics? Critical race theory (CRT) examines how race and racism are embedded in society and perpetuate inequalities for people of color. CRT emerged in the 1970s from the earlier work of civil rights scholars and activists who recognized that significant advances made in the 1960s, such as school desegregation and voting rights legislation, had stalled and substantial racial disparities remained. CRT argues that while overt individual racism has declined, institutional and structural racism still serves to privilege white people and limit opportunities for minorities, especially in key areas like education and economics. Educational inequities start early, with students of color …show more content…
For instance, she highlights studies critiquing the lack of diversity and white-centered frameworks in artificial intelligence. Lin offers suggestions for initiating anti-racist reforms tailored to each domain. She concludes by advocating for broader CRT engagement across disciplines and departments to pursue necessary structural changes. Lin provides a valuable model for understanding CRT's versatility in unveiling racism across higher education. Her analysis underscores the need to utilize CRT insights beyond traditional boundaries. The insights of critical race theory (CRT) are invaluable for advancing racial equity, and schools have a responsibility to integrate CRT into teaching and learning. As Judith C.P. Lin demonstrates in her article, racism adapts insidiously across institutions, hiding behind specialized language and practices that obscure structural discrimination. CRT serves as a powerful lens for exposing this "chameleon-like" racism, no matter the setting. Rather than avoid candid discussions of racism because they are uncomfortable, schools must lean into the discomfort. Openly teaching students about historical injustice, privilege, implicit bias, and systemic oppression is essential for creating a just society. Avoiding CRT means students lack the tools to recognize racism's evolving manifestations. Integrating CRT across disciplines provides students with the knowledge to challenge assumptions, disrupt inequities, and imagine radical alternatives. Critics argue CRT indoctrinates guilt or victimhood, but candid analyses of injustice need not do so. Instead, CRT equips students to think critically about their positions and capacities. Schools should ensure all students understand racism's roots in American society and institutions. Suppressing or ignoring CRT sustains racism. To pursue racial
By laying out all the different roles, structures, and policies that work to uphold White Supremacist beliefs in the educational field, it exposes the fallacy of a successful and equitable education system. In doing so, the authors demand educators to contend with their personal responsibility and accountability. It is not enough to be culturally responsive; educators must critically engage with the education system, acknowledge the barriers that exist due to structural racism, work together to demand structural change that contends with race, and maintain a critical perspective that fosters a “healthy skepticism” that is “inherently hopeful” (p. 300). The authors demonstrate their willingness to do just that throughout the entire chapter by continuously calling attention to systemic issues and providing hopeful alternatives and suggestions to the reader.
According to Delgado and Stefancic, the Critical Race Theory (CRT) is a
Imagine if the very fabric of our society was a tapestry woven with threads of inequality, and critical race theory was the magnifying glass that showed us every flaw and tear. Welcome to the uncomfortable truth about our justice system. Critical Race Theory also known as CRT is the racial biases in government institutions such as jails, courts, and juries. Critical Race Theory also applies in other institutions, such as the United States justice system. This also connects the author Elie Wiesel's purpose of bearing witness in their memoir "Night" where Wiesel bore witness to the Holocaust, this also applies to the 21st century and how people in the United States need to bear witness to the unfairness of the justice system to people of color.
CRT supporters use facts and evidence, such as statistics from the workplace and schools, to explain why CRT is needed in school systems today. CRT opposition believes that it can be harmful and divisive; the truth of CRT is that it is an essential tool for understanding and addressing systemic racism in American society. When reviewing the data regarding fundamental aspects of life such as education, healthcare, and employment, it is clear that people of color are severely worse off than white people. As unfortunate as it is, even an ethnic-sounding name, as opposed to a white-sounding name, can cause an employer to hire one over another. One of the sources I dove into was David Bell’s, “Who’s Afraid of Critical Race Theory”.
Furthermore, CRT's focus on systemic racism does not imply that white people are inherently racist or that people of color cannot be prejudiced against white people. Rather, CRT recognizes that racism operates on a systemic level and targets marginalized
Sawchuk (2021), an associate editor who writes on curriculum states, “The theory says that racism is part of everyday life, so people—white or nonwhite—who don’t intend to be racist can nevertheless make choices that fuel racism. CRT puts an emphasis on outcomes, not merely on individuals’ own beliefs, and it calls on these outcomes to be examined and rectified” (para. 14). Teh existence of white privilege and systematic racism is not a matter of opinion; it is a clear and undeniable fact that has been showcased by lived experience and cannot be denied. The point of CRT is to expose the racial injustices within America’s system and to help amend these perceptions on people of
Critical race theory (or CRT) should not be taught to anyone from the grades of K-12. Many would have the citizens of America believing that the US is “systemically racist” and that we are, as a people, irredeemable in our ways, but that just isn’t true. The other side of this argument would like to tell every non-minority student that they are a part of the problem, but hardly seem to back up their claims with any factual evidence. Critical race theory, once called “critical theory”, was the Marxist doctrine that formed the basis of communism that would have even me, a white person, believe I’m a victim. Critical race theory is not the path towards a better and more equitable future, but really a means to a divided and hostile country that
In recent years, there has been intense controversy and debate regarding the implementation of the Critical Race Theory in schools. Putting this pressure onto teachers to execute a lesson for students to teach them about Critical Race Theory is ridiculous because we wouldn’t even know if the teacher is teaching it properly. If the lesson isn’t taught properly, it completely defeats the purpose and doesn’t provide the students with the proper knowledge of racism since “teachers in K-12 schools are not actually teaching CRT” (Ray and Gibbons 2021). So what really is the point if only some get to learn it and some don’t?
The idea of race has been used to justify systemic racism and bias in areas such as education, housing, employment, and the criminal justice system. This has resulted in disparities in outcomes and opportunities for individuals based on their racial identity. It is time for us to move beyond the concept of race and towards a society based on equality and inclusivity. By recognizing that race is a social construct, we can begin to challenge and dismantle the systems of oppression that perpetuate inequality. This means acknowledging the ways in which racism and bias have been institutionalized and working to dismantle these systems at their root.
The CRT movement “is a collection of activists and scholars engaged in studying and transforming the relationship among race, racism, and power.” They elaborate and include various core beliefs, both general and specific, that narrow their movement. In short, they believe that racism is always present and works directly against people of color. Further, the hierarchical systems of power favor the majority (Whites) and rarely ask them to compromise in discriminational decisions. There are smaller facets that surround these general beliefs such as the belief that race has been manipulated and abused for economic advantage and that an unsympathetic “voice of color” exists that exhibits an unheard experience that Whites simply cannot understand.
In this book, author Tara J. Yosso demonstrates how institutional power and racism affect the Chicano/a educational pipeline by weaving together critical race theory and counterstories. Critical race theory is a framework used to discover the ways race as well as racism implicitly and explicitly shape social structures, practices, and discourses(Yosso, pg.4). Counterstories refer to any narrative that goes against majoritarian stories, in which only the experiences and views of those with racial and social privilege are told. The counterstory methodology humanizes the need to change our educational system and critical race theory provides a structure for Yosso to base her research. This results in a beautiful hybrid of empirical data, theory, and fascinating narratives that works to analyze how forms of subordination shape the Chicana/o pipeline, while also exposing how institutions, structures, and discourses of education maintain discrimination based on gender, race, class and their intersections.
Delgado and Stefancic (2011) stated that Critical Race Theory explores how “race, racism, and power intersect to create different circumstances for people of color within society [...] and in postsecondary institutions” (as cited in Quaye, 2013, p. 172). Within the field of higher education, it is important for student affairs professionals to recognize how race permeates all aspects of an individual’s life to fully understand their students’ experiences. Unlike other student development theories, such as Baxter-Magolda’s (2008) self-authorship and Abes, Jones, and McEwen’s (2007) Model of Multiple Identities, CRT places race at the “center of the analysis and assumes that race is omnipresent” in an individual’s life (Quaye, 2013, p. 167).
Applying CRT to King’s story showcases the ways in which racism and racial stereotypes negatively affect Native Americans.
Today in class, we discussed a topic that is deeply engraved in American history yet widely avoided by many: race. More specifically, terms like “racist,” “All Lives Matter,” and “white privilege,” which may make some people uncomfortable but more than ever, need to be confronted and examined. We watched several videos containing a variety of people discussing their own personal thoughts and feelings on such terms to spark our own conversations on the same topics. After viewing the first video on the word “racist,” I began to reflect on my own actions towards other people.
Without a doubt racism still has an influence in the education system. Students in school today are still harmed by prejudice in the system and this interview is verification for those instances. My interviewee and I attended the same elementary and high school together. We shared