Gender is a socially constructed definition of what women and men are. It is different to the term ‘sex’. Sex refers to the biological characteristics of a woman and a man. What is masculine and feminine, for males and females, can vary depending on their cultural background. This means that the society’s expectations confirm the behavioural, psychological and physical qualities that are related to the particular gender.
According to this, gender identity could be a more significant predictor of the individuals’ behavior than is biological sex. Whereas gender involves the mannerisms and comportments considered characteristic of each sexual category, gender identity is more properly used when these attributions are made with oneself as the stimulus person (Unger, 1979). Gender identity takes multiple forms and can be a concept filled with ambiguity and uncertainty, because the messages about gender can come from a large number of sources (e.g., society, organizations, friends, family) that are often uneven and contradictory. This identity is a social construction under a constant development where social norms, structures, people and the self are very important (Ely & Padavic, 2007). Gender was classified as a social category linked with multiple social processes that generate and sustain differences between women and men not making it an innate concept for people.
When a woman tries to do her own thing, she still appeals to the men for approval. Women’s power appears to be only measured by their relationship with other men. It is insinuated that women are not worthy enough to have the same power as men. Generally, the women is thought to act foolish and emotional to please the men. Women try to prove their equality to men, but generally, the masculinity is the superior
Identity refers to how people define themselves and others and this can include factors such as age, social class, religion and personality (Jenkins, 2008). Identity can also be defined by race, this is particularly important for this study. Racial identity has been described in terms of a biological category (Spikard, 1992) and from a social dimension (Helms, 1995; Spikard, 1992). When described as a biological category race consists of individuals “physical features, gene pools and character qualities” (Spikard, 1992, p.14). Europeans used these features to group people hierarchically by their physical abilities and moral quality and Caucasians were the pinnacle (Chavez & Guido-DiBrito, 1999).
Gender is the attitudes, feelings, and behaviours that a given culture associates with a person’s biological sex. Behaviour that is compatible with cultural expectations is referred to as gender-normative; behaviours that are viewed as incompatible with these expectations constitute gender non-conformity. Gender identity is “one’s sense of oneself as male, female or transgender” (American Psychological Association, 2006). Bravo-Baumann (2000) defined gender as a way in which a culture or society defines rights, responsibilities, and the identities of men and women in relation to one another. Gender necessitate that health policy, programmes, services and delivery models are responsive to the needs of women, men, girls and boys in all their diversity.
Analysis of Sexism in English Language Linguistic sexism, or sexism conveyed within language, manifests in many languages and exists in many forms (Pauwels, 2003). This kind of sexism is apparent in the English language as well. In fact, it has attracted the interest of many scholars who endeavored to find out the degree to which English language perpetuates sexist values. According to Piercey (2000), the English language is devised by man, and it conserves traditional prejudices against women since men are the dominant force who owns the power to create the symbols. Kramarae and Treichler (1985, cited in Piercey, 2000) claim that he English language “represents man’s image of himself and of ourselves and the world as his creation” (p. 112).
According to this, gender identity could be a more significant predictor of the individuals’ behavior than is biological sex. Whereas gender involves the mannerisms and comportments considered characteristic of each sexual category, gender identity is more properly used when these attributions are made with oneself as the stimulus person (Unger, 1979). Gender identity takes multiple forms and can be a concept filled with ambiguity and uncertainty, because the messages about gender can come from a large number of sources (e.g., society, organizations, friends, family) that are often uneven and contradictory. This identity is a social construction under a constant development where social norms, structures, people and the self have are very important (Ely & Padavic,
INTRODUCTION: In sociolinguistics and other related ranges of the scholarly world, discourse is normally characterized as the relationship in the middle of language and its genuine setting. Numerous scientists and scholars relate language particularly to this area where there is great overlap in the middle of gender and discourse. Ways to deal with gender and language exploration might dissect the ways in which language reflects or impacts gender stereotypes, or that might examine the contrasts between how males and females use language. The study of gender and discourse not only provides a descriptive account of male/female discourse but also reveals how language functions as a symbolic resource to create and manage personal, social and cultural
Even as she is aware of this appropriation, however, her interiority – her feminine self – does not allow her to evaluate her gendered role or the power differentials between male / female Mukherjee posits Dimple’s descent into insanity as a trope that in the end allows silence to he overcome by an action – that of killing her husband – that simultaneously validates Dimple’s identity even as it confirms her marginality. In Wife, Mukherjee iterates the marginalization of woman by exploring – and exploding – ways in which culture and ideology construct feminine identity. Although expatriation
Both for its sexist and severe depiction of ladies and for the staggering impacts it should have on ladies and men" (Zoonen, 1994: p. 1). He accepts feministic perspective on media is excessively restricted and stereotyped in methodology all however "understudies, partners and writers alike then contend against such a position asserting, to the point that women 's liberation draws a tight picture of media of media and social practice, in