Jessica Petty
Dr. Frederick
POLI 369-CO1
May 3, 2023
Transforming Prejudice
In their book, Transforming Prejudice, authors Melissa Michelson and Brian Harrison detail the struggles that the transgender movement has faced in their fight to “reduce extremism and closed-mindedness” (13). They provide insight into why strategies that were successful among the broader LGB community have failed to influence public opinion regarding transgender identity and issues. Michelson and Harrison introduce a new theory which they refer to as The Theory of Identity Reassurance, which they predict will be more impactful in shifting public opinion and “speeding up the proverbial moral arc of the universe to more quickly bend towards justice” (24). While
…show more content…
It operates from the core premise that personal identity and self-esteem are key predictors of how and to what extent a message will be received. According to Michaelson and Harrison, attempts to change attitude are often perceived as threats if they appear to be inconsistent with existing value systems. Threats to self-esteem and identity will almost certainly “trigger emotional and defensive responses” (51). Thus, in order to ensure a message is received effectively, The Theory of Identity Reassurance appeals to recipient’s preexisting value system, affirming their own identity and self-esteem, while challenging them to link these preexisting values to issues concerning transgender rights. Notably, it does not require them to dismiss or deny any discomfort they may feel, instead, it “meets them where they are and encourages them to be their best selves” (53). It appeals to their sense of “moral elevation” (as most desire to be seen as a moral person who values justice and is intolerant of discrimination) promoting messaging which “confirms and bolsters their self-esteem as a morally righteous person” (53). In short, Michaelson and Harrison maintain that making others feel better about themselves encourages them to be accepting of others
The LGBTQ community is one that faces an ongoing storm of stereotyping and stigmas and the media is no relief from it. One major factor in this is the common trope of the violent and aggressive transgender woman, which is often shown through
In their respective pieces about the transgender community, Mari Birghe’s piece falls short due to its lack of detailed examples and its heavy reliance on eliciting sympathy from the reader to persuade as well as its failure to see the other side of the argument while Elinor Burkett’s piece proves far superior due to its multitude of extensive examples in addition to its surplus of concessions. Burkett’s piece is stronger in part due to the surplus of concrete examples provided in contrast to Birghe’s meager examples. In Elinor Burketts’s piece, which states transgender women are not entirely female because of their previous male privilege, she intertwines many specific examples that help to prove her overall message. This is that transgender
While
The topic of this text is gender identity and the context necessary to understand the article is what LGBTQ+ and supporters think and gender. The text was created to voice the author’s opinions to an audience of people that
With this specific thought in mind, I delved into the writing of Riki Anne Wilchins in an attempt to rummage through her words to find her values, intentions, and modes of persuasion while also looking to see how she chose to effectively project her writing to potential readers. In Riki Anne Wilchins' writing “What Does It Cost to Tell the Truth” Wilchins addresses a multitude of issues caused not only by transgender stereotypes, but all forms of stereotyping. Another example of authority is how she relays to the reader her unfortunate personal experiences with preconceptions society holds. Her examples of credibility included a multitude of experiences when she came face-to-face with ‘social inspection’– the act of society placing meaning on trivial aspects of our lives based off culture.
One would think prejudice is a thing of the past. Unfortunately, that is not the case, prejudice is still a common factor in todays society. Vincent N. Parrillo’s essay “Causes of Prejudice,” helped me to understand how we are affected not just psychologically but in a sociological way as well, as John A. Camacho explains in his A Few Bad Apples opinion piece published in the Pacific Daily News. Both forms of prejudice are continued to be explained through Stud Turkel’s “C.P Ellis,” he gives us an understanding of psychological and sociological prejudice through C.P Ellis’own experiences. This furthers our understanding on how we can be affected by both psychological and sociological prejudices.
As described by Society: The Basics, the four theories of prejudice include: the scapegoat theory, authoritarian personality theory, culture theory, and the conflict theory. The scapegoat theory claims prejudice is rooted in the frustration from those who are disadvantaged. People use prejudice to express their anger and frustration. With the authoritarian personality theory, it is theorized that being prejudice is a part of individual personality traits. This is theorized due to research that demonstrates if a person is prejudice towards one minority, they are prejudice to all minorities.
Transgender is the term used to describe an individual whose gender identity does not align with their sex assigned at birth. The documentary, “Growing up Trans”, is a sensitive clip to watch about young youths who attempt to navigate family, friends, gender, and the medical decisions they face at puberty. “Growing up Trans” focuses mainly on transitioned young youths. The transgender youth from the documentary links to many theories from chapter eight. Theories such as socialization, gender, sexuality, homophobia, transphobia, and microaggression are associated with “Growing up Trans”.
The term “transgender” is a label that was never used until the mid 1960s. According to history, “Psychiatrist John F. Oliven of Columbia University coined the term transgender in his 1965 reference work Sexual Hygiene and Pathology (“Transgender”)”. When a transgender person desires to be the opposite gender, they may get an invasive surgery to fully transition into their new identity. Multiple transgender people have started to announce the having of the surgery has destroyed their future (Bindel). People have the right to be whatever gender they aspire to be, but transgender people should do public activities and should stay grouped with their biologically assigned sex.