Why Shouldn T Socrates Have To Escape
In Crito Socrates in locked up in jail awaiting his death after being convicted and tried. While he is in jail a friend, Crito, visits him worried about Socrates and his impending doom. He wants to help Socrates escape. Crito at first want to help Socrates for his image. He fears the majority and what they can say about him favoring money over friends. Crito then continues to say that Socrates should not fear the implications his escape can have on his friends. Then he goes on exclaiming that letting himself die for nothing is unjust, Socrates would be betraying his sons and what he is doing by staying is not only evil but also shameful. Socrates does not believe so. Socrates exclaims that “whether we should act in this way or not, as not …show more content…
Socrates believes that they should first ponder his beliefs and principles and if and when they come up with a decision, then that decision must be accepted in all cases. For Socrates it is never justified to break the law, no matter …show more content…
51). Socrates states that in his escape he would have to commit injustices, whether it be by bribing the prison guard, or by implicating his friends in his actions. Therefore if Socrates would have to commit any injustice to escape, he believes he is better off staying put. Committing acts of injustice would corrupt his life. “…one must never in any way do wrong willingly, or one do wrong one way and not in another? Is to do wrong never good or admirable… (pg. 52). Socrates first establishes that doing any wrong must always be wrong, meaning that whatever the circumstance, a wrong must always be wrong. "...neither to do wrong nor to return a wrong is ever correct, nor is doing harm in return for harm done” (pg. 52). There are never a way when a wrong can be accepted as a right because of circumstances, but is instead a moral absolute. For example, stealing is wrong even if you are stealing as to not go hungry. It is never right or justified to harm because you have been harmed. Therefore Socrates escape is not justified because he was wronged by the
Euthyphro And The Crito Analysis
529 Words | 3 PagesBy questioning holiness, gods, piety, impiety and justice, Socrates questioned the authority, the choices it made, and the principals it followed. Unlike in The Euthyphro, in The Crito, Socrates defended the law and authorities. The debate took place in jail where Socrates was waiting for his execution. Crito, his friend, came to visit and tried to persuade Socrates to escape.
Crito's And Socrates: A Comparative Analysis
143 Words | 1 PagesThe dialogue between friends, Crito and Socrates, shows the similarities in each thought process as both men are eager to display their integrity to their community. My analysis will show an evaluation of the parallels between Crito’s and Socrates’ understanding of what is morally appropriate. First, I will elaborate on Crito’s argument in which a plan to escape prison is the best choice for both himself and Socrates. Second, it will be important to discuss Socrates’ rebuttal to Crito. This comparison will be accomplished in this paper by contrasting both of their viewpoints.
Summary Of Obedience To The State By Crito
1244 Words | 5 PagesSocrates makes the point that after being condemned to death in court had the chance to flee to another country as an alternative punishment. Due to this opportunity there would be no point in breaking the law by escaping when he had already had the chance to leave justly. Socrates has stated that “It is better to die with honour than to live in dishonor” and if he were to escape he would be making a very unjust decision that could lead to many implications. If Socrates were to reside in a new country, he would still be known as a man who breaks the law thus giving him a bad reputation. He could not return to his old ways and teach about justice, goodness, institutions and laws are of highest value to people because he would appear to be a hypocrite.
Russell Vs Socrates
559 Words | 3 PagesThe first concept that I noticed shared by Russell and Socrates was the concept that one had to remove themselves before serious philosophical contemplation could take place. In Russell 's case, he refers to the "Self" and the "Not-Self". With Socrates, as seen in the Apology, confronting his accuser about the corruption of youth, his accuser is silent because he had not given the matter any thought. Socrates awareness of his own ignorance frees him from what Russell would refer to as "Self". I mention this because it serves as a common theme even as both philosophers differ in their messages.
Socrates Arguments In The Crito
499 Words | 2 PagesSocrates’ Arguments in the Crito In The Crito, Socrates argues that he should not escape prison because it would be morally incorrect. He says that the really important thing is not to live but to live well. Therefore, by escaping prison, not only will he suffer the consequences but also his family, his friends, and the city of Athens. Socrates argues that the city of Athens would be affected if he escapes from prison.
Socrates Should Stay In Prison Analysis
710 Words | 3 PagesIn conclusion, therefore I should stay in jail and accept the death penalty. 3. Agreement argument – if I escape, then I will break an agreement I made with this city, to break an agreement is an unjust action, doing unjust actions harms the soul, and it is better to die than to live with a ruined soul. In conclusion, Socrates should stay in jail and accept the death penalty. In conclusion Crito's arguments are very narrow.
Comparing Letter From Birmingham Jail By Socrates And Martin Luther King Jr.
900 Words | 4 PagesWhile his friend Crito advocates for his escape, Socrates believes that disobeying the law would be morally wrong and undermine the state's authority and laws. As Socrates asserts, "Do you think it possible for a city to continue in existence and not be turned upside down if the legal judgments pronounced in it have no force but are nullified and destroyed by private individuals?" Socrates believes that by living in Athens and enjoying its benefits, he has entered into a social contract that obligates him to follow the city's laws, even if they are unjust. Socrates believed that fleeing prison or disobeying the law violated his principles and society's social contract. He believed breaching the law would harm society and weaken the state because the state's goal was to promote the common good, and laws protected everyone's interests.
Socrates: Should It In The Right To Escape?
837 Words | 4 PagesThat would not be good on his part because he would know this could happen but still proceed to escape and possibly be risking his friends lives. With the chance that his friends don't get caught and he did escape Socrates would be unlikely to find another town that welcomes him. There wouldn't be a city, that had well formed laws, that would allow a man who broke the laws of the city that he called him home for seventy years. If he were to find a city that had accepted him, he would not be able to continue his old life of questioning people and trying to improve them. He cant continue teaching people about how laws, goodness, and justice are the highest of value to people.
Private Life In Socrates's Apology
1021 Words | 5 PagesIn Apology, Socrates faces possible execution as he stands trial in front of his fellow Athenian men. This jury of men must decide whether Socrates has acted impiously against the gods and if he has corrupted the youth of Athens. Socrates claims in his defense that he wants to live a private life, away from public affairs and teachings in Athens. He instead wants to focus on self-examination and learning truths from those in Athens through inquiry. Socrates argues that "a [man] who really fights for justice must lead a private, not a public, life if [he] is to survive for even a short time" (32a).
Socrates Argument Of Tacit Agreement In The Crito
543 Words | 3 PagesBreaking this agreement would leave his conscience guilty and make his life not worthwhile. He also believes that if he were to leave it would tarnish his reputation of him, his children, who he wanted to raise in Athens, would also have to bear his reputation which would be ruined if he left. Socrates would rather die knowing that he did not break his agreement with Athens and ruin his reputation and have a clean conscience than flee to another city and live out the rest of his life with the guilt. Socrates also says that if he were to escape it would be hurting the city by undermining the judicial system and giving it no credibility to convict other criminals who would escape just as he did and leaving it susceptible to a state of no order and
Summary Of Crito's Three Arguments
718 Words | 3 Pages(Crito.49b). He believes the city raised him like a child from birth so retaliating is the same as striking your parents down. (Crito,50e). Socrates believes your country should be honored more than your parents or ancestors and by not doing so is not godly. Turning your back on your country is doing the wrong thing, so to escape is
A Rhetorical Analysis Of Socrates 'Apology'
1314 Words | 6 PagesSocrates was a greek philosopher who found himself in trouble with his fellow citizens and court for standing his grounds on his new found beliefs from his studies about philosophical virtue, justice, and truth. In “Apology” written by Plato, Socrates defended himself in trial, not with the goal of escaping the death sentence, but with the goal of doing the right thing and standing for his beliefs. With this mindset, Socrates had no intention of kissing up to the Athenians to save his life. Many will argue that Socrates’ speech was not very effective because he did not fight for his life, he just accepted the death sentence that he was punished with. In his speech he said, “But now it’s time to leave, time for me to die and for you to live.”
Socrates And Crito Argumentative Analysis
1382 Words | 6 PagesSocrates believes that justice benefits the just, but also benefits the city (other people) too. He is faced with a seemingly simple choice, escape Athens or remain in prison and be sentenced to death. Socrates’ central argument against escaping his circumstances is twofold. First, Socrates argues that “one must never do wrong.” (49b)
When Was Socrates Justified To Break The Law
1624 Words | 7 PagesOne should not harm anyone, even if he has been harmed as it equally harmful and immoral. Socrates would claim that by breaking the law one would do harm as not only the laws would cease to have power, but they are also being
The Injustice In Socrates: The Case Of Crito
1013 Words | 5 PagesHe reminds Crito “no human being should do injustice in return, whatever he suffers from others”(Crito, 49c). Socrates argues even if the jury's decision was unjust, it is never permissible for him to do injustice in return and therefore he will not try to escape. In essence, even though Socrates is offered the opportunity to
More about Why Shouldn T Socrates Have To Escape
Euthyphro And The Crito Analysis
529 Words | 3 PagesCrito's And Socrates: A Comparative Analysis
143 Words | 1 PagesSummary Of Obedience To The State By Crito
1244 Words | 5 PagesRussell Vs Socrates
559 Words | 3 PagesSocrates Arguments In The Crito
499 Words | 2 PagesSocrates Should Stay In Prison Analysis
710 Words | 3 PagesComparing Letter From Birmingham Jail By Socrates And Martin Luther King Jr.
900 Words | 4 PagesSocrates: Should It In The Right To Escape?
837 Words | 4 PagesPrivate Life In Socrates's Apology
1021 Words | 5 PagesSocrates Argument Of Tacit Agreement In The Crito
543 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of Crito's Three Arguments
718 Words | 3 PagesA Rhetorical Analysis Of Socrates 'Apology'
1314 Words | 6 PagesSocrates And Crito Argumentative Analysis
1382 Words | 6 PagesWhen Was Socrates Justified To Break The Law
1624 Words | 7 PagesThe Injustice In Socrates: The Case Of Crito
1013 Words | 5 Pages