A Holistic Approach to Crowd Management in Singapore’s Mass Rapid Transit System
Mithila Harish
Student Category – approximately 5,000 words
NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering (NGS), NUS
Contact number: 90178530, Email address: mithila.harish@u.nus.edu
Published and used with permission by Temasek Defence Systems Institute and Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, NUS
Abstract: As the population in Singapore continues to increase, it is extremely important that an increased focus is given to crowd control and management. In this regard, this paper gives an overview of traditional crowd modelling strategies and proposes some new techniques to potentially improve upon existing
…show more content…
1. Following instinct: This could be the cause of pushing others, trampling etc. as instinct takes over in cases of panic
2. Following Experience: Individuals may rely upon past experiences e.g. fire safety drills, safe evacuation procedures done before etc. This is important to note as it suggests that absolute instinct doesn’t take over in these scenarios- people are still able to draw from their experiences. However these individuals may be pushed and shoved by those who have no experience in these matters- thus leading to a stampede like situation
3. Bounded Rationality: Not all information is known, and not all consequences are considered. This may result in irrational behavior.
The Inverted U Hypothesis and the Signal Detection Theory support the hypothesis that when an individual is under increasing stress, there is an increase in disruptive and decrease in productive thoughts which may hamper the individual especially during such emergency situations [10].
Figure 1 Inverted U Hypothesis [11]
In their model, under ‘Locomotion and Steering Behavior’, they describe the agent implementing the following behaviors: walking forward, running forward, stopping, side-shifting, turning, and moving
One of the most important things is to decrease an individual’s panic because it increases the chances of being able to escape and not getting
When a person is in danger or experiences fear, the body sends split-second reactions that are meant to protect one from
This is your brain’s way of telling your body, whether it should stay or flee in a perceived or potentially dangerous situation. Cases in which the body does not have the option to flee can end up resulting in a brain alteration causing a psychological disorder. Paranoia, recklessness, depression, thoughts of suicide, night terrors, substance abuse, and sudden outbursts of violence are symptoms often present in soldiers
It is our most primal instinct and is able to drive us to actions we do not think through. It turns us into wild, thoughtless, responsive creatures. Creatures which survive well in the
When someone is placed in a situation they can feel uncomfortable, or threatened, which then
In these cases, it is a natural defense mechanism to protect something.
One example of this is the hysteria of McCarthyism in the 1950s. Many people are filled with fear of the Communists and accuse many innocent people. The accused must then say who else they know are involved, and this allows the hysteria to spread and leads to chaos. Another example of this in everyday life is terrorism. Many people in today’s society allow the extreme fear of a terrorist attack to control their actions and perceptions.
Leper went over in his chair and collapsed against the floor” (Knowles 137). This example of displacement reveals. Another example of defense mechanisms used by Gene is rationalization. Rationalization is a defense mechanism in which feelings or behaviors are justified in a seemingly logical manner. Freud says that,"The poor ego has a still harder time of it; it has to serve three harsh masters, and it has to do its best to reconcile the claims and demands of all three...
Critique of “The Power of Situations” "The Power of Situations”, by Lee Ross and Richard E. Nisbett, explains to the reader that the way humans respond to a situation is looked at wrong by most individuals. The authors tell how most people look at the wrong side of situations. On most occasions people look to see who the situation is happening to, instead of focusing on the situation itself and the proper responses that one would expect to see. The information in this passage would be most relevant to a student pursuing a psychology degree. Although, it could be read with purpose by anyone with interests in psychology.
In survival situations, people act out in different ways depending on how one grew up. Faced with threatening situations so may act out in the “fight or flight” mode and others may instantly freeze and tense up and don 't know how to comprehend what is going on. Survival is not selfish because it is considered a natural instinct, imperative to one 's life, and it helps to go on to and save peoples lives. To some, survival is considered a “natural instinct,” and it comes naturally to one, so when faced with a dangerous situation we often tend to go to refer to this.
A natural human instinct is to do anything in order to survive. Though a person may not necessarily want to survive, the physical body of a person does. The body naturally will try to do anything in order to protect itself and survive even when the person does not notice. Survival comes at a cost that not all people are willing to pay. To survive there are struggles and obstacles that not all are willing to face, but to get through these obstacles an individual is one step closer to survival.
These feelings of danger can stem from feelings of unpredictability and
Self-preservation is the instinct within us which is awoken by any form of threat or danger, at its most basic root a species such as the Homosapiens will possess a the desire to live and survive against all odds. A push to find food, water and shelter comes from the self-preservation drive at the core of our beings. Although this is true for our most basic natural behaviour, humans have evolved with the changing environment of the modern world. Instead we engage with our surroundings in order to self-preserve, for example many of us have learnt rather to sit and nod our heads at teachers instead of getting into fights when feeling threatened, for many this concept has not yet reached their thinking process, but this is the point of our evolution.
If I say that we all are irrational, some of you might defend me say that not all are irrational. But I can prove that all of us have unintentionally been an part of irrational decision making, like not wearing vehicle seat belt because you thought it might spoil your amazing outfit, smoking and drinking alcohol, poor financial decision (buying unnecessary items), not attending a lecture or class, and many more. In a survey conducted in Manhattan 50% of the people had purchased an umbrella for a very high price on rainy day from street vendor. Moreover, 77% of the people said they would purchase an umbrella for a high price on a rainy day if it were necessary. However, 90% of the people will not buy the same umbrella for even half the price if it was a sunny day (Summer, 2012).
Rationalism and empiricism are two methods that can be understood under the concept of epistemology, psychology and philosophy of psychology to understand where the source of knowledge comes from. “In psychology and its philosophy, empiricism and rationalism concern the sources of psychological states and capacities that may include, but are not confined to, state of knowledge (Longworth, 2009).” Rationalism states a priori knowledge, deduction and the concept of an active mind. According to rationalist, our minds have innate set of principles and skills. If we only use our logic in accordance with these principles is enough to obtain accurate information about all the objects that make up the universe.