In other words, immigrants bring with them high levels of human capital, and as such, they can more easily employ that human capital in the labour market compared to other countries. On this point of view, the presence of the multiculturalism policy contributes nothing to the successful integration of immigrants and minorities in Canada, and may in fact impede it (e.g., Goodhart 2008). However, there has been new research which has helped to clarify the role that the multiculturalism policy plays in the broader processes of minority and immigrant integration. This research on the effects that are brought by multiculturalism has evolved at two broad levels:
Multiculturalism is popular in many countries as it can be used as a strategy to fight inequalities. Supporters of multiculturalism claim that it removes social and cultural barriers for immigrants and minority groups, making them feel more welcome in Canadian society, promoting a stronger sense of belonging and pride in Canada (Kymlicka, 2010, p. 7). Therefore, multiculturalism is useful as it assists in the integration of immigrants and minorities. On the other hand, critics argues that multiculturalism accentuates the differences between groups rather than their shared rights or identities as the nation’s citizens as it promotes “ghettoization and balkanization” (Kymlicka, 2010, p. 7), thereby encouraging members of ethnic groups to look
The policy objectives for multiculturalism program focus on building an integrated, socially cohesive society and making institutions more responsive to the needs of Canada’s diverse population. Finally, inclusive citizenship is emerging as 21th century goal not only for multiculturalism policy but also for Canadian social policy as a whole (Richmond, 2005). The positive impact of multiculturalism policy Multiculturalism policy supporters counted that it stimulates integration through mitigating obstacles to participation in Canadian life . when compared to many other countries that do not possess an official Multiculturalism policy , it is evident that Multiculturalism policy has placed an indispensable role in the successful integration of ethnic and religious minorities and immigrants in Canada ( kymlicka,2008; kymlicka,2010) . From the example of success provided by kymlicka, ( 1998;2010) that are worth ******** : The high level of acceptance and reciprocal idealifieaion between native Canadians and immigrants .
As a matter of fact, Canada is assisted by becoming more multicultural, having a growing labor force, and immigrants gain by being reunited with their families. Overall, there are so many ways that Canada and the immigrants prosper through this process, and that is why it is an admirable mutualistic
Mutualism is when both sides benefit, and in the process of immigration, both Canada and the immigrants benefit greatly. As a matter of fact, Canada is a very popular place to immigrate to, it is one of the top ten most immigrated to countries in the world. Immigrants come to seek refugee, work, their families, or even just a new life. They help us by creating a better and younger workforce, and we help them to have a home and to be safe. One benefit of this mutualistic relationship is that we become a more multicultural country.
Canada is one of the world’s most welcoming Immigrant destinations. Canada’s official prominence on multiculturalism has frequently diverted attention from the normal problems of assimilation that most immigrants must resolve in order to inaugurate themselves successfully in the country. Canada is a multicultural and a diverse country however Immigrant Assimilation has always been a major problem in the country. Immigrant Assimilation is the process in which a group or a culture resemble cultures of a different group. Canada has a history of Immigrants Assimilation.
In addition to the deportations, approximately 30,000 immigrants were forcibly returned to their original countries over the course of the decade, this was predominately due to illness or unemployment. The number of people that left Canada compared to the people that came to canada, is hardly a percentage. This affects Canada greatly, as people are leaving, therefore taxes gained from the citizens decrease, and productivity of the work force decreases, as more people leave, less people are there to fill their roles in society (Encyclopedia). The dole was a small amount of support the government distributed to the poor and unemployed. The government relief was created for the citizens of Canada, as they were not producing enough income for their family.
Emphasis on maintaining and attracting immigrants stems from “facing the demographic reality of declining birth rates and population aging” (Satzewich and Liodakis 2017, 97). Therefore, attracting immigrants is essential to the prosperity of Canada, and it is in the countries best interest to provide adequate opportunity for integration of diverse cultures into Canadian society. Counties such as Japan, which also experience a low fertility rate, have suffered demographically and economically from a desire to maintain a homogeneous
We have to respect and learn from each other. Our weakness can be fixed by other’s capabilities. We are not born to be perfect, not born with a lot of skills. Therefore, we also have to depend on others. Last but not least, multiculturalism is the way to drive a country to beyond their
To begin with, during its long history, multiculturalism changed its denotations and number of people who supported it contrary to those who were against it. For one side, it represents the essence of a modern society. For others, it had negative influence which resulted in anxious, frustrated and divided nation. As an example of successful multiculturalism, we need to mention Canada as Canada is the only Western country to include multiculturalism into its constitutional law and the first country that proposed this method as a way of dealing with diversities. According to Ien Ang, it was associated with the consequences of immigration.