Culture is, in other words, deeply rooted in an individual and directs their mindset as well as actions.
This leads to the conclusion that, in order to analyse the meaning of intercultural compe-tences during an expatriation assignment, the cultures of Germany and China have to be considered first. Differences have to be found, evaluated and their effects on leadership during an expatriation in China considered.
3.2 Hofstede’s and Hall’s cultural basic assumptions
In the past decades numerous scientists tried to define intercultural differences to facilitate the dealing with members of another cultural environment. Two of the most well-known studies are the ones from Geert Hofstede and Edward T. Hall, on which the following analysis of cultural differences between Germany and China will be based.
Geert Hofstede conducted a study with employees of the multinational company Interna-tional Business Machines (IBM), which compared work-related differences in the national cultures of more than 50 participating countries. The study defined four dimensions of culture, namely power distance, collectivism versus individualism, femininity versus mas-culinity, and uncertainty avoidance. Later on, Hofstede identified a fifth dimension of cul-ture with a Chinese Value Survey: long-term versus short-term orientation.
Power distance is defined as “the extent to which the less powerful members of institutions and organizations within country expect and accept that power is
In the Classical Era, two influential empires emerged, Han China and the Roman Empire. Both were order-focused societies, which greatly supported the rise of these empires. However, Han China was built off the foundation laid by previous empires and already had a governmental precedent. In the end, both empires eventually fell due to a number of shared factors, one being the overextension of their land causing expenses to rise and borders to become vulnerable.
Rome (750 BC – AD 500) and China (350 BC – AD 600) experienced conflicts not only in the physical sense, such as in wars, but also in political struggles, religion, and power. Although each civilization had similarities, like structured governments in the form of emperors and dynasties, they also had differences, like in the way they wrote laws and dealt with handing out those rules. Religion was still going through changes of rules, while certain countries starting grasping ideas of new ones. War kept on brewing up between common enemies, causing battles against who should take over certain land parts. Finally, politics, with ever popular emperors and empresses coming about while other major ones dying off, causing civil confusion and conflictions.
Rome from 71 BCE to 476 BCE and Han China from 206 BCE to 220 BCE are two very well-known classical empires. These two empires have similarities and differences in their political systems, religion, and social structure. The romans had a democratic government whereas China had a singular ruler. Imperial Rome was monotheistic and Han China was polytheistic. While they both had similar class structures, China had a three tiered social system and the Romans only had two divisions in their class structure.
The ability to see the world as others do occurs only once. This is before the instance of any stimuli, any thought or experience; before the first breath. Culture is a foundation of beliefs and morals that are specific to one’s ethnicity. This is the distinct quality that everyone has based on their abstract views and varying backgrounds. The foundation of how people identify themselves and others is shaped by their experiences and interactions throughout life.
The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty of China were two of the largest empires of the Ancient world. The Roman Empire lasted from 31 B.C. and fell to the German Goths in A.D. 476, for a total of 507 years and Ancient Chinese empire lasted from 27 B.C. to A.D 476, for a total of 503 years. In the Roman Empire, as well as the Han Dynasty, there were similarities. Some of the ways that they were the same are women did not have much freedom, also they had strong militaries, both had sophisticated bureaucracy, and also had a wealthy contested government.
In conclusion, the two civilizations believed in entirely different ways to govern themselves and they both had completely different values of individuals. Athens had a strong confidence in each male citizen, believing that men were higher over all. They believed each man should engage in government and contribute their thoughts. On the other hand, Han China did not cherish the individual, instead, they believed men were a part of nature. They also believed that people should behave, be kind to others, and let the higher classes govern
Society was a huge part of the Roman Empire and Han China. They both have similarities and differences when it comes to their societies. The clothing, social classes, and the role of women are very different but are similar in some ways. In the Roman Empire and Han China, the clothing was important to society.
Culture is the building block for life. It sets society's standards, it sets our own standards, and everything we know is all because of our culture. Culture is a way of thinking, a way of behaving and learning. We express our opinions based upon our beliefs, and define ourselves by what aspects of our culture we choose to show. Culture's impact on someone's perspective of others and the world is greater than its other influencers because it can change how you interact with people, your ability to change, and your opinions of the world.
From 600 b.c.e to 200 c.e 2 empires with distinct political, religious and social structures were formed in Han China and Classical Greece. The Han dynasty differed greatly with Classical Greece in how it governed, what they believed and its social structures which lead to it being able to sustain a much larger population and last for a much large period of time compared to classical; Greece. To begin the Han dynasty continued the centralized government begun by their predecessors the Qin dynasty by having a monarchy however there were still regional governments. This differed greatly from the political structures in greece because in greece governments were organized in city states and many city states ran things completely different form others.
The 1st and 2nd centuries B.C.E. were an influential tipping point in history. Obviously there lies a reason why this is the time in history where we move into the common era. A growing dissatisfaction around the world on how empires ruled led to some large, influential administrations falling. Some groups that entered the power vacuum include the Han Dynasty in China and the emergence of an imperial Rome. The imperial administrations of Han China (206 B.C.E.- 220 C.E.) and imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.-476 C.E.) had similar set-up bureaucracies and saw their downfall through their alike policies, however their method to define society differed.
China and Egypt were both early civilizations that developed long ago and on different continents. In order to be classified as a civilization certain things were needed like a surplus of food, a division of labor, and the building of cities. Even though they were located far apart, many similarities and differences can be found between these two groups. China and Egypt both began near rivers. China was by the Yellow and Yangtze Rivers.
Hong Kong is a part of China, but this two places have different and contrast of the culture nature. Hong Kong, the culture can be described as a foundation that began with China, and then became more influenced by British colonialism. Therefore, Hong Kong develop an identity of as its own, a unique and fusion of Chinese and Western cultures. China, the culture of the People 's Republic of China is an ample and sundry mix of traditional was influenced by Chinese culture with communist and other international modern and post-modern.
The position of a country on each of the four dimensions could be indicated by a score. Each dimension’s score is on a scale of zero to hundred, and the range of scores represented the range of different answers to the four issues. The power distance dimension is defined as “the extent to which the less powerful members of organizations and institutions accept and expect
According to Hofstede’s cultural framework, the key drivers of Chinese culture, and in the context of this case, in organizations such as JPM are as discussed below: Power Distance This aspect deals with the fact that all individuals in societies are not equal – it expresses
International business has encouraged the idea of bringing all the countries together. Though there are many challenges from language, culture, technical development and business attitude that are faced by the managers working globally. A company or an individual need to have proper strategy in their mind when managing people from cross cultural