Light Skin or Dark Skin – We Are Still Black The world is not just Black and White. African American skin spectrum ranges from a variety of different colors. We are many different shades of brown, it is not that simple. We as African Americans has been discriminated for more than 100 years based on the color of our skin. We were treated unequally by the white government and white people in our community.
Throughout many years, racism has taken place starting as early as the construction of what is now the United States. There have been certain issues such as different colors of skin clashing to even demeaning a different race placing them into a different social class. Certain races, majority not being white, have been forced into slavery without even understanding why this is taking place to them. Races were being split into different groups. The white groups were looked to as superior compared to the black race who were looked to as just property and free labor.
Someone who doesn 't evolve around the suffering pertaining to it. Some might say they earned the usage because of their slavery, oppression, racism or what their ancestors have been through. Or they feel they have the right to tell someone “ you cant say nigga because you 're not black”. Some people tend to defend the word by associating it with nigger vs nigga but in reality they have the same root and have the same historical background. Plus there has been many cases where racist people have used the term “nigga” as a racict attack against black people.
Like a scar that healed over to protect from pain, so it was with black “history” in the US from Reconstruction Years until the Civil Rights Era, where African-American “history” and pain slowly encapsulated a wound that was never dealt with. Zadie Smith wittily stated in her modern classic, White Teeth, “Every moment happens twice: inside and outside, and they are two different histories” (Smith 299). This is true for the African-American who for centuries had his/her history stifled by white society that failed to give nondiscriminatory accounts because of racism, misconstructions, or indifference. Furthermore, African-Americans, having the trauma inside their consciousness (forever scared), give inaccurate portrayals of their own narrative as well as have insignificant historical discourses. Whether it be from fear of racism, literary system misplacement, depravity, suppression, or feeling defeated, the pain is not articulated.
In particular, the traits associated with Blackness are assigned in opposition to whiteness, which is alleged to represent purity, intelligence, beauty, modernity, and other mythical ideals. On a surface level, the terminology of Blackness is assigned to people who fit a particular set of characteristics, including, but not limited to, dark skin, or any skin that does not resemble the pale, non-melanated skin of Europeans. According to Cooper, racialization is based on the “Western self, reflecting its fears and obsessions concerning the body, sexuality, and mortality” on Black people (95). Characteristics, including ugliness, hypersexuality, and criminality, are then assigned to the category of Blackness, which further distances Black people from white people, who consider themselves to be superior (Fanon 10). Furthermore, the process of racialization is inherently gendered.
I think this test did a good job of depicting the implicit association and unconscious prejudice with racial groups, in particular African Americans and European Americans. As far as the legitimacy of this test, I think the race test did as good as it can, I mean no test is 100% accurate, because some people may not follow the rules, or they will lie about their answer to get a certain score. However, for the most part I think the race test, showed that even though some people may not have any hatred for any racial groups, but they can still think racists’ phrases and ideas, use that problematic thinking to generalize an entire race, just based on the actions of certain people in that racial group. With that in mind, I think this test did a great job and was accurate in its mission, to show that race issues is still depicted today, and instead of ignoring race and downgrading racial issues, we need to talk about and be uncomfortable to make change and be better people to each other, no matter the
The concept is more likely separates two people by a noticeable factor- race. This factor seems to be only a physical factor; however, it has nothing to do with a difference in biology. In fact, the "micro-level" of racism is tied to the "macro-level." "Macro-level" describes the entire group of individuals that show a certain set of difference that separate them from others. That is what called as groups' stereotypes.
Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom, Or: A Closer Look At The Form and Construction Of Storytelling To The Tune Of The Blues Throughout history, many cultures have passed down stories through oral tradition. Though the manner in which spoken word is delivered has changed over time, the fundamental core of the timeless tradition has stayed the same; Words have power. They can be used to spread joy, hope, and keep entire cultures alive. August Wilson’s play, Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom, focuses on the power of the blues to tell the stories of numerous African-American individuals, as they struggle to find meaning and justice in an unfair society dominated by a hateful majority. Set in 1927, the play takes place entirely in a recording studio.
The average genetic difference between two individuals of the same 'race' is about the same as that of two individuals from different so-called 'races’ and it is impossible to produce any meaningful genetic distinction between races. Skin colour correlates with sunlight and latitude therefore there is geographical variations not racial or genetic. Race might not be ‘real’ biologically speaking but, it is certainly relevant, it is a powerful socially constructed term. Anthropologist Peter Wade undertook research across Latin America to understand and break down the odd dual reality between racial democracy and racism. Geneticists have used sociological definitions to identify their sample populations and then they would present them as having these genetic profiles.
He looked at racism and how shifts have been made with regards to how we classify people into these different racial groups. Hall argued that racism is the natural connection that one makes between how one looks, ‘the difference between hair, skin and bone” - W.E.B. Du Bois, and their intelligence. What this came down to is that he saw racists as individuals who believe that race and the characteristics linked to it are biologically in our genes and are thus not a result of our environment. This is however not what he believed.