Jordan recognizes that he will not be able to live a long happy life with Maria and defeat the Fascist army. He understands that he will not be able to fulfill either of those fantasies. In this sense, Robert Jordan is not your typical 20th century hero. Generally, we think of heroes as someone or something that is greater than human, incapable of failure or death. Robert Jordan is not like that, he is capable of failure and capable of death, he is not greater than ourselves nor his environment; he is the perfect example of Northrop Frye’s “Low Mimetic Hero”, he represents “common humanity”.
However, that doesn’t mean that there should be oppression towards making decisions, for that would be the neglect of free will. “A Clockwork Orange” depicts a raw image of what could happen to the internal mental state of a person if he or she loses the right to have free will, only able to do what is “good” for the society. Of course, murder and rape are serious crimes and need punishment. However, the Reclamation Treatment that was operated on Alex didn’t change him from the insides, but was forced not to act from his desires. As Alex lost his way of expressing his id, he has become nothing but a “clockwork orange”, a man without free will, a man that is
Reynolds defines hate speech as something that is very difficult to define because there is never going to be an idea or opinion that everybody agrees with without any contradiction. He states that hate speech is “meaningless” and is just a form of speech that people contradict. He parallels hate speech to “racist, sexist, or poor in taste”, but doesn 't explicitly say that hate speech is exactly that. Additionally, Reynolds says that fighting words are not considered hate speech, but rather an allurement to fight one-on-one. Reynolds is basically saying that there is no such of a thing as hate speech because all speech is protected whether it is homophobic, racist, sexist etc.
Meursault’s emphasis on sensation rather than his own actions illustrates this absurdity and his own moral depravity. Meursault has no motive for killing the Arab and does so anyway. His lack of morality encourages this irrational behavior whereas if he had moral consciousness, he would be impeded from committing a murder. Society nonetheless attempts to fabricate or impose rational explanations for Meursault’s irrational actions because the idea that things happen for no reason and sometimes have no meaning is disruptive and threatening to
The Cyclops, unlike most people, was not afraid to break the laws of Xenia or the stranger’s nor the gods’ wrath that was known to follow being a cruel host, because he was the son of Poseidon. This allowed him to bully the visitors as he pleased, with no fear of consequence. But in reality, neither host, nor guest was safe from harm in the end because Odysseus blinded the beast and in return got the wrath of Poseidon, making his journey home a long struggle. Although the Cyclops didn’t feel the pressure of following Xenia he also didn’t have a trace of warmth in his
Since not even Simon was able to change the boys, they do not even deserve to be saved. Simon, who was purely good, had not evil within him, could not even enlighten the boys, there is no chance for the boys to be helped. The evil within all of them overpowers the good that be there as well, however, when one is given the opportunity to choose, they will turn to evil. It is difficult not to be tempted just as "Piggy and Ralph, under the threat of the sky, found themselves eager to take a place in this demented but partly secure society" (Golding 152). The boys constantly become savage and follow Jack because it is easier, it is safer.
All that Okonkwo ever accomplished was from fear of becoming his father, which means that he was only thinking of himself and not of others like a hero should. Not only was he selfish but in order to have people think he is strong he was willing to kill a child. Okonkwo is not tragic a hero because of his lack of selflessness and because he
Although Macbeth has done some really bad deeds, he cannot be called a bad person out and out who goes on to achieve his ambitions without any consideration. He’s also a victim of the realization that there is no meaning as such in this world. This instability snatches his power to think and he gives in to his wife’s provoking speeches without providing any counter arguments to her. If he had any of his individuality left, he certainly must have had given some thought to her speeches but the lack of it shows his confusion. As soon as he joins the opposites foul and fair, he’s encountered by the weird (which is undefined because in the world of Macbeth nothing is normal).
Technically, according to the list of ethics listed on the National Institute of Health’s website, there is nothing wrong with creating life from death. Playing god isn’t frowned upon because of religious or moral objections. Instead, it is a feared because of the unintended social consequences that might occur. Victor’s failure to even consider the possibilities, both bad and good, of what his scientific discovery might create clearly violates the code of ethics pertaining to social responsibility. In this case, reviving the dead didn’t promote social welfare or prevent harm.
Pompous Macbeth knows very well that if any harm will come from the situation, it will come to Dunsinane. Yet, Macbeth writes off the warning as somewhat a metaphor, seeing as that would never happen in any case besides me carrying branches, apparantly. Despite this and his unreal superstitious qualities, he actively contradicts himself by not taking heed to the warning. He is so unbelievably conceited that he overlooks his core beliefs as a man to show himself and maybe the world , which he was surely to burn down soon, that perhaps he was correct or victorious. What kind of man suspends the belief of what basically makes up his morals to prove a point?
“I won’t let you coax me into wasting my time with the likes of you, since I won’t be the one getting hurt.” Turning aside, he made ample room for him to pass, but there was just something about this young man’s attitude that aggravated him beyond reason, and although, he knew he should let it end here, he couldn’t. “You do realize, you will only bring embarrassment to the house of Gashard, furthermore, your friends won’t be there, this time, to help you, nor will your family’s armor and weapons be of any value, forcing you to rely on what little skill you possess, and, Gisholt, we both know that you, even on your best day, can’t defeat me and never will.”
For they no longer benefit the community. We are destroying ourselves. We no longer are finding the evil that walks among us, but more of placing blame on someone for our problems. We do not need to deal with the unseen for we cannot prove what they see and say to be true. The minister himself should be able to spot the devils work, yet he cannot, because he is too holy.