The issue of globalization has become a new agenda and one of the complex and widely- discussed processes in the modern world. Global standards cultivate, on the one hand, such values as democracy, social and economic opportunities, accessibility and mobility, awareness of human rights and transparency of international law. On the other hand, social imbalance, contradictions in policies and relative unsustainability should me mentioned. Cross-cultural paths and close interconnections are becoming possible thanks to the cutting-edge technologies, urban development, and partnership establishment.
In the frames of this essay I will focus on the effects and different sides of globally-oriented measures with which cultural institutions face. The Guggenheim Foundation model is the relevant case for my research. The museum, positioning as a ‘global cultural icon’ is open to the dynamically changing world and socio-cultural collaborations. Since 1980s, the Guggenheim brand has been extended into international context by opening several subsidiaries in the USA and Europe and planning one in the Middle East.
Within clue research questions a correlation between the art management and the globalization impact is demonstrated. So, how cultural
…show more content…
I am sure that global strategy is not appropriate for each cultural institution and The State Tretyakov Gallery can be included in this list. Some spaces have certain identity and very significant historical meaning. As Osborne Angela and Rentschler Ruth propose, keeping an authenticity is essential both for museums and audiences: ‘Authenticity is understood to be associated with reality, truth, and believability. <…> Authenticity is the accuracy or truth of the performance and performers depicting the artistic product, as perceived by the performers and the audiences. It represents values, attitudes, behaviours, beliefs, and social meaning’ (2010,
The struggle wasn’t made any easier when there were debates over which style of art the museum should hold. “Some trustees strongly advocated continuing to collect the work of emerging contemporary artists while carefully culling the collection of its less outstanding holdings to finance new acquisitions.” The museum had to sell portions of their collection just to afford the new works of art, just in order to stay open. Faced with this same debacle, Mary Miley Theobald discusses a common business practice of museums that is essential to stay financially stable. Source D outlines the main source of income for art museums.
Whose history does museum represent? How do museums represent history? Museums are important places for history. The displays help us to discover who we are, and how we have come to be who we are. But the displays in museums do not just happen, just like all representations of history, whether in books, songs, oral accounts, or even collections of photographs and documents, they have been created and constructed by someone for a purpose.
Israel Crump Dr. Keith Gumery Approaches to Liberal Studies 29, January, 2023 The Museum LensIt It is often stated that “a picture is worth a thousand words”, but has the un parting presence of smartphone photography dislodged museum audiences from the cultural art experiences? In Eric Gibson’s article, “The Overexposed Museum”, Gibson explores an absence of reverence and and robbery of the artistic cultural experience in museums (Gibson 19). The clear culprit and antagonist in the article is the overwhelming increase and culture of smartphone photography that has now been welcomed and encouraged in museums across the world.
The article “whose culture is it?” written by Kwame Anthony Appiah published in 2012, contains factual and suggestive content towards the preservation and importance of historical antiquities. The author discusses the positioning of cultural antiquities based on the ability of civilizations to preserve them. As examples were revealed, various acts have been taken accordingly; to legally provide the antiquities the safest solutions to preserve them. Furthermore, Appiah also discusses that some artifacts that belong to the artist, or contributors should be considered as universal art. He also questions some of the decisions taken by UNESCO, if they were truly for the betterment of the antiquities.
The museum is not a wholly government-funded institution. While it may receive grants or some funding, it is ultimately another apparatus that is controlled by the supply and demand mechanism of the market economy that dominates the country. David Rockefeller (Source A) depicts the financial status for the Museum of Modern Art, or MoMA in his time. He further delineates the status of the museum by explaining what caused the financial distress. He writes, “Since no one wanted to antagonize important trustees, exhibitions and acquisitions were often approved without regard for overall policy”.
Some important considerations include being able to successfully represent the culture being exhibited and finding ways to raise money to keep the museum running. One of the most important parts of a museum is learning about different cultures and indulging oneself into the history and artifacts. When one is responsible for finding such objects, there can be quite a lot of pressure. One wants
Museums must meet legal requirements of national and international law relating to the export and import of cultural property. Items acquired outside of these laws pose a security risk. See page X for details of legislation that may impact on your museum. The museum may be able to prove physical legal ownership through formally receipting of objects, but at times this excludes cultural ownership. A memorandum of understanding with communities, including tangata whenua and iwi Māori, may provide for object security where cultural and intangible ownership continues.
At the time of the fall of the Russian empire, the capital contained a considerable number of paintings by 19th-century European artists - in the royal and Grand-Ducal palaces, in aristocratic residences, and simply in wealthy households. Many of them found their way into the museums. The Soviet authorities quickly expropriated any items of artistic value, whether they belonged to the Tsar, the Church or the propertied classes. Nationalisation, often a euphemism for robbery, cannot be excused even when it has a solid ideological
People from around the world have had the great debate on if ancient artifacts from around the world should be returned to their original country, or if they should stay where they are to preserve the artifact. In the passages “Bring Them Home” and “Museums Preserve the Cultures of the World,” they both show different reasons as to what to do with the artifacts. In the passage “Bring Them Home,” they are arguing that the artifacts should be brought home to their original country and in the passage “Museums Preserve the Cultures of the World,” they talk about how these ancient artifacts should stay where they are to preserve the artifacts. These passages show the different side of the argument, but the passage “Museums Preserve the Cultures of the World,” makes the most sense in this debate. Museums hold some of the most important cultural artifacts in all of time and should stay where they rest instead of trying to move them to their home countries where they could be damaged on the move.
But some scholars also claim that “Globalization” is a new trend which technically emerged only in modern times or during the 20th century. However, the fact is that “Globalization” took place as a process of mobilization of human capital, travel, cultural exchange, free trade and modernization. Over the years the trend of globalization has seen some basic changes, which is the topic of this essay. This essay is about the difference between the trend of globalization in 20th century and 21st century. The trend of globalization in 20th century and 21st century differs in the following way:
The Human Identity Who conscious As Creation and Justice Mission Different science is different also understood of identity. From the perspective of philosophy considers that human identity is about the substance (creatures a rational and is able to find the experience and be able to avoid contradictions and vagueness) emphasizing the human ego and selfhood. From the sociological perspective to understand that human identity is being aware of who they are to others and who the other person for himself. From the perspective of the cultural to understand that human identity is being a cultured.
The painter, the photographer, and the sculptor create their joy as if they are a child with a box of crayons. Forged in creativity, their piece growing closer to their heart and the viewers. Art heals, art helps, and art teaches. Without it, we are not human but with it, we can create galaxies. Art’s beneficial impact on communities is evident through effective health treatment, adaptive education, and economic gain.
This research paper debates whether globalization had a positive or a negative effect in Asia during the centuries between 1750-1900 including the past and today the present. Not only globalization, but other terms such as industrialization and global capitalism, imperialism and nation state formation, nationalism and revolution reform and finally global migration. In result finding the consequences it brings to not only Asia but to other most relevant countries. Many humans are debating whether globalization brings a positive or a negative effect to nowadays societies. It is reflected in many ways and aspects reasons that could support each way of thinking.
These are the key aspects that can affect the organisation and management structure of a firm, all these interpersonal communication, management attitude, and social norms have yet been taken into consideration for Porter’s diamond framework. Moreover, Porter’s diamond framework does not cover how national culture will then affect the competitiveness in the national business system (Bosch & Man, 1997). Porter also mentioned that in firm structure and strategy, Japan business system prefers to maintain long-term relationship with their suppliers in the automobile industry is not based on their cultural perspective but rather it is due to pressure under those economic circumstances. This sentence is proven wrong by Whitley (1991), Japanese culture is well known for close connection and long-term employment in order to make their business system unique. Businesses in Japan have strong bonding with their partners to create strategies in reducing uncertainties, likewise these cultural factors is the action that leads to keiretsu being formed in Japan business system (Earley & Singh,
Culture is comprise of religion values ,economy ,languages ,class ,material items ,social institutions ,customs ,manners ,education, policies and attitudes (Czinkota & Ronkainen ,1993).Kirkman and Shapiro (2001) described that cultural diversity affect the management styles .He stated that managers with different cultural backgrounds showed different behavior, attitudes, beliefs and basic values. Moveoneinc (2013) stated that culture has prodigious impact over the management style. For example, in Japanese firms almost all employees are participating in the process of decision making. But in the society of America, only top management is involved in the decision making of important and vital matters. In the same way, reward systems are designed on individual performance in western countries and America whereas individual performance has less significance in Japanese firms.