Emotional Coping Essay

Coping strategies play a key role in the reduction of cyber victimization instances (Tokunaga, 2010; Price & Dalgleish, 2010). Even though at times it becomes difficult to distinguish among the conceivable protective measures as they are impacted by variables like age, developmental needs, gender and also. Still, the structure can be identified that the victimization takes, be it direct or indirect. Certain protective measures and coping strategies have been identified to help cushion from the negative impact of cyber victimization are described below:

● Emotional Coping: In spite of the apparent viability of this coping method, the prevalence (and preference) of this conduct has been demonstrated to differ impressively crosswise over studies.

Support seeking has been for the most part, discovered to be an exceptionally helpful system independent of the individuals whom victims trust in (Aricak et al., 2008; Machackova, Dedkova, Cerna & Sevcikova, 2013). Aside from internalized/disguised troubles, some cyber victims likewise slope to externalizing practices, for example, drinking liquor (26%) and smoking cigarettes (23%) (Ybarra & Mitchell, 2004).
● Role of Guardians: Parental supervision should be considered a major potential protective factor as researchers have consistently found it to be related to diminished personal self-disclosure online and hence, decreased levels of cyber victimization. Mesch (2009), also found that

Hodges, Boivin, Vitaro, and Bukowski (1999) in their research on traditional bullying reported that victims did report higher frequencies of internalising behaviours when they reported diminished levels of perceived social support. Prinstein, Boergers, and Vernberg (2001) on the other hand found that adolescent victims of relational bullying reported higher incidences of externalising behaviours due to lack of perceived social support. Kasprzak (2010), reported that both social and functional support prove to be a vital Factor in shaping one’s wellbeing. He defined structural social support as the help, psychological proximity and accessibility that an individual receives in one’s life. On the other hand, functional social support was defined as “a type of interaction or its consequences in the form of exchanging psychological or instrumental benefits”. Functional social support encompass emotional support, practical support and social integration. Likewise, other researchers too have successfully concluded that social support does deter the negative outcomes by enhancing healthy behaviours and decreasing stress levels which helps individuals cope better with life events.(e.g., Cohen & Willis, 2005; Ebata & Moos, 1994;