CRITICAL THINKING
Step 1
To carry out a critical investigation and review of the above-presented case, it is important to understand the dynamics of this case. CyberTech is involved in a series of cases that relate to all the companies that are mentioned in the various lawsuits. These companies are; Office of Personnel Management (OPM), Anomolous, as well as Equation Set. In one way or the other, CyberTech’s involvement in the various lawsuits is intertwined. To begin with, in the case involving OPM, CyberTech is the company that carries out forensic investigations. In other terms, CyberTech represents OPM as the firm carrying out investigative forensic consultancy. In the case involving Anomolous, CyberTech offers support to the company in
…show more content…
This means that the mitigation process should be such that it takes place in alignment with pertinent issues that will arise when evaluating the matter. Although in some cases there is no need for ethical considerations, some cases require that these ethical considerations be present. In the event that there is a need for ethical considerations, there should be a balance between critical reasoning as well as ethical …show more content…
Addressing or rather getting rid of the conflict of interest will make sure that the lawsuits are settled and involved parties can be satisfied with the outcome of the suit. I would recommend that CyberTech choose one company to work with. They could either decide to stay loyal to Anomolous or switch and maintain its relationship with the law firm representing OPM. Looking at the matter objectively, the claims made by OPM against Anomolous are damning and very serious. Therefore, in the event that OPM wins the lawsuit, CyberTech would suffer a huge blow. Therefore, I would advise CyberTech to terminate the relationship they have with Anomolous just to make sure that they avoid the risk of being accused of being complicit with the cybercrime charges that OPM has against Anomolous. On the other and, I would also recommend that CyberTech end the informal relationship they have with the law firm representing OPM. In case the lawsuit goes against the expectations by OPM, CyberTech would suffer a massive blow as well since they would be involved indirectly with OPM. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the company does not have any involvement whatsoever with either of the parties involved in the
The Plaintiff did not fulfill her contractual obligation to negotiate her claim with the Defendant prior to filing the lawsuit. The Defendant affidavit is attached herein. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing fact, and as the Plaintiff did not fulfill her contractual obligations, Defendant requests the Court to dismiss this case complying with forgoing New York federal court decision. Date: New York, New York June 18,
In Greene’s Case, they had Ms. Lawson sign a confidentiality agreement that was disregarded by the defendant. Although the accused became distraught with the loss of her position, it was wrong to relay the information regarding ever-gold to a competitor. c) Facts to be
3)If you do not intend to mislead people why you did not post a link on your website to Moon Microsystems ’s website and explain this is not a website for Mocha language? 4)Since Mocha language is developed in 2001, and you change the website URL in 2003, Do you think there is some relevances between these two event? 5)Do you think that registering these website will cause interest lost for Moon Microsystem? Objections: John Zucchini(Defendant Client
trust and confidence.” Cobb v. Pennsylvania Life Ins. Co., 215 N.C.App. 268, 278, 715 S.E.2d 541, 550 (2011). Contrast these relationships with cases where the Court has found the existence of a fiduciary duty or relationship: where a defendant took advantage of his relationship with his ill brother (Terry v. Terry, 302 N.C. 77, 273 S.E.2d 674 (1981)); where a defendant took advantage of his relationship with his wife (Link v. Link, 278 N.C. 181, 179 S.E.2d 697 (1971)); or where a defendant son took advantage of his relationship with his mother (Vail v. Vail, 233 N.C. 109, 63 S.E.2d 202 (1951)).
Respect for confidentiality, B.6.b. Confidentiality of records and documentation, and B.6.i. Reasonable precautions. 3. Nature of Ethical Dilemma
ARGUMENT I. The District Court erred in denying the Motion to Suppress because the evidence obtained from Assante’s personal laptop resulted from an intrusive, non-routine border search conducted without reasonable suspicion. The Fourth Amendment protects “[t]he right in people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures . . .”U.S. Const.
Non-compete agreements are an essential component of employer and employee relations. Sometimes, however, situations may arise in which it is not so clear that a breach of contract has occurred. The following are prime examples of the complexities involved in non-compete agreement cases. Gossard v. Adia Services, Inc., 723 So.2d (Fla. 1998)
By agreement of the both parties, the litigation has focused
They manage cases in a manner that is helpful for their customers. Customers ought to help their selected attorneys by giving all of them the essential data. The customer ought not conceal anything from the attorney that is identified with the case. The attorney realizes what data is critical for the case and what ought to be kept out of the case. They will display anything that happened in such a path along these lines, to the point that it won 't hurt their customer.
In Bailey Gallagher's 2016 peer reviewed article "The Singularity is Near: Implications for patent and Copyright Law in the Age
In the case study, Bob’s Meltdown, Jay Nguyen, CEO Concord Machines, has to handle a case of psychological harassment resulting due to work related stress; the main accused being his best manager, Bob Dunn. Jay needs to find a suitable solution as soon as he can to avoid being sued by Annette. Jay’s dilemma is that on one hand he cannot let Bob go as he is his best manager and only his department is earning all the profits for the company and on the other hand Annette has made it clear that if Bob stays, she’ll leave.
Through the use of appeal to ethics, personal experiences, and historical examples the authors
Developing from the reasoning of (Russ Shafer-Landau, p.p 13), it is clear that there is a difference between normative ethics and metaethics. Normative ethics are those values that develop from within a personality and are always employed whenever ethics are breached. On the other hand the metaethics is basically the diverse elements that are considered crucial for building positive ethical believes. (Shafer-Landau, p.p 29), also brings forward other moral ethical elements such as the moral error theory, the desire-satisfaction theory, ethical particularism and the doctrine of double effects. All the above elements are crucial for shaping ones ethical perspectives and inclinations leave alone resolving ethical issues within a society.
The animosity between Apple and Samsung is common in the modern market. The conflict of these technology companies helps us understand two aspects of the game theory that lie behind effective conflict management and
1.1 Background of the case The chosen company is Lenovo Group Limited which is a multinational technology company that is headquartered in Beijing, China. Established in 1988, Lenovo is the largest information technology enterprise in China, engaged primarily in the sale and manufacturing of personal computers, mobile telephone handsets, computer servers and printers, in China. It has been the market leader for seven consecutive years, commanding a 27 per cent share of the domestic PC market in 2003. It is also the market leader in the Asia Pacific region (excluding Japan), with a market share of 12.6 per cent in 2003.