I believe it had a positive effect on human civilization for a couple of reasons. First, humans were able to develop different technologies. Secondly, humans learned how to control animals breeding and plants growing rate. I believe that the Agricultural Revolution had a positive effect on human civilization. First of all, the Agricultural Revolution was a positive thing because humans started to develop technologies.
[The green revolution during the 20th century was the boom I will culture that was the result of human determination to break out of a food crisis.] The Green Revolution was caused by technological innovations, human want for food, and human want to escape status and class distinctions. Some consequences of his cousins were large economic effects, less hungry and more hard-working poverty, and let's class distinctions. The Green Revolution was caused by new technological innovations that resulted in severe environmental effects. Desertification, Deforestation, soil depletion, and water contamination are among some of the consequences of agriculture.
In this regard, studies show that famine has been reduced 20% in this period (Brownell, 2008), food supply raised 12-13% between 1960 and 1990, whereas without the new technologies food production were decreased around 20% and price was increased 35-65%. The other research in Asia shows that with 1% increase in production, the numbers of poor people decrease by 0.48% (Pingali, 2012). Furthermore, green revolution has had a great influence on labor’s life and provided opportunities for them to improve their life. In fact, this revolution has affected labors in some terms such as employment and wage. As I noted above, green revolution has increased productivity, so bulk density of generated plants enhance the need for extra labors for fertilizing, transplantation and weeding (Das,
The effects of the agricultural revolution have continued all the was into the present As the human population began to grow, it became hard for large groups of people to continue moving around often. Before the Agricultural revolution, hunter gathers, when not hunting, had a lot of free time. Part of this free time lead to population increases and more people to feed. Agriculture sustained large
They were in need of work, so they went to the city. Later urban population kept gradually increasing until it reached 41 percent by 1851. The duration of the agricultural revolution, Britain developed mechanisms to lead its way to the industrial revolution. Series of little drastic changes, benefits from profitable trading, and feeding the population made it possible. The agricultural revolution set the stage for the industrial revolution because raw materials, workers, merchant marine, and geography had some sort of start in
While industrialization brought about an increased volume and variety of manufactured items and an improved standard of living for some, it also resulted in often bad employment and living conditions for the poor. Education was poor, the rich had private tutors. There were of course schools and several universities. They were basically for the rich. The industrial Revolution brought changes in the world.
The overall quality of life had improved due to imperialism. For instance, the colonies were able to provide resources for the progressive nations when they were not capable of doing it on their own. By creating a new way of living for them, they were able to “give these people the benefit of other blessings of civilization which they did not have the means of creating themselves,” (Doc. 5). The range of job opportunities that arose was also a major positive outcome of the Industrial Revolution and New Imperialism.
The need of sustainable development was addressed as the consideration for future generations arises. When Industrial Revolution took off, it changes the manufacturing and consumption habit. However, after
These people included immigrants and other poor people in need of some extra money. When they started flooding into the factories, the owners had to find a place for all their workers to stay and live. Therefore, cities began to spring up around the factories. Economies began to grow and thrive as the population grew and became more interdependent on each other for
For example, it is possible to gain $1,500 to $2,000 per capita income in low-income countries, but $21,000 in others (Goodland 5). The experiments have shown that capital is one of the most important elements necessary to achieve a degree of development, taking into account the importance of other elements. Robert further states that the objectives of economic development are to increase national income, improve human living standards and reduce the internal gap while adapting the structure of the national economy to the benefit of the industrial and commercial sector (Goodland 9). I agree is that economic sustainability is one of the main sectors to have a sustainable development. My reason why I agree with Goodland's argument is that it achieves the principle of a free market as it provides products with good prices without daring the right of the citizen to choose the appropriate product.