Thesis Statement and Introduction: In this paper, I will argue that the Dakota pipeline should remain untouched because of the detrimental effects it could have on the citizens in each state, especially within indigenous tribes. The Dakota Pipeline is a 1,172 mile-long underground oil pipeline residing in the United States. It runs in the Bakken shale oil fields in northwest North Dakota and stretches through South Dakota and Iowa to the oil tank farm near Illinois. Together, along with the Energy Transfer Crude Oil Pipeline from Patoka to Nederland, Texas, it forms the Bakken system. The reason for this construction is for oil-profits for numerous companies that could profit from this construction of the pipeline. The $3.78 billion project …show more content…
Furthermore, I will analysis it using the intersectionality approach because it can give insight to this tension and what is potentially at stake for both sides. There must be a transition from a strong sustainability to a weak sustainability because the focus is strictly one-sided towards the economic component, but other aspects such as society and the environment are being neglected, so there needs to be a great consideration for these elements. Additionally, I will describe the cost and benefits concerning the pipeline, which will expose both sides of the issue, especially for the environment and the …show more content…
They have claim over the land for about three-hundred and fifty years, which is significant in a historical context and understanding the mistrust towards the government. In the early 18th century, with one battle in 1730 the Meskwaki nation suffered harming battles with the French, which almost destroyed the whole tribe. In the mid-19th century, American colonization and settlement preceded by the United States, which forced the Meskwaki to move towards the American midwest (also known at the time as the tallgrass prairie). Additionally, in 1851 the Iowa state legislative body passed an act to confiscate their land. Then, other states started to pass similar laws in Kansas, Nebraska, and Oklahoma which began to displace the Meskwaki nation causing them to relocate
Jon Tester and his reasoning for the benefits of Montana and his goals for it are contradictory. In my paper I plan on addressing Tester's conflicting ideas, and give even more reasoning
Meskwaki Tribe The Meskwaki is a Native American tribe that is settled in region across the United States. Also know as the fox tribe they are Algonquian language speaking group that have settlements in modern day Iowa, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Nebraska.
Rachele Liba Professor Whitehead POSC 100 22 July 2016 Placing a Price on a Green Nation Having lived a nomadic lifestyle across the United States, I have had the opportunity to witness the wonders of our flourishing society and the everyday turmoils that we face. Rigorous innovation has helped Americans fulfill countless dreams, however with every gift there is a usually a price-tag or opportunity cost. Now in the midst of the general presidential election, platforms that represent our beliefs can undergo much needed reform to address the opportunity costs that were surpassed in the process of success. Among the various problems found in our society, a key movement that has raised necessary controversy has to do with environmental policy.
History and Influence of the Texas Railroad Commission In my last 10 years working in the oilfield, whenever I was in Texas I always wondered why everything we did was reported directly to the Texas Railroad Commission. There was always a Railroad Commission Representative in all of our Pre-Spud meetings. The question of what power do they ultimately hold on the oil field. I decided to write a paper on the history of the Texas Railroad commission and any controversy that they could have been involved in.
It would transport crude oil from North Dakota to Illinois. The project developer, Dakota Access, says the pipeline would help the U.S. become less dependent on importing energy from precarious regions throughout the world. They also say a pipeline is the safest, most cost effective, and environmentally responsible way to transport crude oil. Although some view this pipeline as an asset, and something that would bring in millions of dollars along with thousands of jobs, many neglect to perceive the blatant racism involved in this act. The pipeline would be dug under the Missouri River, potentially affecting the Standing Rock Sioux Indians drinking water supply and seventeen million Americans.
The Dakota were being squeezed into smaller areas. Moving from previously prime hunting and fishing grounds to increasing smaller non-productive reservations, harsh winters and low supplies created times that that left many native families hungry and frustrated. Throughout the 1800’s, treaties were negotiated with the Dakota and the U. S. Government and native lands were exchanged for money, farming supplies and debt payments. These treaties were not in favor of the native population. By the late 1850’s, treaty violations by the United States and late or unfair annuity payments by Indian Agents, those authorized to interact with natives on behalf of the U.S. Government, caused increasing hunger and hardship among the Dakota.
Some believe that oil pipelines, such as the Keystone XL and the Bakken Pipeline will be the first step to isolating ourselves from depending on outside threats for resources. Others believe that oil pipelines have the ability to contaminate the world, not only through water and climate, but also through the economy. The public needs to be informed about what really goes on behind the scenes, what the fate is of towns that have oil pipelines running through them, and why protesters are so headstrong in their beliefs. North Dakota is a hotspot for oil related activity, and has housed the controversies of the Keystone XL Pipeline and the Bakken Pipeline.
Santana Janis was by no means an atypical young teenager. Others described her as a “bright [and] outgoing” girl who liked horseback riding. Her community’s characteristics, however, were very different from that of a typical American town. The median household income in her hometown, Manderson, South Dakota, is less than half the U.S. average, and almost four-fifths of the town’s population live below the poverty line. This dysfunction affected Santana: she lived with as many as a dozen siblings and her grandfather in a dilapidated trailer.
Now imagine other properties, such as, Indian owned land, private lands, and state lands that are not included in the number of acres used for gas and oil sites. Drilling on federal and Indian lands are primarily regulated by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM). As of March 2, 2017, there were approximately 29,996 approved oil wells and approximately 27,780 approved natural gas wells in NM alone (Fracking in New Mexico). Majority of the Dine people living on the reservation don't have access to clean, running water and they must haul it in tanks or barrows back home or to a crop field.
As Kitson (2009) notes, "the hydropower projects, in many ways, represented a new form of colonization, as indigenous peoples were excluded from the decision-making process and bore the brunt of the social and environmental impacts of the dams" (p. 630). This lack of consultation and collaboration with Native American communities during the planning and approval of hydropower projects has been a significant challenge in mitigating their impacts. In fact, as Deloria and Lytle (2011) explain, "the United States government, which had a trust responsibility to protect tribal lands and resources, had approved the dam without consulting the tribal nations that would be most affected by it" (p.
4. Finance Perspectives: 4.1 Evaluation between Hydraulic Fracturing and Oil Drilling: 4.1.1 Cost Saving: The conventional oil drilling technique is much better from the oil fracking technique in terms of cost of production, as the cost of production of one barrel of oil via oil fracking technique is nearly 70-85 USD per barrel, on the other hand, the cost of conventional oil production estimated to be about 3-6 USD per barrel and even less than that in some cases. According to the Petroleum Policies and Strategic Outlook Center report that the oil fracking boom is just illusions where it is certain assured that dealing with oil fracking is facing technical difficulties that make it very high in production cost compared with the conventional oil drilling. In addition, the efficiency of oil fracking production is very low which is up to 5% at best
The tension between First Nations and pipelines can be understood in the context of nationalism because both issues are closely tied to national identity and the concept of national interest. Within the source it shows a pole with one side as a representation of the Indigenous while the otherside is a pipeline. It conveys the tension between the two and the nationalism shown in this is how they both come from the same place but hold very different goals and objectives. Nationalism is the belief in the primacy of one's nation, and the desire to protect and promote the interests of that nation. Proponents of pipelines often frame their support in nationalistic terms, arguing that pipelines are necessary for Canada's economic growth, energy security,
Native communities, historically, have struggled economically compared to those of other races nationwide. So, some tribes decided to search for alternative sources of income to boost their profile and diversify their investments. One of the ideas tribes had was starting gaming operations. This idea became reality in some tribal communities with the opening of bingo operations and casinos. Today, the true effects of gaming facilities on tribal land is debated, with the consensus leaning towards minimal benefits.
Controversy Surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline To build or not to build, this choice will impact the relationship between the US and Canada and determine the level of dependence the US will have on countries that are not so friendly. “TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL Pipeline would transport oil sands crude from Canada and shale oil produced in North Dakota and Montana to a market hub in Nebraska for delivery to Gulf Coast refineries. The pipeline would consist of 875 miles of 36-inch pipe with the capacity to transport 830,000 barrels per day” (Parfomak, Pirog, Luther and Vann 4). The construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline would strengthen the United States economy, provide energy security and have minimal environmental impact. “The Keystone XL project would create $1.1 trillion in private capital investment at no
Before South Dakota was admitted into the US, It was Sioux land and many other Native tribes land. “The Sioux and the Cheyennes became allies, and by the end of the 18th century, the Sioux had driven away other groups and claimed the Black Hills as sacred land, believing that they were the homeland they were destined to find” (Andrew Mathews 2015, p.10). How was South Dakota even included in the US? Well according to (Andrew Mathews 2015), the US government made false promises about the hills and has kept them ever since. Many Native Americans are not happy with this and just want their land back.