He strongly believes that “the scientific method is our only source of knowledge” (58). I disagree with his belief because people also possess their own sense of knowledge. They gain this knowledge through the different obstacles they come across in their lives, which indicates that not all knowledge comes from scientific method. Freud describes “the teachings of Jesus as “psychologically impossible and useless for our lives” (38). I cannot agree with his statement because there are people who study and believe in Jesus because Jesus gives them an optimistic view to life.
In this case the Bible does not give a detailed explanation about how the world was created but only talks about who created the worlds, on the other hand science explains how old the earth is and how it was made. Like Augustine says that the two books of God cannot contradict each other, which means that conflicts arise when any of these Books are interpreted wrong. Conflict arise only if one has a presupposition that science is false, but making science and theology interact with each other through dialogue will shed some light on the truths that they claim. These two books are meant to answer different questions and it isn’t fair to impose and scientific question on the Bible because the Bible was not meant to answer the mechanical functions of the natural world but the Bible gives a purpose for life and talks about the cause of life.
He was trying to explore and research for the good of science. But it is especially hard to do when your thoughts and ideas are rejected by one of the most influential man in the world. Galileo was one of the few to see the similarities of science and religion, realizing their likeness instead of their differences. “Galileo Galilei, though famous for his scientific achievements in astronomy, mathematics, and physics, and infamous for his controversy with the church was, in fact, a devout Christian who saw not a divorce of religion and science but only a healthy marriage.”(Christainitytoday.com 1). He is commonly misjudged as an atheist or agnostic.
Murphy (1986) reminds us that in the U.K., the popularity of medical genetics and the abuse of Darwinism created increasingly racial and racist accounts of why certain groups of people were more degraded or tainted than others. Very little was known or researched on what was happening to large groups of individuals who were needing or seeking help in the context of alienation and disadvantage. Power in the two approaches Foucault points out that juridical systems of power produce the subjects they subsequently come to represent” Power in transcultural psychotherapy inevitably “reproduces” what it claims merely to “ represent”, which is decentralization and seclusion. Fukuyama (1991) commented that “many people belonging to cultural groups who do not fit within the dominant culture power structure experience various forms
Darwin’s intention was never to directly challenge religion, but many took it that way. People had opinions of things like “Why does Darwin feel the need to question God?” and “Is the theory of intelligent design not good enough for him?” To some religious types, the understanding that Darwin had beliefs that conflicted with their own was an attack on Christianity. Charles Darwin was an explorer. He explored the ways of evolution and discovered natural selection. Even though Charles was a genius, he faced many problems while making his theory.
This idea is based on the fact that Scientists are quick to give credit to God in areas where scientists are not able to find answers. He is assigned to areas evolution cannot explain (10 Dangers of Theistic Evolution). This idea demonstrates that God is not exactly supreme and in some way evolves too. Another aspect of this idea of creation is in Adam and Eve. This theory follows the claims on the Bible, at least the ones pertaining to creation.
Although, for example, he did not like the Puritan ways or beliefs he would tolerate the people who did. Roger Williams ultimately declared that Christ’s true church could not be known among men until Christ himself returned to establish it. Another huge belief Williams had was the separation of church and state. Roger was a big encourager
The main problem in animal cloning up to this time is the efficiency of the process, how effective it is for us. The recent effectiveness of Nuclear Transfer is underprivileged. The result of nuclear transfer is not really a clone because it possesses larger differences from monozygotic twins. The public has a great dissatisfaction against cloning for it is not fair to the animals and is in opposition to the law of nature. There is also a huge part of literature citing high percentage of miscarriage, stillbirth, early death, genetic abnormalities, and chronic diseases among cloned animals.
When the wheel was invented people were able to carry heavy objects without exhausting themselves, they were able to trade and build bigger structures. But the reason why science in Brave New World is disliked by the readers is because the way it created a society that is totally controlled by the world state, a society where a ‘race’ of humans is superior to others and a society where family and religion were replaced with science. Science also controlled the emotions of all the individuals. The humans in Brave New World were not considered humans anymore, they were all cloned in laboratories and then conditioned to fit their roles in society. When science is abused to create humans that are so unnatural it then should be considered evil.