David Reimer

692 Words3 Pages

The story of David Reimer is unquestionably an eye opener to the unknown world of transgender in North America. This story was not only heartbreaking in nature it also was quite disturbing. I tend to think that doctors have their patient’s best interest in mind; however that does not seem to be the case between Dr. Money and David Reimer and his family. While watching the video of David story, I wanted to understand the Doctor’s theory, ponder whether I could accept his proposed validity, and answer the question of what I would do, as a parent, given that I was placed into a similar situation as David’s parents. Dr. Money had a theory that pertained to nature vs. nurture. He referred to this theory as the Theory of Gender Neutrality. The doctor proposed was that identity genes were neutral in the first two years of life and because of this a child could be raised as the opposite gender given the parent nurtured the child as that particular gender. I disagree with Dr. Money’s theory and I felt that he took advantage of this family by brainwashing them in order to enhance his own theory. After all he …show more content…

Money’s theory is false. This doctor saw an opportunity to further his scientific breakthrough, if you will, by using a family that has just suffered from a traumatic event and who only wanted to help their young child. The doctor needed to children from the same family to test his theory and he seized this opportunity when David’s family approached him. This doctor knew his proposed plan may not work and I suspect this because of his saying to the parents never to tell David the truth about his real gender identity. This doctor knew that if this child was struggling with gender identity and found out the he was in fact was a boy, he would want to be a boy. This would go against everything the doctor had worked towards. This one reason is why he went public with this theory; and why he continued to push David to follow through with the

Open Document