Islam and Christianity eventually had many similar attitudes towards merchants up to the 1500’s such as they both valued honest trade. Where their attitudes differed, however, was when it came to the status of a merchant due to the fact that the Quran praised it, whereas the Bible started disfavoring merchantry as an occupation. Islam and Christianity rose similarly, as they’re both Abrahamic religions (meaning the two faith’s are centered around Abraham being the first prophet). Because of this fact, we can see many other correlations with how both of these beliefs treat others, such as merchants. Merchants arose with the help of the Mongolian Empire (in the 13th century) which helped to establish the world's first trade infrastructure on …show more content…
Muslims believed that merchants were just like any other person, but what defined if they’re good people or not was their honesty. Islam is very big on honesty, even more so in merchants as Muhammad (the founder of the religion) was a merchant himself (so he led by example). We know this is true because between 620-650 C.E. When Muhammad first put the words of Allah on parchment, (document 2) he stated that an honest merchant will make it to paradise over one that cheats/steals from his clients. A final piece of evidence that shows Islam valued honesty in trade would be found in document 7, which is about a weaver who buys all of the yarn from his guild rather than having it be distributed amongst the other weavers as well. The other weavers then took the culprit to (an Islamic) court for his wrongs, arguing that keeping all of the yarn to oneself is against old customs. The intention behind writing this document was to target other Muslims and show them an example of how not to engage in mercantilism; It’s giving an example of an unhonest man who took advantage of the limited supply for himself. These connections formed through the friendly attitudes of merchants made it easy for Islamic ideologies to be adopted by big empires such as he Mongolian Empire (as their honesty and friendliness was a favorable quality that the Mongolian leaders would want in their empire), and even …show more content…
In fact, the Bible (document 1) stated that rich men such as merchants will hardly ever make it to Heaven. Christians, at this point (1st century) , had no feelings of respect, acclaim, or even approval towards merchants. We can even see pious merchants who leave the profession and their gained wealth to serve God instead, such as St. Godric (document 3). This 12th century vendor would rather find happiness in faith than in the wealthy lifestyles of a merchant, for this reason, he formed a relationship with God to help him find his path, and when he found himself again, he charitably gave his possessions and wealth to be distributed among the poor. This document is notable because it was a depiction of St. Godric's life (written by a monk) to give Christian’s an example to look up to, similar to how Muslims have Muhhamad to look up to, Christians now had St. Godric thanks to the work of Reginald of Durham. Reginald used Godric as he came from merchantry and making his wealth through dishonesty, after he found God and his honesty he was greatly rewarded with a place in God’s kingdom which would appeal to the poor/middle
This helped them expand Islam because they met new religions which helped them expand as well. This is from Document B. According to Document C it stated that they were gift-giving and had a system of stipends which was payment. This shows that they expanded the Islam Empire by exchanging things and money which also leads to expansion.
KAILI HONG PER.3 THE ISLAMIC EXPANSION The early Islamic empire expanded in a couple of ways. One of the ways was the war. I found this evidence in document A where it says that the Muslims to fight gathered together to fight the Greeks. The Greeks would tie each others foots to each other so none of them would escape during the war.
In the early 1500s, the Muslim merchants were known as some of the greatest traders in the world. They would sail to all parts of the world to distribute goods and compile a variety of different cultural customs. They also traveled to collect more desirable goods to sell to wealthy buyers for large profits (Doc. 2). Their very admirable reputation let them sell their products to wealthy people to then live rich lives and control all of the trade going on in and around Calicut. Long after the Portuguese acquired power, they were brought very poor quality product.
Many if not all civilizations during the time of the early Islamic world were heavily involved in trade. Muslim traders between the 600th and1400th centuries used some new and borrowed ideas to become trading and commerce innovators. Islam differed in many ways with Christian religions of the East. One of which was that Muhammad, being a business man himself, promoted the idea of making profit on trade.
The Europeans, who were more focused on forcing religion than trade, were often close minded to relying solely on their own ideas when it came to trade and production of certain products, which resulted in some cultural consequences. Documents 3 and 5 show some of these consequences, while document 11 shows an example of the Europeans not forcing religion, and the positive outcome that came with that. In document 3 an outsider makes his way in China where Christianity was almost not present, with the mission to convert as many people as possible. Unlike Muslims, Christians tried to force their religion onto others, which was usually not successful, exactly like in this case. Document 5 is a Christians’ biased view on markets in Europe and how it goes against Christianity.
Throughout the documents, Christians, and non-Muslims in general are not given a voice in the situation, reflecting that the lack of a voice gives the impression that this ultimatum was not so much a decision, but a passive-aggressive force. A voice from non-Muslims helps historians to better understand the relationships that existed, not just hearing the story told from “the winner’s perspective”. The Islamic empire also spread because their army was very much feared throughout the land due to the fact that they took captives “without number”. In a secondary source, wherein the author’s tone resembles repugnance, it is document this fear of the Muslims was so intense because of the fact that they were so ruthless, powerful,
The Islamic Empire was huge, large, and untied. The early Islamic empire expanded by fiercely attacking and conquering other lands, as well as uniting them. To start off, In Document A (which is reliable because it happens to be written by Muslim historian Ahmad al-Biladuri in the 800s) it talks about how they killed 70,000 people. Even girls helped in creating a bloodbath which shows how fierce and strong they were on a battlefield and how they easily took more lands.
Document 7 shows An islamic court was accusing a person for buying all the cotton from a vendor that only comes in once in a while, for himself. This contrasts from their guild's rules that they should all buy a small amount of cotton for each person so they can all have an equal amount of weaving material. This shows that Islamic customers of traders also practice fair trade rules. Thus being similar to the Christian customers in the Holy roman empire, that also practice fair trade by not underpaying. However, a key difference in the two religions' trade, is whether you should sell an item for more than it is worth.
The attitudes of Christianity and Islam towards merchants and trade are different from one another in the beginning stages, but as time progress each moderate their earlier views. In the beginning Christians found it unfit to be a rich merchant, while Islam’s judgment on trade was acceptable as long as they were honest and the trading was just. As time went by over a couple hundred years, the followers if each belief changed their views on trade, though it was acceptable, merchants were expected to trade geniuses. In the beginning Christians found it unfit to be a rich merchant, while Islam’s judgment on trade was acceptable as long as they were honest and the trading was just.
As the opportunities for trade increased, merchants slowly gained more power in society. Eventually, they became the rulers of Southeast Asia, and this continued into the Early Modern Period.
First they had crossroads of profitable trade. They would trade perfumes, precious metals, incense, and silk filed through their town, headed North to coastal town. When they would trade overseas to the Arabian Peninsula, they traded spices, textiles, and spices from Asia. Mecca was rich due to travel connects to Europe, Asia and Africa. Trade became such a big thing in Islam, it was known as...
Christianity and Islam are the two largest religions in the world, with 2.1 Billion and 1.3 Billion followers respectively. Each had their own rise, golden age, and eventual large-scale split. However, each religion spread in different regions of the world in different ways and developed their own traditions and structures. Christianity and Islam have similarities such as a large-scale split and a history of spreading through popular trade routes, while simultaneously having many differences such as where the two religions spread, the methods in which they spread, and the structure of their religious leaderships. One of the primary differences between the spread of Islam and Christianity is the directions in which they spread.
Also in Christianity, the story of Adam and Eve is synonymous with sin. In 1099 a considerable conflict occurred to drive a wedge between the religions. The event was the Crusades, and it resulted in the slaughter of a majority of the inhabitants and the seizing of Jerusalem. Islam and Christianity share the similar value of being monotheistic and worshipping a single God.
For example, when China started using silver as currency, they traded with the British and Dutch. The Dutch would pay with pesos that had been made by African slaves using Incan and Aztec forms of labor. The silver would then eventually find its way to more places. Although, the people at the time didn’t know this, the world was interconnected because of trade, and because of the many places and people involved in trade. Why was trade so pervasive in the Islamic world prior to contact with the Portuguese?
Some people have always wondered how others have felt about them, like the merchants of the mediterranean up till 1500 C.E. These documents show the christian and muslim attitude towards the merchants of these times. Throughout the years the christian’s attitude towards trade and merchants slowly, increase where the muslims attitude decreases. During 70-80 C.E. Matthew, a disciple of Jesus writes in the Bible describing an instance where Jesus had said,”a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven.” This can be described as a negative attitude towards merchants of the time, because they were some of the wealthier men in their areas. Later in 1170 C.E. Reginald, a monk of Durham and a friend of St. Godric, tells the reader of his