When slavery was still in its infancy in 17th century North America, the volume of enslaved African Americans brought to Virginia and Maryland was estimated at only a few dozen per year. Due to high demands for tobacco, by the end of the 17th century the number skyrocketed to a half a million. Given this information, how could the founding fathers possibly believe slavery would eventually eradicate itself? By the time the Constitution was written, slavery was already completely integrated into the economy. Slave-based agriculture was generating huge profits for the south. The southern elites who owned these plantations had no intentions to give up their slaves. The founders must have realized that the southern economy would be devastated if …show more content…
One issue they faced concerned how they would count slaves for legislative purposes. The free North states thought slaves shouldn’t be counted at all because it would give the slave states an unfair representation due to the high slave population. However, the South disagreed for they feared the Northern states would have a substantial population advantage if the slaves were not counted. They worried that the Northern states would use such an advantage against them to regulate or even abolish slavery. To appease the slavery states they enacted the Three-Fifths Compromise. The compromise said that each slave would count as three-fifths of a person for representational purposes. Though they circumvented the word slave and said a free person would count as one and “none free persons” would count as three-fifths. In The Half Has Never Been Told, by Edward E. Baptist, the author argues that, “by the 1810s, thanks to the Constitution’s bargains, seventeen southern congressmen represented three-fifths of the slave population. This increment allowed southern politicians to dominate the Republican faction, and thus—with the loyalty of northern Republicans—the entire government.” (Baptist 153) This legislation helped to ensure the South’s ‘cotton kings’ would control the presidency for many years to come. In 12 of the first 16 presidential elections, a Southern slave owner
Each state would have the same number of representatives in the senate. The compromise regarding representation to appease the plantation elites was known as the 3/5ths compromise. Southern states wanted (did they?) slaves to be included in the population that would be represented in congress for each state. The reason Southern states wanted slaves to be represented (even though they couldn’t vote) was because more representation meant more power for their states.
Slaves are very hard workers that are forced to do the work of their owner. Slaves have a very hard life and usually face sickness and death. Slavery is a form of exploitation. Slaves were considered property and would lose many of their rights. One-fifth of the profits go to the king that are obtained from New Spain.
Southern states battled for slaves to be checked as far as portrayal. The bargain between the two wound up plainly known as the three-fifths trade off on the grounds that each five slaves would be included as three people terms of portrayal. Commerce Compromise, The bargain commanded that duties were just to be permitted on imports from outside nations and not sends out from the U.S. This trade off likewise directed that interstate business would be managed by the government. It additionally required that all trade enactment be passed by a 66% larger part in the Senate, which was a win for the South since it countered the energy of the more crowded Northern states.
During the early years of America, agricultural demands drove most of the economy allowing the South to demanded political protection. One of the protective measures was the Three-Fifths Compromise in 1787. The South wanted to count the slaves toward its population allowing for more representation. At the Constitutional Convention, the delegates decided to count a slave as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of determining the population for how many seats each State would have in the House. This solidified Southern control over Politics for several years to come.
The 3/5ths compromise The smaller states wanted more representation in the house but the north argued that if blacks weren 't allowed to vote and didn 't have rights they shouldn 't be counted towards house seats. The compromise stated that every slave counted as 3/5ths of a person towards house
The Great Compromise created a new issue concerning slaves and how they would be counted when figuring out a state’s population (Valentine). The Great Compromise required an exact count of the population to decide how many representatives each state would be allowed to have in the lower house. The Southerners wanted to include the slaves which make up about forty-three percent of their population. Doing that they would have many more representatives compared to the Northern states. Northern states had very few slaves, and they did not want the Southern states to gain the advantage of greater representation in the new government.
The Three-Fifths Compromise is between the North and the South. The issue they were arguing over is whether a slave should be counted as a part of the state’s population, which determines how many representatives the state can select. The North had a population mostly that was comprise of white man. They believed that slaves shouldn’t be counted as a person since they were not citizens and didn’t have the rights to vote. However, the South disagreed because the majority of their population was slaves.
The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.
The North should have been more aggressive when it came to the South in regards to slavery”. Another reason why the they shouldn’t done the compromises was because in Article IV, Section 2. This is the fugitive-slave clause which reads:“No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom Service or Labour may be due”. This clause explains that no person held in service (which implied slavery) or labor in one state, and under that state’s laws, can escape into another state and be relieved of his services. Even if a slave escapes to a free state with laws prohibiting slavery, he still must be returned to his rightful owner to whom he owes his services in the slave state.
In 1787, Rutledge stated that “the true question is whether the Southern States will or will not be changed to confederate otherwise… the Southern States will not be confederate at all”. This quote shows that the issue of slavery was a significant factor in the formation of the Constitution and that the authors were willing to compromise on the principle of equality to form a cohesive union. It is important to note that the Constitution did not explicitly mention slavery, but it did include clauses that protected the institution. The Three-Fifths Compromise, for example, counted each slaved person as the three-fifths of a person to determine representation in Congress. This compromise gave Southern states more representation in Congress, which allowed them to maintain a balance of power and protect their interests, including the continuation of
The Northern states, smaller in comparison to the south, already did not have as much representation and political power as the southern states. Therefore, the compromise to them was unnecessary, and they felt they would have all the power and dominate in the polls and decisions. Considering the different views the two already had based on slavery, this alarmed the northern states. However, as time passed, the Three-Fifths Compromise would not provide the advantage the slave owning south had hoped. The Northern states grew more rapidly in terms of population and ended up being opposing political power to others.
After completing the process of the Constitutional Convention, I have learned an exceptional amount of information that can be used to take on the real world. During the convention there were many factors that impacted how the convention was run, and what choices were made. The preliminary discussion topics, the lessons learned, and the factions represented in the convention all modified the ending result. Each of the preliminary discussions with other factions prior to the convention were very important to the final decisions made. Slavery, a very important topic during the convention, was one such example that branched out into other different issues including slave trade and the abolishment of slavery.
The United States in the 1700 used slavery as a common way of generating a mass production of cotton which at the time was a prosperous commodity grown in the new world. The Northern states recognized that slavery was cruel and unjust. Even so, by the time of the American Revolution and eventual adoption of the new Constitution in 1787, slavery was actually a dying institution. As part of the compromises that allowed the Constitution to be written and adopted, the founders agreed to end the importation of slaves into the United States by
But, when these officials were elected to Congress, they passed the “black codes” and thus the relations between the president and legislators became worst (Schriefer, Sivell and Arch R1). These so called “Black Codes” were “a series of laws to deprive blacks of their constitutional rights” that they were enacted mainly by Deep South legislatures. Black Codes differ from a state to another but they were stricter in the Deep South as they were sometimes irrationally austere. (Hazen 30) Furthermore, with the emergence of organizations such as the Red Shirts and the White League with the rise of the Conservative White Democrats’ power, efforts to prevent Black Americans from voting were escalating (Watts 247), even if the Fifteenth Amendment to the U.S constitution that gave the Blacks the right to vote had been ratified in 1870.
This was a gain for the South, in which this got them more seats in the House of Representatives. Although, George Washington wanted slavery to be abolished, as he stated in a letter he wrote to Robert Morris. “I can only say that there is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than I do, to see a plan adopted for the abolition of slavery”. The Three-Fifths Compromise helped preserve slavery in the new Constitution.