Claims of the police using excessive force when dealing with unarmed criminals are common in the United States. The increase in the number of homicides perpetrated by police officers in the line of duty has evoked great indignation across the country. The public demands that police officers are held accountable for their actions when they are on duty. In the United States, police are hardly prosecuted for on-duty homicides, in spite of the high number of murders that the law enforcement agents commit (Cooper 46). Numerous factors stop the judges from prosecuting officers who commit murder while on duty.
The other two are self-defense and use of force to carry out a court order requiring imprisonment.” Force is what police officers are legally allowed to use to apprehend a suspect or gain control of an incident. The article also states when the officer deems it necessary to use force, it has to meet the standard of reasonableness. Then, the ultimate force that an officer can use is deadly force. Deadly force is force that can cause death or great bodily harm but this is restricted to forcible felonies. Additionally, Police use of force.
A severe sin goes beyond verbal actions that society has declared as a minor offence. A severe sin turns verbal offences to physical ones that could result in fatal injuries. Murder would fall under a severe sin and on top of that, it would definitely be considered a crime. Divine law clearly states that, “you shall not kill,” (Exodus 20:13). Society has taken it one step further and elaborated the different degrees of murder.
Everyone needs it for as long as Humanity exists because as humans people create mistakes that can severely harm and hurt others. Law Enforcement has a main reason in life, in why it exists and what exactly it does. It a main job in life, it helps keep people safe in the world today. Law enforcement helps keep criminals away and provides criminal justice. It has made many systems that have helped figure out those who committed crimes (“Law Enforcement” FBI).
Policing holds a great amount of discretion and forcible activity that usually takes place in a private setting. Most of their daily routine including patrols is out of the sight of supervisors. With that being said, the opportunities for misconduct such as corruption are easily obtainable. Lyman defines corruption as “the abuse of police authority for gain” (Lyman, 2010). The types of police corruption are broken into four major categories.
For example, if murders are sentenced to death and are executed, potential murders will double think before killing another for the fear of losing their own lives. In conclusion, the death penalty should be brought back in to action, as it is proven to be a useful tool to maintain criminal behaviour within our societies. With the opinions of professionals and the help of the justice system functioning at a level where innocent individuals are not being wrongly convicted, we will be able to maintain deterrence and retribution within our country. It is very important that our legal system steps up to plate making the death penalty back into action to serve justice properly to those individuals who truly deserve
America’s population today is 323 million people. Even if a small portion of the population can be a massive influence due to social media, news, blogs, and advertisements. There is one problem in particular that has been in America for quite some time, police brutality. Causes of Police Brutality Police brutality is one of several forms of police misconduct, which involves undue violence by police. Police officers are permitted to use force and the public and their superiors expect them to do so.
Deadly force is more of a last resort, or is used when all else fails. Deadly force should be used only in the occasion that an officer’s life or the life of another individual is in danger. Courts have ruled that deadly force may be used under two main criteria, to prevent the escape of a suspect, and that the officer has probable cause of possible serious threat of death/injury to another individual. If a felon is fleeing deadly force is only justified if there is reason to believe serous injury or death to the public or an officer may occur. In cases where a suspect has some sort of deadly weapon officers may use deadly for if the suspect is attempting to cause harm and the use of force is justifiable.
[arguments for] Not only to deter crime but have some form of retribution (justice) for the criminal’s activity. [arguments for] Legal punishment is necessary to have good order and discipline in our society. [argument] When a person commits themselves to carry out a criminal activity they are assuming the responsibility and risk of receiving any type of legal punishment that may be imposed on them. [argument] Capital punishment is the maximum punishment that you can receive. It can be executed in five lawful techniques such as electrocution, hanging, lethal injection, gas chamber, and firing squad.
There are some states to this day that still believe in the use of the death penalty. The states that use them have the intended use of them because they want the people who convict horrible crimes to never see the light of day again. In the usa there are still “31 states that use the death penalty”. The crimes that are convicted to be given the death penalty are murder which is taking the life of another human, treason which is betraying one 's country, drug trafficking which separates drugs everywhere through states, and last but not least espionage which is spying on one 's country or people. Some of the states that allow the death penalty in their state are Florida, Kentucky, Virginia, South Carolina, Arizona , Alabama, Utah ,Washington , California, Arkansas,Tennessee.
The use of lethal force by police is subject to societal, strategic and tactical considerations that inform choices in the field. While many factors are the same for all force options, the tactical purpose in the use of lethal force is distinct. A key question is not whether a killing was justified but if it was avoidable. In deciding to use lethal force, expectations that police are able to make nuanced choices are questionable. It is necessary to distinguish excessive from lethal force.
Stage 5: Lethal Force Officers deploy lethal force when they believe their own life is at risk or when a member of societies life is at risk (Butler, n.d., p. 3). The primary lethal force method that most officers rely on is their primary or secondary firearm (Butler, n.d., p. 8). Use of Force Issues Uses of force issues have always been present within the world of policing. Recently, there has been more light shed on this particular issues. With all the media and social activist groups police have to be more careful of their conduct.
When looking at the distinction between yourself and a police officer look at what differences stand between you. Which one of you has more power? As pioneering scholar Jim Fyfe (1988) argues, “The police are the only American public servant authorized routinely to make quick, unilateral, irreversible decisions that are likely to result in the death of other Americans.” As shown in The President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice, Task Force Report: The Police (Katzenbach et al., 1967) the use of firearms by police in instances to apprehend or arrest subjects is an extremely delicate matter that should be handled with caution. Task Force Report (Katzenbach et al., 1967)) outlines the cases in which deadly force
After reading this case, there were many things that went on in my mind. Qualified immunity is what stood out to me. According to the Legal Information Institute, it states, “Specifically, it protects government officials from lawsuits alleging that they violated plaintiffs’ rights, only allowing suits where officials violated a “clearly established” statutory or constitutional right” (Legal Information Institute). To me, I think when a police officer use any type of force, they are going against that person having constitutional rights. I feel as though police officers think that it is their right to use excessive force when they are in a tough situation such as this.
The use of force becomes necessary and is permitted under unambiguous circumstances; for example, self-defense or defending another group or person (Police use of excessive force, 1999). If it is taken a step further it should not be considered excessive force. For example, a 150lbs officer is being challenged by a 300lbs man and the heavy man rushes towards the officer holding something in his hand; the officer shoots him and kills him. That is not should be considered excessive force. The officer was just doing what he was trained to do; assessing the situation, act within the use of force continuum and protect himself, public and the aggressor.