ipl-logo

Debate Over Taxation And Representation In The Colonies

1081 Words5 Pages

Debate Over Taxation and Representation In the beginning the relationship between the colonies and Britain was amicable. The colonies governed themselves but still remained loyal to Britain. They had a working system of the colonies providing goods to trade with Britain and only Britain while Britain provided protection from other nations interested in colonizing the Americas. This changed after the French and Indian War. The French and Indian war was between Britain and France over land acquisition in North America. Britain came out the victor which meant an expansion of the empire but also a massive amount of debt. With this debt needing to be paid the Britain turned to the solution of taxing the colonists. This switch in government created …show more content…

The right to legal representation in Parliament. As result of self- governing there was no need for colonial representative in Parliament but with the changes being enforced without this legal representation the colonists felt there would be no accuracy in the taxes they would be made to pay. According to the “The Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved” by James Otis the 2nd right states “The supreme national legislative cannot altered justly ‘till the commonwealth is dissolved, nor a subordinate legislative taken away without forfeiture or other god cause.” Otis goes on to say “No representation of the Colonies in parliament alone,… It would be impossible for the parliament to judge so well, of their abilities to bear taxes, impositions on trade, and other duties and burthens, or of the local laws that might be really needful, as a legislative here.” In “The Resolution of the Stamp Act Congress October 1765” by John Dickenson he discusses the fact that the taxes are far too much for the colonists to pay and it would affect their way of life including business with Britain in section XI “That the restrictions imposed by several late Acts of Parliament, on the trade of these colonies, will render them unable to purchase the manufactures of Great- Britain.” In section IX he even states that the taxes “will be extremely burthensome and grievous; and from the scarcity of the specie, the payment of them absolutely impracticable.” However, Soame Jenyns rebuttles this argument in “The Objections to the Taxation of our American Colonies by the Legislature of Great Britain, briefly consider’d” by saying having no legal representation is simply an excuse and other towns also have lack representation in Parliament. The hesitation of the colonists to pay the taxes also led him to question their loyalty to Britain “The towns of Manchester and Birmingham sending no representatives to parliament,

Show More
Related

  • 7 Years War Dbq Analysis

    827 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many colonists were not pleased with the Stamp act. “As to the Stamp Act, tho we purpose doing our endeavor to get it repeal’d. [Document G, Franklin in letter to Hughes]” The Townshend Acts of 1767 were a series of laws which set new import taxes on British goods and used revenues to maintain British troops in America; and to pay the salaries of some Royal officials who were appointed to work in the American colonies. The colonists were not happy with any one of these acts that were inflicted on

    Read More

  • How Did The French And Indian War Alter Political And Ideological Relations

    390 Words  | 2 Pages

    The french and Indian war altered the relationship between Britain and the colonies because they ended the policy of salutary neglect. This led to the increase of authority over the colonies. The debt from the war also lead to taxation without representation. Also they started to strictly regulate

    Read More

  • William Pitt Speech Analysis

    752 Words  | 4 Pages

    The French and Indian War was a big war fought in the northeast between French colonies and British colonies with Indians allies from both side during 1754 and 1763. As a result of this war, England won a lot of territory in North America and Canada. This war was considered part of the Seven Years War that was

    Read More

  • Were The Boston Colonists Justified Questions And Answers

    1031 Words  | 5 Pages

    They wanted the rights to life, liberty and property, as cited in John Locke’s writings (Document 8). The colonies were justified when it came out their rebellion due to the various taxes that did not allow them to have representation for each of them as well as the various attacks the soldiers had upon the people, but in some cases the British crown can

    Read More

  • Settling In The New World Dbq Essay

    1248 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the Declaration of Rights and Grievances issued by the Stamp Act Congress, they claimed that Parliament lacked the power to tax the colonies because they had no representation. While the Stamp Act was repealed, the colonists were never given representation in Parliament. In the “Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms”, issued by the Second Continental Congress, this same issue was cited as a justification for fighting. “[The British declare] that parliament can ‘of right make laws to bind us in all cases whatsoever.’ What is to defend us against so enormous, so unlimited power?”

    Read More

  • The Rights Of The British Colonies Asserted And Proved Summary

    512 Words  | 3 Pages

    After reading the document "The Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved" wrote by James Otis, I agree with the contemporaries of Otis that the document was written to challenge the authority of the king and parliament. In the document, Otis argued in favor of the natural rights. He believed that each individual should carry his or her own judgments; these judgments should be valued regardless of the physical power, wealth or property the individual possesses. He questioned the king and parliament by raising the discussion about the relationship between authority and property; since authority confers property, as he believed, the government should give independence to its people to earn respect and to avoid future conflict. Otis believed that British colonies should have the rights to rule their own land and to protect its people from forced slavery.

    Read More

  • How Did The French And Indian War Lead To The American Revolution

    161 Words  | 1 Pages

    The French and Indian War was won by the British which meant that the French had to get out of North America. One of the issues that came up was that the British, after winning the war, were in debt. It was hard for them to pay for the war so they began to tax the people in Europe and the american colonists. This angered the colonists and brought resentment from the colonists towards the British. This war altered the political, economic, and ideological relations between the British and its American colonies through a series of actions taken by each of the empires involved in this war, more specifically the British.

    Read More

  • Objections To The Taxation Of Our American Colonies

    622 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alex Kinsler Professor Pacholl US History I (to 1865) Section 01G Spring 2018 17 February 2018 Debate Over Taxation and Representation The colonists against Parliament was a true tug of war where each side were trading blows like two heavyweight boxers. British Parliament did not want the colonists to move westward to a new land, and thus created a border among the Appalachian Mountains, which angered the colonists.

    Read More

  • What Is The Relationship Between The Stamp Act And Great Britain

    698 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the Resolutions of the Stamp Act Congress, Dickenson states, “that the increase, prosperity, and happiness of these colonies, depend on the full and free enjoyment of their rights and liberties, and an intercourse with Great Britain mutually affectionate and advantageous’’(XII). The only way the colonies could be happy is if the british allow them their full rights and liberties, and not have laws consistently placed upon

    Read More

  • The Tolerable And Stamp Act Of 1776

    1632 Words  | 7 Pages

    This idea “no taxation without representation” was one of the grievances of the colonists. The colonists were angry that they had no representative in the English Parliament speaking for the American colonists. What this stamp act of 1765 did was it required colonists to use stamped paper to certify payment of taxes on goods like newspapers, legal documents, and diplomas. They weren't willing to pay taxes imposed by the British House of Commons, as they were not represented there. The British argued that there was “Virtual Representation” which was that all British politicians represented all British subjects.

    Read More

  • Were The American Colonies Justified Essay

    959 Words  | 4 Pages

    The idea of “No taxation without representation” was of course violated by the British even though it’s stated in the Magna Carta, they had no protection in Parliament. Giving the colonists no word in what taxes were passed was immensely unfair in regards to their rights. In the Magna Carta it was stated

    Read More

  • Were The Colonists Justified In Declaring Independence Essay

    539 Words  | 3 Pages

    For the rest of the colonists, they believed they had natural rights: rights they were born with. The three main natural rights thought to have were life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness; these were included in the Declaration of Independence. Personal rights were very important to the colonists and they were determined to display how they felt to the government. Overall, this period of time brought dramatic changes to the way of living. All of these changes were necessary for our country to function in the needs of both the government and the

    Read More

  • How Did The French And Indian War Impact The American Revolution

    850 Words  | 4 Pages

    The French and Indian war, also known as the Seven Years’ war, was fought between France and Great Britain. It started because of French expansion into the Ohio Valley. This expansion created conflict

    Read More

  • How Did The Colonists Influence British Policies

    832 Words  | 4 Pages

    British policies established in 1763-1776 greatly affected the colonists and pushed them towards developing their own republican values. All of the acts and taxes the British issued and how overly controlling the British were over the colonists was the starting point, also the increasing rebellions encouraged the colonists to break away from Britain’s rule, and finally the wars that resulted and seizing authority from the British was the final turning point for the colonists in eliminating Britain’s heavy-handed ruling over the colonists. The acts, and taxes that came with most of the acts, that the English imposed on the colonists was a substantial reason the colonists opposed British rule. After the French and Indian war the British found

    Read More

  • Essay On Why Was The French And Indian War Important To The American Revolution

    656 Words  | 3 Pages

    The French and Indian War was important to the American Revolution because the debt from the war was the reason that Parliament started taxing the colonists. Also, the French and Indian War made Britain very weak, making the colonists’ actions work a whole lot better. Since France was not happy with the outcome of their war with Britain this was a main reasons for France’s interest in helping the now Americans throughout the Revolutionary War, which was very important to the colonies’ victory. ​The reason why Britain started to tax the colonists was because of the debt resulting from the French and Indian War. The first tax was the the tax on sugar, which was put on the colonists to help pay off the war debt.

    Read More

More about Debate Over Taxation And Representation In The Colonies

Open Document