The reading states that several measures have been proposed to stop the spread of the cane toad in Australia and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor states that the measures in the reading passage are unsuccessful and cause unwanted damage and refutes each of the authors ' reasons. First, the reading states that one way to prevent the spread of the toad would be to build a national fence. The professor opposes this point by saying that this way will not stop the spread of the cane toad. The professor points out that young cane toads and their eggs live in rivers and streams and water flow young toads from one side of the river to the other side.
Herbivory: Non-native herbivores trample or overgraze vegetation. They may not kill the species they consume, but any removal of vegetation tissue affects its survival capacity (Smith & Smith, 2009). 3. Predation: Killing of weaker native species, possibly leading to extinction. 4.
The lecturer and the reading passage offer two theories to explain why the sea otter population is in rapid decline. The two theories are predation theory and pollution theory. The professor argues predation is the more likely cause than pollution because of the absence of dead sea otters washing up on shores. However, the reading passage attributes the decline of the sea otters population based on evidence of increased ocean contaminates leading to greater vulnerability to infections. Also, the lecturer argues that orcas are likely factors in the population decline of the sea otters because of the scarcity of their usual prepay.
Once the fetus was checked illness or disable, it was then immediately killed. It violates the humanity and also can be seen as a discrimination of humankind. With the times pass by, there will be more and more intelligent people but the diversity of human will be deceased. Human diversity was created by the mutation of a gene, with this, everyone so to become unique and irreplaceable. Furthermore, human diversity plays a vital role in human for adapting and survival to an environment If eugenics is applied to the society, people will not be able to handle situation out of the blue.
Humans are more likely to be able to save frogs than koalas. The reasons are that frogs habitats are getting destroyed. Second the over growing population of people is having fadal consequences on the frogs. Lastly according to the article “Project Frog” pesticides and weed killers from farming are getting washed up in the frog ponds and streams. First frogs habitats are getting destroyed by buildings getting constructed.
Due to poaching, your favorite animals might be getting killed each day slowly decreasing their population, even though there are laws that are supposed to prevent this. Studies show that thousands of animals are getting killed each year and the hunters are not getting enough discipline for their actions. Though, they should not get the death penalty, they should at least get some type of restraint. Although many people think poachers should not get extreme punishment for their crimes, poaching laws should become harsher because killers are not getting enough retribution, people are wearing animals as clothes, and species are getting endangered. Some may say that poachers should not get death penalty for their crimes: however, many people do not realize that the hunters are not getting enough punishment.
What I aim for is to convince other conservationists from different organisations and even countries to stop defending pandas. I want people who donate money to understand why they must not do it. And There are the reasons. One of the major problems pandas had to face is climate change. It cannot be avoided by pandas as they are really bad at adapting to the environmental change, this can lead to their extinction.
Since these types of industries would go broke and run out of business, resulting in the release of captivated, and halting the misplace of animals from their natural habitats in the future, giving them the life they were meant to live from the start. One should not sit down and complain, but rather get up and petition, and stop investing in tickets. A wise man once said, “Actions speak louder than words,”(Lincoln) get up and stand for the animals rights. These are multiple factors that affect the animal 's emotional state; however, by the end of the day, the root cause is from the
There have been many ideas about elephant poaching and if it should be continued. “A ban would not save the elephant either. In fact, it would do the opposite and probably hasten its extinction in the wild” (MacMillan). MacMillan believes that banning ivory does not help the elephants survive that it actually causes them to die quicker. This idea could work and help elephants survive for a longer time because ivory will be less expensive and people would want it less since it’s not banned anymore.
Lastly, there are ethical issues relating to the methods of collecting, euthanasia and disposing of the toads. An example of this is that freezing was one the principle method of killing but has since been ruled as inhumane (Robert Taylor, 2012) . How does the future look? Without a solution, the cane toad invasion will become an extremely serious issue. They will continue to spread throughout Australia, causing more significant impacts on the environment, which will make it much harder to eradicate the issue over time.
My first point is that the Delta Smelt stopped pumping water for farmers to use. For this reason, crops are drying up with no water. Also, less food is being grown such as vegetables and fruits. If less food is being grown that means that food prices in the grocery stores will increase. If we don’t help the farmers get the water they need our whole environment will not be in good conditions.