A deductive design might test to see if this relationship or link did obtain on more general circumstances” (Gulati, 2009: 42). In other words, when a deductive approach is being followed in the research the author formulates a set of hypotheses that need to be tested. Then, through implementation of relevant methodology the study is going to prove formulated hypotheses right or wrong. Sneider and Larner (2009) inform that in deductive approach reasoning starts with a theory and leads to a new hypothesis, which is going to be confirmed or rejected as a result of the
RULES OF INFERENCE IN NATURAL DEDUCTION Natural deduction is a technique that is used to try to prove that some reasoning is correct or to check the validity of a certain sequent. This technique has two positions; a set of rules put in place to construct proofs of tautologies in an orderly manner and the application method of these rules. Natural deduction mostly has or uses two kinds of rules which are the rules of replacement and the rules of inference. In the rules of inference as our main point, (moura, 2010) defines it as a template for building a valid argument. A set of rules can be put in place to infer any of the conclusion that are valid if they are complete and not inferring to a conclusion that is invalid.
1. The difference between Post-Empiricism and Critical Rationalism: Critical Rationalism has been discussed to, as the system of falsification. A point is a form of rationalism insofar as it embraces knowledge (or other psychological state and capabilities) about some specific subject matter, drives from the use of reason or more commonly from the rational nature (Kuhn, 1970:231). Rationalism is the view that rational instincts are the most essential way of obtaining knowledge (Dick, 1993:53). whereas a Post-Empiricism is the desertion of firm empirical approaches by recent empiricists.
Unfortunately, the modal infallibilism is also known to be a source of skeptical argument. Nonetheless, the paper argues that whether the arguments are sound they all depend on significant questions regarding the semantic of alethic modals and the metaphysics of possibility. Despite the arising issues, modal infallibilism is an aspect that individuals will have to accept. Work cited Churchland, Paul M. Matter, and consciousness.MIT Press, 2013. Pp.
Reality is also the major concept that is focused in this philosophy (Flyvbjerg et al., 2012). Based on the research philosophies’ implications and the hypothesis of the research, an interpretivism philosophy will be used. The reason is that this will be comparing the observations and results of new data with previous trends independently. Furthermore, exploration of social authenticity might be achieved by using interpretivism research philosophy, as the topic is subjective. On the other hand, alternative philosophies are remarkably quantifiable and literature extensive, which makes a study general.
However, one must be careful in making deductions, because the theory must show the truth. The testing of the theory is done by the “scientific method.” Usually, after more than one theory is postulated, the scientific method is then applied to eliminate the impossible and think of
If you are too ambiguous and unclear, your self-disclosures may not be “heard” as real disclosure(Pj Boardman, 2012). Third is to be consistent with your verbal and nonverbal communication. Nonverbal communication should reinforce, not contradict, your verbal communication(Pj Boardman, 2012). Fourth is to estimate the risks and benefits. To be competent in self-disclosure, you need to be able estimate and balance its risk and benefits(Pj Boardman, 2012).
A rule consists of an antecedent (body of the rule) and a consequent (head of the rule). The antecedent contains conditions combined using logical operators while the consequent part contains conclusions. If the rule statement(s) are true, new knowledge is added to the knowledge base. Informally, the rule can be read as: if the body is true, then the head must be true [Birte et.al. 2009].
This clearly gives the readers a line of reasoning and basis as to why we should move grounded theory further into postmodernism. He expounds on the importance of discourse analysis, and he tries explains how one can analyze discourse. Each section of this article has merit and readable and understandable. The author tried to balance the article that with inventive and creative practical applications in his article, He used appropriate literature, and good scholarly writing. Weakness However this article provides an argument as to the benefits of using grounded theory and builds a rational line of reasoning in defence of the argument.