Shahad Jadallah English 1301 Ms. Dies 20 October 2015 Social Classes In my analysis of Dee Dee Myers’s “Politico”, I argue that the article does not meet the standards for publication in The Shorthorn for many reasons. In the article Myers only gives one side of the argument; she makes the wealthy republicans seem that they get so many benefits with taxes and that they don’t want to help anyone else besides themselves. Since Myers is a democrat she lacks some input from the republican side to balance out the argument. In this biased article, Myers is trying to persuade the reader to what she believes. I believe that the University of Texas at Arlington community likes to read an argument that shows both sides of the story so they can pick a …show more content…
When Myers explained how tax structure is, she said, “the 400 Americans with the highest adjusted gross income saw their effective tax rates plummet from 30 percent in 1995 to 17 percent in 2007” (par.14). Myers tells us that the reason for this is because some big companies, like General Electric in 2010, don’t pay corporate taxes, and still benefit from millions of dollars in government subsidies. The people should know where their tax dollars are going, and to show that most of the time we don’t even benefit from what we pay for taxes, it’s the big companies and wealthy class that get the benefits. The Shorthorn readers may find it important to know how much they are spending on taxes and where their tax dollars are going, but Myers doesn’t provide enough information to back her …show more content…
This advantage is to help out the middle class, but most of the time it’s helping the people that don’t need it, the wealthy. Myers tells us, the reader, that some people in middle class can’t get this advantage when she says, “low- and middle-income earners are less likely to itemize deductions…the biggest benefit to people who buy the most expensive homes…lower brackets pay lower rates” (par. 17, 19, 20). To the readers of The Shorthorn, it’s good to know that there are things that could help with tax deductions. The readers are not provided with examples to prove that this set of information is true. Myers talks a lot about what the middle class should receive, but doesn’t tell us anything on what the wealthy want. Myers makes the wealthy seem like they do all these things on purpose, or to hurt the middle class, she needs to add more input on a wealthy person’s point of
In “House Passes Tax Bill, as Does Senate Panel” by Thomas Kaplan and Alan Rapperport, both belong to the upper class and are affected by the newly passed bill, suggest that the tax bill passed by Republicans is negatively affecting individuals that are already in the lower class. Kaplan and Rapperport develops their claim by first stating the cause and effect of this bill that, “...actually raises taxes on low-income Americans within a few years”(Kaplan, Rapperport). Secondly, quoting the Senator of Maryland, “You’ve targeted the relief to help the wealthy, and the middle-income families are going to get stuck with it” (Cardin). Kaplan and Rapperport's purpose is to reveal the consequences of the bill in order to explain how it changes the
Justin Trudeau’s number one goal is to reduce tax rates for “middle-class” income people and increase tax rates for the wealthy who are earning
Politics. What does it do to us and our views of people? In “Divided We Now Stand,” Susan Page, the current Washington Bureau Chief for USA today, explains just that. She spends the article giving readers studies and insights as to how people oppose simply because the party says to oppose, and she shows us how people feel about opposing parties and treat them as a result of partisan views. In this article, Page has many good points and strategies, but her argument could be improved.
In the article, “Little Difference Between Sanders and Trump,” Star Parker establishes her argument that Sanders and Trump are practically identical despite their opposing political parties by opening her article with the controversy of whom the people of South Carolina should support-- Sanders or Trump. She supports her argument by giving statistics, [logos] then discloses her personal experience about when she switched from a Democrat to a Republican. Ultimately, Parker compares Sanders and Trumps beliefs on where our “massive fiscal imbalance” originated. Also, throughout the article Parker uses pathos in order to make her audience feel irrelevant if the are Democrats, further proving her point that Democrats are responsible for America’s
history but it provokes an angry reaction from the American Left. The bill reduced personal income tax rates by 25 percent in three annual increments, cut capital gains and estate taxes, and reduced business taxes.” The illogical point was cutting taxes as the same rate for everyone. While several industries and high income earners received numerous benefits, low income earners still suffered financial burden because of “trickle-down economics.” In fact, federal income tax rates cut significantly for the wealthiest 20 percent of taxpayers.
The article I picked from The Washington Post is about Sarah Henderson, a woman in Texas who shot her two children. Jacob Henderson, the father of the 5 and 7-year-old girls had called the police at 11:30 that evening because he believed his wife was suicidal. A few minutes later he called again and said that his wife was fine and not to send anyone out. At about 2:30 in the morning the woman’s husband called the police yet again, this time because his wife had shot their daughters. In the 9-1-1 audio, the wife can be heard saying “What did I do” & “Why did I do that”.
However, this is not true it can be seen all over different part of the united states where wealthy suburbs are built where poverty is just help the city. The idea of trickle down economics is that by doing this it will help motivate the people to something or try harder. The fact is that in some way that is the best that some people can do and that just the truth. Beverly 3 In Laura’s family case being wealthy is a sign of stature and appetence which be one of the treason why the party did not stop.
One of the arguments used is that we could regulate and tax the 1% income because that would be “fair” but these numbers show how harmful that way of thinking is. 18% of taxes for the “bottom” of the bracket which is around 20% of the U.S population.
They believe taxes are first and foremost a means of redistributing income, and therefore strenuously oppose any system that lowers tax rates at upper income levels.”
If a wealthy individual pays a higher tax, then there post-tax income would more closely resemble that of a lower income individual who pays a lower tax. Obviously, they would not be completely equal, but they would be closer than they would be without the progressive tax. As co-founder of Microsoft, Bill Gates, states in his article Why Inequality Matters , “High levels of inequality are a problem—messing up economic incentives, tilting democracies in favor of powerful interests, and undercutting the ideal that all people are created equal.” Keeping with the progressive tax is the first step in resolving income
(Kennedy 2015) Thankfully, when it comes to Trudeau’s situation many upper-class citizens are more than happy to pay more than what they were paying for before. This will assist the middle class because they will not have to pay as much as they were before to help the economy. “And if the rich do what they can for the poor, even within reasonable limits of self-sacrifice, then they will give away rather a lot of their money, and community will indeed obtain, but inequality will be reduced.” (Cohen 2009)
Plus, analyzing the writing style can reveal any persuasive techniques or rhetorical devices they’ve used to make their argument even more
In “Fact Checker: Clinton’s claim that illegal immigrants pay more taxes than some corporations,” Glenn Kessler, writer for The Washington Post, says that Clinton claims that “illegal immigrants in New York pay more taxes than some of the biggest corporations New York”(Hillary Clinton). This is true if you are taking illegal immigrants as a group and not each individual person; this comparison is not accurate though because it like comparing apples and bananas. Also, the numbers being taken into account are only state, local, and property taxes which excludes federal taxes (Kessler, 2). Even though big companies can find ways to get out of paying a lot of federal taxes, they still pay a ton of money into state, local, and property, which forces them to pay for each individual property they own. So when you compare a whole group of people to one company, yes, the group would be paying more, but that is an unrealistic comparison to make.
That is not reducing the tax rate, we’re just making the middle pay more than the rich, and right now that is what is exactly happening. I know that most wealthy people work hard for their money, but we have people in the lower class barely getting by while the wealthy people throw around hundred dollar bills and don’t care about what anyone else thinks. They waste their money on things they don’t need while people in the lower classes struggle everyday. People that have financial disadvantages live paycheck to paycheck while the wealthy people just walk around with lots of money that they’ll waste on things they don’t need such as gold marbled tiles or million dollar perfumes. The least they can do is give a little back to the
Why must the rich pay more tax to help the poor? Although taxing more on rich seems unfair for the rich, it is necessary that rich people should pay more tax and the amount they pay are based on their incomes. First of all, the important reason that can be presented is that the rich people have utilized the public system more. As Elizabeth Warren said, "There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody.”