Defendant Jackson Case

Albert Roger’s, 26 year’s old, was arrested and charged with the murder of Joshua Tucker who was just 31 year’s old. It is alleged the two men had an ongoing conflict about a dog. When officers arrived on the scene Tucker was found shot in the driveway. He was pronounced dead at the scene of the crime. Police did recover a firearm at the scene of the crime. (Daniel S. Comiskey, 2015)

This is a criminal case, in which the Supreme Court ruled that there was no probable cause to arrest Hayes. Hayes did not give consent to be taken to the police station and be detained plus fingerprint. Therefore, Hayed Fourth Amendment rights were violated and the conviction was overturned.

Andrew Jackson should not have been court-martialed for seizing control of two Spanish forts. To begin, in 1818 General Andrew Jackson took control of two Spanish forts in Spanish East Florida without permission to do so. Jackson had only been ordered to end Seminole attacks on American land in Florida. Because of this, John Calhoun demanded that Andrew Jackson be court-martialed. President Adams ,however, disagreed. He agreed that it was not right of Jackson to initiate military action, but argued that the American people would be greatly upset by a court-martialing of Jackson, their hero. As President, Adams knew the importance of pleasing the people. In addition to this, Adams also argued that because Jackson’s actions had not caused any

In September of 1961, a woman from District of Columbia had an intruder break into her apartment. While the invader of the home was there, they had taken her wallet, and also raped the woman. During the investigation of the crime, the police had found some latent fingerprints in the apartment. The police then established and processed the prints. The prints were then connected back to 16 year old Morris A. Kent. The prints the connected back to when Kent was first entering the system back in 1959 for his earlier crimes. Kent at this time had already been on probation due to crimes committed two years prior to this case. Morris Kent at the age of 14, had first come into contact with breaking the law when he was placed on probation for breaking

The author, Chris Crowe, wrote a historical fiction novel titled, Mississippi Trial 1955, which took place in Greenwood, MISS. In the story, Hiram Hilburn goes to spend summer vacation with his Grandfather in Greenwood, Mississippi. The main story of the book is the murder of Emmett Till, and the trial that occurs after.

Yesterday, Sloan Jackson, age 18 was put on trial for stealing a shirt from Famous Fashions in Merchandise Mall. He supposedly ran out of the store with a lump (which was the same color as the stolen shirt) in his jacket to go to Record Mart because there was a big sale going on. He then was found sitting next to the yogurt stand and the shirt was found in a trash barrel near the yogurt stand. He then ran away from the security guard but he was in the end caught and brought back to the store to return the shirt. At the trial yesterday the jury came to a verdict of being guilty after talking in the jury room for about 10 minutes. He could possibly be sentences to 4 years in prison or he might need to pay a fine of up to $2,000 or both.

While President Jackson might’ve been remembered as a national hero, with his image being immortalized onto the $20 bill, I believe that President Jackson was simply bad at his job of managing the United States, and should be guilty all for the crimes he performed. Not only did President Jackson introduce the spoils system, a method of assigning government positions simply to any person who supported one’s campaign, whether or not they were good at the job, but Jackson also jeopardized the entirety of the US’ economy, leading up to the Panic of 1837, and finally, committed atrocious crimes against the indigenous Native Americans who lived there. While he was viewed as a champion of the people, he should be remembered as a terrible president,

A warrant was issued for a search of the home of Richard Simpson. Officers set up a surveillance of the home on March 27, 1995, Mrs. Simpson left the home at 10:15AM to take her son to school. Upon returning home Mrs. Simpson was detained by Office Conzachi. Once Mrs. Simpson was at the surveillance site a sheriff’s deputy made a call to Richard Simpson informing him that his wife had been in an accident and he needed to respond to the scene to make arrangements for the vehicle. Leaving the residence Mr. Simpson was stopped and detained by officer Conzachi. Officer Conzachi asked Mr. Simpson if there were any guns on the property. Mr. Simpson says there is one gun under his mattress. The gun may or may not be loaded. Mr. Simpson admitted the gun is a .380 caliber automatic. Officer Conzachi is informed by Mr. Simpson that there is on child and a nanny still in the home along with 14 Rottweilers which are attack dogs. Orange County Animal Control is sent to the home to secure the animals and a search was conducted on the home. The gun was located along with 67.24 grams of marijuana. Mr. Simpson is placed under arrest.

During the early to mid 1900s there was a lot of racism, especially in the southern United States. This is expressed more inside the court cases of the time. While lots of these ended poorly for defendant, it was often because of the color of their skin, not because they were guilty. In fact many times the defendant was actually innocent.

The case of the century, the one that everyone made sure to keep up on through the many months it was on; “People of the State of California vs. Orenthal James Simpson.” This case is one that nobody will forget. There were many months of blood, sweat, and tears put in by both sides for the final verdict, O.J. Simpson had been found not guilty.

Does one have the right to kill his or his family member (wife and children) or an unwanted relationship to just get out of one? If it seem the only way out of such relationship without it highly Impact one life? Well A highly-publicized incident is well know of one which is Peterson was convicted to the death in 2005 for the homicide of his wife, Laci Peterson, and their unborn child in California.

At the tender age of 16, Jon Roberts without having a mother or father, he moved from place to place and later became an enforcer for a loan-sharking operation which was run by his uncle in Staten Island, New York. He was arrested for dealing cocaine and taken to the tombs in New York City. After being arrested for kidnapping, Roberts was given the opportunity to join the military to have his criminal record expunged as he served with the 101st Airborne for a period of one (1) year in Vietnam with the condition of being honorably discharged. Due to an explosion Roberts was injured and had to have a metal plate in his head. Roberts worked for members of the New York Mafia as an enforcer and club manager.

The life and murder of Jessica Lunsford, was a very senseless crime that never should have happened in the first place. This 9yr old little girl granted didn’t have a very good childhood but to some kids it was better that she could ever get, I feel for this kid! Her mom and separated and cannot get alone even if they tried too.

The reason O.J. was found not guilty of murder and acquitted in criminal court, but found guilty of the tort of harm and ordered to pay damages in the civil court lies in the structure of our legal system, in regards to criminal cases and civil cases. The distinct difference between criminal cases and civil cases provides further explanation regarding the O.J. Simpson case. Criminal cases deal with crimes against society. It is the government, not the victim, who brings action against the charged individual. In criminal cases, the penalties can include a number things including jail time. Since the stakes are so high in these cases, there is a high burden of proof on the prosecution. The prosecution must prove the defendant’s guilt “beyond

Non Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997 section 2 states : " A person shall be guilty of the offence of assault who without lawful excuse intentionally or recklessly :a)directly or indirectly applies force to or causes an impact on the body of another causes another to believe on reasonable grounds that he or she is likely immediately to be subjected to any such force or impact without the consent of the other " . Following this with the incident between Murt and Bernie , Murt agrees to take part in an incident that could cause harm to himself as well as impact from the body of another . However in section 3 A person who assaults another causing him or her harm shall be guilty of an offence . Section 4 then states a person or intentionally