How To Deny Human Rights Essay

INTRODUCTION

“To deny people their Human Rights is to challenge their very humanity” said by Nelson Mandela. The lines perfectly describe the situation that is been discussed in this paper i.e., whether religion should be cherished at the cost of human rights that a person has been given by the mere fact of being human. The present topic is concerned with the judgment that has been given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on the validity of Fatwa which are given by Shairat Courts.

The course through which the judgment given by the Apex Court is been respected in this paper by firstly explaining how the human rights are the very prior objective in Islam; then moving to how these fatwas are just the opinion and not binding in nature.

Then finally moving to the conclusion as to how the judgment given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court is requisite in the present social, economical and political situation of our country.

HUMAN RIGHTS IS ABOVE RELIGION

Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, whatever our nationality, place of residence, sex, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, language, or any other status. We are all equally entitled to our human rights without discrimination this is the motive that has been described under Universal

So a fatwa can be imposed when the matter is related to any religious purpose and the most important thing to be seen here is that a fatwa is considered as an opinion and not a binding nature obligation. The bench headed by CK Prasad ruled ‘The fatwa has no legal status in our Constitution. It is an opinion, given by an expert. It is not a decree, not binding on the court or the State or the individual. Also its not been sanctioned under our constitutional.’ So what does not fall into the preview of our constitutional scheme cannot be considered as a legal obligation that a person has to