ipl-logo

Democracies: The Ancient City Of Corinth

581 Words3 Pages

Democratic regimes have an interesting mix of features. Some of these features seem to be contradictory while others are complementary. Democracies tend to be liberal in their orientation and as a result, they tend to become more and more immoral. The ancient city of Corinth is a great example of this. The city was liberal and wealthy, but with all of that came a flood of immorality. There also tends to be an instability that is built into this regime because when the demos rule they do so through their passions. When the passions of the people and rulers vacillate there tends to be great instability. We observe this in Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian War, where he records how the people of Athens in one moment love and adore Pericles and in the next they turn on him. Democracies tend to follow the passions of the people, one moment the people want to go in one direction or to follow after one leader and in the next moment they turn. …show more content…

The equality of nature and resources. But as a strange anomaly democracies tend to make citizens greater than the city. One example might be Themistocles and another might be Pericles, who was considered by some to be the "First citizen" of Athens. But an odd byproduct of democracy, is even though it can make some citizens greater than the city and even allows for the philosopher, those who become great in a democracy will tend to be ostracized or demonized because in the end no one is allowed to be better than anyone else. This is a form or radical

Show More
Related

  • Was Ancient Athens: Was Ancient Athens Truly Democratic?

    335 Words  | 2 Pages

    Was ancient Athens truly democratic? Democracy is a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state. I do not believe that in the 4th to 5th century BCE ancient Athen were democratic for many reasons.

    Read More

  • A Primary Text Analysis: The Funeral Oration Of Pericles

    664 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Funeral Oration of Pericles: A Primary Text Analysis In Pericles’ Funeral Oration, the famous and influential text in 430 B.C was given by Pericles to traditionally honor the death of the soldiers that fought in war and serviced in the Athenian military. This interpretation of the oration is written by Thucydides, as it is a manuscript of what Pericles said to the Athenian public. Through this text, Pericles focuses on honoring the fallen soldiers, but he also emphases the values of Athenian society and the social structure of the invention of democracy, as it is introduced for the first time ever in history. The Funeral Oration of Pericles expresses the distinct values of strong moral standards for social structure and introduces democracy, as it reinforces laws and the need for equal justice.

    Read More

  • How Did Rome Influence America

    1112 Words  | 5 Pages

    First, Pericles strongly promoted the benefits of an organized democracy at a funeral orientation for fallen Roman soldiers. He cried, “While every citizen has an equal opportunity to serve the public, we rewarded our most distinguished citizens by asking them to make our political decisions” (2). This encouraged citizens to work hard. They elected people to office similarly to how Americans elect people for office today. The Greek democracy heavily impacted the modern day American democracy because every citizen has an equal opportunity to serve the public and make important political decisions.

    Read More

  • What Impact And Influence Did Pericles Have During His Time?

    1477 Words  | 6 Pages

    In short, what was nomically a democracy was becoming in his hands government by the first citizen”. -

    Read More

  • Democracy In Ancient Athens

    527 Words  | 3 Pages

    I believe that ancient Athens was not a true democracy. In a democracy all of the people are able to vote, and have a choice on who runs their city. In ancient Athens only the men were able to vote. Their government was Demokratia, and this excluded the women, the children, the metics, and the slaves. Even though their government was ran by the people themselves, only the men in the city could vote.

    Read More

  • Ancient Greece Source Analysis

    815 Words  | 4 Pages

    Additionally, the reliability affected by the emotive language being employed in this article as the author utilises this language it demonstrates that bias is present. This article was useful to my essay as it provided detailed information on the gaps in Athenian democracy. Moreover, the article provided a perspective that highlighted the differences in Athenian democracy such as that Athens was a direct democracy and that only some of the population was eligible, it mainly created a feeling that Athens was advanced for its time however the system had discrepancies. This information provided significantly when comparing modern societies to ancient Greece and also in justify as to why democracy was significant to Greece. A source that shares this view is the Ted-Ed video this also similarly to historian Paul Cartledge states that Athens was a direct democracy and also that not all of the population had the right to

    Read More

  • Athens Was Not A Democracy Dbq Analysis

    1356 Words  | 6 Pages

    In a true democracy, nothing is random. Everyone should have a vote and the right to voice their thoughts. With this system they have put in place, people’s roles in the government are completely arbitrary. Thus proving, Athens was not a true democracy because government roles were picked at

    Read More

  • Athenian Democracy Vs American Democracy

    983 Words  | 4 Pages

    When you look at the literal definition of democracy in the Merriam-Webster dictionary, there is a decently large explanation. When looking at this definition and trying to decide whether the Athenian democratic system was truly democratic, one would have to go with the answer no. While it has been stated that Athens is the “cradle of democracy”, and that it was better than any of the other governments in the world, it was still a work in progress. The Athenian democracy, while it did give more power to the people, still left a lot of citizens out. The current American democracy may have steamed from Athens, but they do not really have that much in common.

    Read More

  • What Is The Difference Between Democracy, Oligarchy And Democracy

    967 Words  | 4 Pages

    As far as democracy is concerned, critics of democracy, such as Thucydides and Aristophanes, both are pinpointing on that the demos in which that they thought that it could be too easily swayed by a good orator or popular leaders the firebrand and get carried away with their emotions. Democracy Democracy in Athens the government officials are chosen by sweepstakes and worked for 1 year for proposing and enforcing decrees but didn’t have much individual power. Democracy in Athenian government the way that the citizens pass a vote is getting done, in elected by the assembly annually for making decisions about military matters and by showing hands.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Ancient Athenian Democracy

    298 Words  | 2 Pages

    Democracy, a form of government, allows the people in their own nationality to vote for people in order for them to become representatives as a result to vote on new laws that would affect their own nationality. One of the many states of Greece, ancient Athens was indeed not truly democratic as a result of not inclusive, other than male citizens, to gain authority in ancient Athens, ¨Demokratia was ruled by male citizens only, excluding women, free foreigners(Metics) and slaves.¨(Document D), therefore ruling Athens was only accessible to male citizen since since women, free foreigners(Metics), and slaves were not allowed to rule as a result of not being male citizens. One of the many states of Greece, ancient Athens, was indeed not truly democratic as a result of not even using the essentials of democracy that is used today, “Thus, by our standards, it was oligarchy, not democracy.¨(Document D), therefore ancient Athens was not using democracy as their form of government, they were using oligarchy,another form of government in which a small group of people has power and control, as their form of government instead of democracy.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Citizenship: Why Athens Was The Better System

    504 Words  | 3 Pages

    Unlike the Romans, Athenians had a strict but fair schedule that allowed them to enjoy citizenship equally. Equally, hard workers have brought Athens power just as much as hereditary leaders. According to Document B all citizens should be allowed to speak their opinion and have a share in election because of the hard work they do to make the city powerful. Athenians allowed poor and common men to win a position in government which was a transition from the wealthy having power to everyone having power.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Arete In Ancient Greece

    1134 Words  | 5 Pages

    While some, like Plato in his The Republic, thought it weak to give government into the hands of the common people, Pericles countered this argument with a compelling argument of greatness. By putting government into the hands of the people, the people are united and more devoted to their country. Democracy bonds the people together in a way that no other government can understand. Pericles confidently states, “Athenians advance unsupported into the territory of a neighbor, and fighting upon a foreign soil usually vanquish with ease men who are defending their homes.”

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Ancient Greek And Roman Democracy

    1489 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Romans had a system of indirect democracy where the people had the power to vote for representatives who would advocate for them on the state level. The Greeks had a government in which the people directly were involved in the governmental and legislative process. In addition, both systems were flawed in their representation of their people in their respective governments through neglecting a large portion of their population. Both societies did well to create term lengths to decrease the likelihood of corruption and abuse of power through creating accountability. However, the Greek democracy was a caliber above its counterpart.

    Read More

  • Why Was Athens Successful

    875 Words  | 4 Pages

    Athens organized a group of Greek city states into the Delian League and eventually lead and dominated all of the city states in the League. Athens’s military prowess allowed them to look down on the other members of the League and treat them as members of an empire instead of equals. This caused some to view them with hostility which sparked the conflicts between Athens and Sparta that lead to the Peloponnesian War. The direct democracy of Athens wasn’t actually as inclusive and steady as the statement at Pericles 's funeral state, “Our Constitution is called a democracy because power is in the hands not of a minority but of the whole people (Doc C).” In fact, of the 450,000 citizens of Athens in 430 BC, only about 40,000 people had the power to vote.

    Read More

  • Athens: The Limitations Of Athenian Democracy

    456 Words  | 2 Pages

    the idea of representative government began to take root in some city states, specifically Athens. Athenian reformers moved toward democracy, rule by the people. In Athens citizens participated directly in political decision making. However there were limitations on citizenship to ensure that only the most rational people were able to vote. Through the construction of democracy in Athens, equality of all citizens became greater, and the city would become the top democracy of all the democracies.

    Read More

More about Democracies: The Ancient City Of Corinth

Open Document