The State is the dominant organization in the country, which is headed by the Government and other bodies. Let’s consider word - government from two sides. We will discuss two ideologies which are belonging to Locke and Hobbes. These ideologies have similar sources, but finally have very different views of ideal government. Thomas Hobbes, he is known for his brilliant work Leviathan, where the state, like sea monster, sucked all the rights and freedom of the people, where people have become part of the state mechanism.
Federal states and stateless territories. Absolute monarchy in other words absolutism is when a ruler or leader has ultimate authority to run a state and the ruler ruled by Devine right. Devine right was the claim that a king was given his position by some higher power. The authority of the monarchy included the following areas administration, taxes, justice and foreign policy. In an absolute monarchy decisions
Theoretical, this type of government allows the people to vote to elect rulers to govern on their behalf, this liberty brings happier and productive life. On the other hand, in the totalitarianism, the government ruled by a single person with complete power. In this form of government, the citizens’ will are not taking in the consideration. Even we could say that to totalitarianism is the regime where the public is committed to silence. Moreover, totalitarianism not only canceled the citizens’
Totalitarianism is about simple power whereas in fascism everything is done for preserving notion’s integrity. 2. Totalitarian states give equal importance to military and economic planning while fascist state gives more importance to military planning than economic. 3. Totalitarianism holds the authoritative power throughout the state while fascism beholds a great power to control any anti-regime activity.
A republic is a democracy in which either the people or representatives that the people have chosen hold the power and make decisions. All liberal democracies must have a judiciary which are the courts, executive which are the presidents and prime ministers and legislative which is the parliament. The executive and legislative part of the government is run by one or more parties. The ideal liberal democracy consists of several features which give the people the power but not a single country can truly say that they are a fully working liberal democracy as there will always by violations of the people’s
Dictatorships and the Separation of Powers An occurring dictatorship, lacks three possessions, the executive, judicial (court) and the legislative. Additionally, these powers/terms are dependent on the individual dictator. The dictator has total control over the three branches, moreover the ability to dominate the authority of everything. The terms/powers determines a democratic system, if dependent similarly to be a dictator, whereas independent, the system becomes a democracy. The executive term of the government is the executing of laws, to compel observance of the law, responsible for planning and supplying the laws made by the legislative.
Furthermore, would creating one authoritarian organisation enable democracy or rather destroy it? Would reducing the political actors be a democratization practice after all? We can see where the argument of not desirability enters along with non-feasibility. Last but not least as Archibugi (1998) reasons in the book ‘Re-Imagining Political Community: Studies In Cosmopolitan Democracy’ “there is no actual guarantee that the greater coordination in world politics will be informed by the values of
Pwint Yune Phyu (Sherry Huang) Mr. Nick Sturmey World Studies September 20, 2016 Word Count: 750 Constitutional Monarchy Prevails Democracy When concerning the issue of managing a country, it all comes down to whether or not people prefer to make decisions for themselves or to have leader guide and take charge. Democracy, and ideology which depends on numerous individuals, would allow influence and instigates corruption. Constitutional monarchy should be broadly accepted since it ensures the prosperity and development of a country from the utilization of hierarchy, probable growth in economy, and reliance on a leader born and bred with the highest possible education to rule instead of an elected representative chosen directly by the people.
when choosing they look not just to the person but to the group , and even that the head of the state is lack of power but still the prime minster less important than him . the ability to judge and change the government give the parliamentary the chance to change it when it's not doing its job . The democracy in letting the people choose the president which let them feel that they have the choice . that the president have a stabled period of time in his position they can't change him till its finish unlike the other governmental positions under this system . the separation of the power , which give the president the ability to make a quick decisions .
The kind of democracy that will guarantee a good quality life would be the ones that all the government power is given unto the citizen to exercise. While the kind of democracy that should be emphasized in Thai society should be coping with the inequality gap between the peasants and elites and the weak rules of law which brought in corruptions. Democracy is a government in which power and responsibility are vested in the people and exercised by them. According to Abraham Lincoln, democracy is a government "of the people, by the people, and for the people". Although the terms democracy and freedom are often used interchangeably, they are not the same; democracy is individual freedom but with responsibility to the group.