Path to Nation’s Prosperity: Democracy or Totalitarianism Democracy and Totalitarianism are two types of government that they are significantly different from each other. Democracy is a political system where the people are the source of sovereignty and power. Totalitarianism is a form of government of single ruler how controls everything. Although, the two system are originated from a long time, but now democracy has been seen as the most prosperous system for the modern ear, surpassing on totalitarianism in many aspects like: in an economy, freedom, human rights, efficiency of decisions...etc. Always, and on a large scale, the prosperity of the nations related to the freedom of their people.
If the regime of a state is widely accepted by the citizens with it, the state will, for the most part, be more successful and hold greater legitimacy. Different types of governments however, may affect the power of each regime. A democratic government for example will allow its people to have a much larger say in
Problems are solved faster because they only need to go through one person who is the king. The law making process is simpler since the king makes the laws. The state has a strong Amy which is a benefit to the state because it will have good defence. The disadvantages absolutism is that it leads to inequality of wealth. Where there is an irresponsible leader it is quite hard for people around to force this leader out or replace him with a more effective leader.
Conclusively, this country has changed drastically since 1776, and Thomas Jefferson would be very critical of how its democracy has changed. However, not everything has changed for the worse, many things have improved such as technological advances. But in terms of democracy, this country has taken a dark turn. People are monitored out of their own will, lied to over media, and given a president with no control. Thomas Jefferson’s version of Democracy would definitely contradict todays, but without change in the world nothing interesting would ever happen.
Absolutism was a period of prosperity during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Absolutism is a form of government, a monarchy, in which a monarch has full governmental control. This is different from that of a limited monarch whose power is kept in check by a constitution or other government officials. Absolute monarchs gain their power in one of two ways: being born into a royal family and being in line for the throne or seizing control. Absolutism meant prosperity because monarchs were considered gods (or God 's power on earth), they changed countries for the better, and could be liked by the people for not doing everything in a harsh way.
As previously stated, in the past a system of direct democracy was considered the ideal, with every citizen directly choosing what would we done. Furthermore, as Jean-Jacques stated: “the moment a people gives itself representatives, it is no longer free.” If we are to agree that this, a purely direct democracy, would create the best result, then one would conclude that any system with voting is a failure. However, this fully direct democracy would not seem to be feasible in the modern day. It would be difficult to organize all the citizens to take a full vote, especially when considering that this ‘ideal’ democracy did not include all citizens. It merely included landowning males, while excluding women and any
e.g. “The people are considered equal; laws are made when necessary to protect people from discrimination.” -diffen.com- That proves it! Socialism is better than capitalism, because everyone is considered equal, and laws are made to keep people FROM discrimination, unlike some of america's laws, the
But with all societies, there is something that always seems to be universal… societal structures. Some run off of monarchs others focus more on a dictatorship and then there is what the United States stands for, a democracy. Though it might seem like these societal standards are based on a consensus but they in the long run actually are not. These social structures are built off of control, manipulation, and deception. As a result, they are the reason as to how what and why people view when it comes to mass media or propaganda heard.
Even if the popular vote brings the majority closer to it, there is a more effective way of voting for candidates than the Electoral College, while making as many voices heard. The founding fathers built an excellent system for their times, but it has been centuries and their principles are outdated. People cry for a more fair way of electing a president, to get rid of the Electoral College. The TPAE is the most effective way of making it not to complex to vote nor is it hard to implement. The only wall that needs to be jumped are all of the states following through with this system, it could give us extra time to think of something
Firstly, this is because if the civil service is engaged in partisan politics, implementing policies of their parties would be much easier and more efficient. This is because everyone would want his party to remain in power and so would help in what so ever way they can to win the heart of the general public. Since the civil service is the administrative wing of the government, they contribute greatly in determining how long a party stays in power because even though the government make policies, draws budget and make decisions concerning the states, none of these can be fully realized without the civil service. Moreover, the government in making certain policies would need the advice, held and some ideas from the civil service because they