The first, and some would argue the only necessary, reason for the supremacy of Islamic government is the fact that it Islamic law is the comprehensive, divine law of God. The fundamental difference between the laws of liberal democracy and that of Islamic government is that the laws of democracy are simply laws made by men. It is folly to believe that laws made by imperfect men are superior to the divine ordinances of God . Khomeini believed that the path to happiness began in the implementation and following of God’s divine law . The fact that Islam is comprehensive means that God as already provided for every aspect of human life including government and society.
They protected the citizens of the city they had taken control of, in return for a reasonable tax. This demonstrated the honesty and character of the Muslims and the Islamic Empire who made sure they kept every promise and did not deceive or steal from their allies. These characteristics were major factors that contributed to the rapid growth of Islam. When the Muslim soldiery attacked Spain, a treaty between
Arguably, the rise of the Islamic fundamentalism in these countries represents a desire to anoint a more representative slate of political leaders, given that previously these groups have had little say in the governance given the dictatorial style of leadership. Therefore, this more representative form of governance, which emanates from an innate desire for a fairer system, is a step in the
In our modern day world, or more accurately, western culture, democracy is seen as the greatest type of regime. Democracy represents a plethora of attractive features that promotes individual freedoms and allows citizens to control the government that represents them domestically and on the world stage. Because of their belief that democracy is the best form of government, most western nations seek to use their foreign influence to promote democratic norms and institutions. The argument for the promotion of democracy comes from the Democratic Peace Theory, which states that democracies do not go to war against one another. However, some foreign policy analysts would disagree that the promotion of democracy brings international peace for multiple
The United States has an important type of government called democracy. “Democracy is the idea that is ruled by a government chosen by election where most of the populace are enfranchised. The key distinction between a democracy and the other forms of constitutional government is usually taken to be that the right to vote is not limited by a person’s wealth or race (the main qualification for enfranchisement is usually having reached a certain age) A democratic government is, therefore, one supported by a majority of the populace”. There are many other types of government with different systems that can function just as great or even much better. There is constitutional monarchy, technocracy, meritocracy but best of all is Geniocracy.
The great leader of India, Mahatma Gandhi said “I understand democracy as something that gives the weak the same chance as the strong” indeed majority of the country in the world are in favour of this ideology. If we think and see how our country has been in early 1950s and compare them with the present era we can make out the vast difference. It’s all due to the third king who had an idea of making our country familiar to the rest of the countries. He brought an idea to shift away from absolute monarchy to constitutional democracy. Democracy is the form of government where people choose their representative to rule the government.
Democracy is a form of government in which the supreme powers are vested in the people and is exercised by them indirectly or directly through a system of representation usually involving periodic fair elections (http://www.zesn.org.zw/publications/publication_280.pdf). Most importantly, the rule of is needed to ensure that governors are held accountable through elections that are free and fair (Rose, R 2009) Democracy really means nothing or less than the rule of people, expressing their Sovereign
d democracy and structured upon Islamic rules and laws (Ruhollah Khomeini ) Allah says in Quran(Yusuf verse 67) ‘ The leading pioneer of India s independence Gandhi had said that he wanted such a democratic state whose ruler followed in the foot steps of Hazrat Umar ‘ Islam is not only a religion Islam is a complete code of life .all aspects of Muslim society ,individually or collectively are covered by the social structure of Islam .our holy prophet (PBUH) established a state of at Medina of a unique type based on consultation justice equality and accountability .after his passing his righteous successors maintained the same system of governance .The holy Quran has mentioned the word SHURA for governance “ the govern with mutual consultation “ the essence of a true democracy is also consultation for religion is the source of all
The twentieth century witnessed the rise of elites and governments in the Islamic world, focused on modernizing and westernizing their respective states and social structures (Webb 2005, p.100). Mustapha Kemal in Turkey, Habibullah and Amanullah in Afghanistan, and Reza Shah in Iran are just a few examples hereof. In general, these leaders shared the common goal of discouraging traditional practices, which they generally viewed as archaic, and instead want to introduce modern institutions that would serve to integrate their countries and economies into the international community and the emerging global economy (Webb 2005, p.100). In Iran, these westernizing elements have constituted one side of a fierce conflict between modernism and traditionalism,
But since 1990s, there has been a decline in the effect of political parties. Also due to globalization, democracy is linked with various issues such as the importance of women’s and minority right. Moreover human rights are always a tangible force in international relations. Wahid Abd al-Majid’s 1992 doctoral dissertation from the Faculty of Economy and Political Science of Cairo University, Egyptian Parties from the Inside, studies internal democracy in Egypt and the division of authority amongst political parties, conflict over decision making , differences in ideological and