ipl-logo

Democrat Pros And Cons

1109 Words5 Pages

The Federalist Papers are some of the most important words that have been written in this history of the United States and were written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison who is responsible for Number 10. Madison focuses Number 10 on factions, their causes, and the result of their existence. Madison beings by stating the capability of the Constitution to control the outcome of factions, such as violence or damage and goes on to state the causes of factions and the solutions to their existence. Madison’s main focus in his paper is factions and their outcomes; a faction is simply a group of people with a common interest, either the “majority or minority of the whole.” Factions originate when people divide themselves over …show more content…

The effect of government delegation in a republic is that the views of the public are “refined and enlarged” to a certain extent by being passed through the citizens whom they elected to govern them. This causes the voice of the public to become more concerned with the public good rather than if the people were ruling themselves as is done in a democracy. However, this action can also backfire if people are elected who do not have the best interest of the people as their first priority and corrupt the system by “betraying the interests of the people” they are representing. There was debate over whether a small or large republic was more favorable for the well being of the people and the evidence is greatly in favor of a large …show more content…

A large republic government prevails over small republic or democracy when controlling factions because there are more people to divide into the factions and therefore there is less unification among the members of the factions. Also, if there is a large republic in which Senators are elected, it is easier to hold the leaders accountable for their actions due to the amount of people because the leaders need to stay on good terms in order to continue receiving votes. In contrast, a small republic allows the citizens to be easily manipulated by factions and leaders. A large republic protects the minority because factions will exist for as long as there is freedom. If there is a common interest or, passion, it will be felt by the all of the people who make up the majority. A “majority” faction is dangerous because it can become so strong that is overpowers the standing national government and results in upheaval and possibly wars such as the Civil War, which is primarily why the early United States should be concerned with

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of Having A Large Republic

    1042 Words  | 5 Pages

    Without a large republic not only are you going to have the tyranny of the majority, but you are not going to have a unified country. If we become factionalized to the point where every person represents their own views we are going to be headed towards civil war quickly, and we are going to break up as a nation. By having a large republic and by having all of these voices silenced in their factions we can stay coherent. Madison comes to the conclusion we are not going to have a large enough faction to tear the nation apart, but he is wrong because different opinions will always exist as long as people are free and self-love exist. These factions are inevitably going to tear the nation apart.

    Read More

  • Analyzing James Madison's 'Federalist Paper Number 10'

    208 Words  | 1 Pages

    There are also many other reasons a faction may exist, as long as there is a common idea among a group of people there will be a faction. He believes in order to limit factions you must do it in one of two ways; by removing the cause or controlling the effect. Madison explains the only way to remove the cause is to take away liberties or have everyone think the same way, both of which are more dangerous than the faction themselves. Because removing the cause won’t work the only

    Read More

  • 'The Federalist No. 10' By James Madison

    173 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the article “The Federalist No. 10” James Madison a faction is a group of citizens made up of people with the same interests and who don’t seem to care about the rights of other citizens. A lot of people weren’t agreeing when it was said that the United States would be too big to govern as a democracy causing there to be a large amount of factions. James Madison was aware there were a variety of factions, he showed that the democratic side using the majority rule would take down the factions resulting in making them come together to work as one, the republican side would allow the factions the necessary space for them to work together and get elected in the office. The minority groups would be protected because it would indicate the factions

    Read More

  • Federalism Dbq

    425 Words  | 2 Pages

    Around this era of the late 1700’s, the citizens of the newly independent nation of “America” were in the process of ratifying their government from the Articles of Confederation to the current Constitution which allowed for a democratic republic. The people in support of this ratification were the “Federalist” whom often used pamphlet writings known as the “Federalist Papers” to persuade and inform the public of their ideas and Constitution ratification. The most influential paper among the 85, is the Federalist paper #10 that disproves the Antifederalists’ argument that a republic of any kind would fall from the pressure of multiple divisive opinions among its citizens. Given the nature of humans by God, creating factions based on similar

    Read More

  • Federalist 10 Summary

    1223 Words  | 5 Pages

    Federalist 10 and the Danger of Majority Faction James Madison proclaims in Federalist 10 that a strong union must be ready to deal with the threat of factions. A faction, under Madison’s definition, is a group that shares an interest that contrasts from the interests of other individuals or groups. Citizens are inclined to voice their concerns and in society “measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority.” Madison believes the American form of popular government is certainly an improvement over the preceding attempts of “both ancient and modern” societies, but the system is still vulnerable to the threats presented

    Read More

  • James Madison's Arguments In Favor Of The Constitution

    688 Words  | 3 Pages

    James Madison starts this most popular of the Federalist papers by explaining that one of the toughest arguments in favor of the constitution is the principal that it establishes a government able to control the disturbance and damage made by factions. James Madison describes factions as groups of individuals in communities who gather around together in unity to promote and protect their special economic interests as well as political opinions. Even though these factions exhibit differences as well as distinguishing marks that separate them from each other, they constantly and continue work towards the public interest which gains support from inhabitants within those factions. And at times might infringe upon the social and communal rights

    Read More

  • 'The Impact Of The Federalist Factions'

    1745 Words  | 7 Pages

    This makes it extremely troublesome for one gathering to rule or debilitate the minority bunches. Equity is the reason pf government and common society. It government permits or urges solid gatherings to consolidate together against the powerless, freedom will be lost and rebellion will come about. Also the state of rebellion entices even solid people and gatherings to submit to any structure of government, regardless of how awful, which they trust will secure them as the frail.

    Read More

  • The Federalist No. 10 James Monroe

    163 Words  | 1 Pages

    As stated in The Federalist No. 10, James Madison explains the arguments occurring between those who possess property of land and those who are not. The unfair distribution of property brings a conflict between classes, explaining a common cause of factions. In fact, the antagonism between the “creditors” and “debtors”, defined by James Madison, was impacted strongly by their opinions. Additionally, their opinion on certain topics such as religion and the Government are naturally influenced by their diversity. Therefore, different perceptions based on their “different degree of activity” plummet high into the category of creating their own distinguished groups of what they favor known as factions.

    Read More

  • The Federalist No. 10 Argument

    978 Words  | 4 Pages

    He believes that a large republic would work out well for the States, because a larger government causes less negative impacts on the people, even though all of the people won’t be known, the government won’t be too centralized and only focused on the

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Republic And Democrats

    480 Words  | 2 Pages

    Republic vs. Democrat How strong of a role should government have in our lives? This question has been struggled my life as a teenager growing up. Major political parties plays a majoritarian role in the United States. The United States is a government run by the people and for the people. The United States is well-known for its two party political system where Republic compete with Democrats, trying to promote their political ideals and searching the means for maintaining their continuous political leadership.

    Read More

  • Constitution Guards Against Tyranny Research Paper

    525 Words  | 3 Pages

    The final way the constitution guards against tyranny is through big states vs. small states. Big states vs. small states compromise meant that in the House of Representatives, representation was determined by the population of each state whereas the senate representation was equal. In the house “representatives shall be appointed according to population,” and “the U.S. Senate shall be composed of two senators from each state” (Constitution of The United States, 1787). Big states vs. small states is the final way the constitution guards against

    Read More

  • The Role Of James Madison's Arguments In A Large Republic

    525 Words  | 3 Pages

    Why does Madison argue in favor of a large republic? Explain. In small republic there is less choices and less of a voice to be given for the people. With a better fit for characters to have a representation for the public’s voice.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Democratic Party

    225 Words  | 1 Pages

    Accordingly, the 2016 elections proved how increasingly irrelevant the Democratic Party finds itself in large swaths of the country. Likewise, more than a third of all House Democrats come from just three states: California, Massachusetts, and New York. This recently exacerbated problem was relayed by Congressman Ryan on an appearance of NBC’s “Meet the Press”. “It’s time to do something about it, not just talk about it,” he continued. “Because now we’re not even the national party.

    Read More

  • Madison's Views On Faction Summary

    501 Words  | 3 Pages

    1.) What does Madison mean by the term “Faction”? What is a modern term we would use today? Madison uses the term faction to refer to groups of individuals arguing not for the rights or good of the community as a whole, but rather that which would benefit those who hold similar positions or interests. Different factions represent different ideas, leading to conflict and debate.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast A Large Republic Vs Small Republic

    1337 Words  | 6 Pages

    Throughout our country’s history, there have been many debates about how our government should be run and set up. One of the biggest debates was whether or not a large republic was better or worse than a small republic and vice-versa. This argument occurred when the new constitution came into play and the debate circulated around the federalists and the antifederalists. The antifederalists wanted a republic where the citizens or the people being ruled were able to check and view closely the small republic with its small amount of enumerated powers. They saw this as the best way to keep liberty.

    Read More

More about Democrat Pros And Cons

Open Document