When people work together they tend to be more motivated and work harder because they know that if a certain goal is achieved it reflects all of them. The best positive impact of collective leadership is that different group members with different identities and experience can specialize on different fields to benefits the organization. The work is always discussed amongst the group members and if there is a contradiction among members about certain decision, they can vote and majority will rule. Having more than one leader ensures that the organization is much more stable and won’t fall in to pieces if one member is absent because the remaining members knows how to carry the tasks of the absent member, and have the ability to run the organization. Leaders try to give every client the attention they need as some people feel important when only dealing with the person in charge (Drath, 2009:300).
However, the leader is still the one that make the final decisions. Using this style does not prove that you are a poor leader,instead,it shows that you are holding a strength that makes your employees respect. It is normally used widespreadly when you have part of the information, and your employees have the other parts. Of course,a leader is not expected to know everything—this is why you employ knowledgeable and high-skilled people. Using this style is beneficial to both the leaders and the employees as it allows all employees to become part of the team and allows leaders to make better decisions.
Regarding changing world, complicated circumstances differ from one-another within one organization. The fact that, “a leadership style that is effective in one situation may prove completely ineffective in a different situation.” (Jago, 2007) To cope with this problem, to experience several cases during leadership trainings and to know how to adapt to the situation in order to observe side effects and resolve adverse consequences, help to take relevant decision. Moreover, in every respects, to find balance is crucial. As a manager, micromanaging reduces potential of a leader. “Micromanaging implies that leaders are unwilling to give up control and rely on associates to do their jobs.” (y Paul R. Bernthal, 2001) Consequently, this kind of leaders cannot see “ big picture” of situation and lose big opportunities while concentrated on trivial issues.
In other words, both the leaders and the organization lack a stable core – whereupon authenticity will be impossible. This argument is supported by a study conducted by Nyberg and Sveningsson (2014), who reported that leaders experience a tension between their authenticity and the expectations of other members in the organization. Due to that, the leaders reported to have restrained their authenticity in order to be perceived as good leaders. According to the authors, it is thus misleading to examine leadership disconnected from the context in which it takes
Employees come from varied backgrounds and have different work styles and habits. While these unique viewpoints create the most successful work, they can also generate resentment that quickly turns into conflict. When conflict arises in teamwork situations, employees are forced to resolve the conflicts themselves instead of turning to management. Learning conflict resolution firsthand is a skill that employees can use to become efficient managers down the road. e. Promotes a Wider Sense of Ownership Team projects encourage employees to feel proud of their contributions.
This style can be used efficiently if the leader has the access to the required information that other members of the group don’t have. Democratic leadership plays an important role in enhancing job performance and creating job satisfaction. In this type of leadership, employees participate in the process of decision making which will lead to creative solutions to address problems and to improve organizations performance. Team members are supportive under this type of leadership as everyone’s opinion is considered so there are no conflicts between the members. However, this type of leadership is time-consuming.
It provides an effective way for Virgin Atlantic to improve their performance that allows them to deliver the best result possible. Besides, the managers practice transformational leadership style. When human resources are used as a tool, the managers will assist their employees to adapt to changes. The managers emphasize on the independence of the employees. They give their employees autonomy to make their own decisions and gave them the mean to implement them; yet, they pay a great deal of attention to overhead and cost levels at the same time.
Also, it created a resource deficient in the organization since the overly allocated projects remain the priority of the individuals. Lastly, such culture also leads to the individual developing their own goals and tasks that misaligned with the overall organizational strategy and which failed to develop a proper work system, ensuring the involvement of the senior executive at the right time and also the depiction of the project progress on a wider lens to the management, leading to the development of more centralized and individualistic approach in the
This means they utilize different avenues to get things done. There are four important leadership styles that can be used: 1. Autocratic Leadership - An autocratic leader is one who has a complete control over the team. The team is not allowed to express their views even if it will benefit the organization. This type of leader does not allow criticism and questions.
The time-to-market of a project is probably the most important factor in measuring its success, a quick time-to-market suggests that its development went smoothly and it did not go over the budgeted cost for development. There are, however, a few drawbacks to project management in inner source that need to be mentioned. One such drawback is that this method of project management is entirely dependent on the collaboration of a group of developers. If the developers are not interested in the project or they don’t collaborate or add to the its development then the project will inevitably fail. Luckily, developers are usually highly motivated to work on inner source projects due to the openness and uniqueness of the projects.