I thoroughly enjoyed this film,and felt it may have been one of the best civil war films I have ever seen. One might even say Glory was glorious. The only part of the film I didn't like was the battle scenes. The battles felt very staged, you could tell there was very little emotion when it came down to the fighting and shooting. I felt the acting was superb though, Denzel Washington was amazing in all regards. You could feel his pride and rage in every scene he wanted you too. He totally deserved the Oscar for his portrayal of Trip in this piece.
I feel the only part where this film lacked was in the battle scenes. The staging and choreography are mediocre at best. The way people died was defiantly overly dramatic and they could have most
It was a very well written and interesting book in my opinion. I believe almost anyone would be able to sit down and read it even if they do not truly enjoy history. For someone who enjoys history, it would be extremely enjoyable to them. This book included many true events and people such as Robert E. Lee the real commander of the Confederate army. Also, the battles that were included as a part of this book were all true battles that had took place during the early 1860s.
To read the thoughts and the feelings of each major character as they suffered from defeat or rejoiced in a win was exceptional . All men felt the same when it came to the casualties. The book is by far a top rated novel on Civil War history and for good reason. Many historical books are written in more of a documentary format. Not this book however.
In this article, the intent was to show us the Civil War from a confederate’s perspective and I think it did a great job at that. Showing that the army officers interacted during the war even unearthing the Native American skeletons and gathering them up to see what their ancestors looked like. This article did not concentrate much on the war which I think was a good thing since a lot of people today usually view the confederates as bad people since they were fighting to keep slavery. There is one flaw that I found in this article.
The 1989 film Glory highlights the bravery displayed by the 54th Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry Regiment during the Civil War. It is a powerful and engaging film that holds the attention of the audience with action-packed scenes and emotionally-charged performances by the actors. It touches on historical events such as the Battle of Antietam and the storming of Fort Wagner. Glory chronicles the struggles faced by one of the first all African-American Infantry Regiments as they fought the Confederate enemy, while also fighting injustices in the army in which they served.
Overall, I thought this film was very informative and I learned a lot. It was very interesting. The film opened my eyes to a new world that I had never seen before. It informed me on history that I had no idea about.
Glory history or just a good story? The movie Glory was released in 1989, directed by Edward Zwick, and starred Matthew Broderick, Denzel Washington, and Morgan Freeman. The film follows the Civil War's first all-black volunteer regiment, the 54th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment, and their fight for equality and freedom in the face of racism and prejudice. The question that arises is whether the movie Glory is an accurate portrayal of the African-American experience during the Civil War or is it just a good story.
The Civil War was a big part of history having over 620,000 deaths. In this essay I am going to be talking of 3 of the battles of the civil war and the movie Glory along with 6 of the main characters and the 3 that impacted me the most. The civil war had 50 major battles but for this essay I'm going to be talking about 3 of them. In this case it'll be Gettysburg, Vicksburg, and Antietam.
Within our talk about the civil war there was a discussion on what black soldiers did in the war. How at first they just did the cleanup and so on for then war, but then they became soldiers for the union and some even became soldiers for the Confederate. The blacks that where soldiers for the Confederate was force to be solders by their masters. The movie “Glory” also brings together the movie we watch, by having important people in the movie that had a part in the war. For example, one of those people where Fredrick Douglas.
It was good as far as WW1 movies can be in my opinion. On the other hand, I am not generally captivated by war, and
The civil war is considered to be one of the darkest times in American history. More lives were lost in the war in total than in any other war the U.S has ever fought. Perhaps you say this is because the country fought itself, but the real question is, why did it? This was a country with ties of brotherhood that was built on freedom. But, it was a country that had never really solved its inherent problems that stemmed from its creation and was finally falling apart.
Becoming a Confederate victory, the others are forced to retreat. All the dead bodies are put into mass graves, including Robert Shaw 's. Despite this, by the end of the American Civil War, more than 180,000 African Americans were in uniform, and ready to fight in the war together hand in hand. This movie was a really powerful movie showing that there is no difference among blacks and whites, and that everyone is the same with a heart that functions, and the power to go to war and fight for their
It baffles me to see how these men, women, and children were treated as animals. I ask the question, how could these owner treat the slaves like this and not have any regrets or fears as to what would happen to them when they die. It also made me think on the slaves who were not born slaves that came from Africa who did know the language, customs, and how they were up rooted from their lives. I always thought that slaves were separated from their families because one of the family members did wrong. This film taught me that that was not always the reason some slave owners sold members of the slave families just because they could.
I enjoyed the movie better than the book. It included just the right amount of action scenes, description words, and details from the story. The story was amazing but I like seeing things more than reading them. I usually like the movies better than the book.
Glory: Directed by Edward Zwick, Columbia TriStar Motion Picture Group, 1989. 122 Minutes Reviewed by Mike Edward Zwick’s Glory is a movie in which the balance between entertainment and history was perfectly managed. He uses the letters sent by contemporary Col. Robert G. Shaw to his wealthy family back in Massachusetts as the historical foundation of the movie while imagining conversations between characters. Through Col. Shaw’s eye, we are able to uncover the birth, the development, and the end of the 54th Massachusetts Regiment, the first colored regiment fought in Civil War. Just like any other war movie, Glory has several battle scenes that were unpleasantly bloody, yet they managed to stay authentic.
Overall, minus a few hiccups, I greatly enjoyed this movie. The three aspects that most grabbed my attention becoming the sources of my enjoyment were character portrayal, the symbolism used in almost every scene, and connections to my own life experiences. I have always been a great supporter of the idea that characters are what makes a film great, for they are the basis of any narrative and prove to be one of the most