The film "Patterns" written by Rod Serling explores the different ethical perspectives of three main characters. Ramsey is a ruthless businessman, Briggs, the fair and just leader, and Staples is the ambitious and initially ethical employee. The central tenets of virtue ethics, as argued by Aristotle, say that virtues are character traits that allow individuals to live a good and fulfilling life. However, as the film progresses, we see a shift in the ethics of Staples as he becomes more entrenched in the cutthroat corporate world, moving away from Aristotle's virtue ethics and focusing more on his own personal gain at the expense of others. On the other hand, Briggs is guided by the principles of deontological ethics, which emphasizes the importance …show more content…
Briggs is shown to be someone who is guided by a strong sense of right and wrong, and is not swayed by the temptations or pressures of the company's ruthless leader, Walter Ramsey. He consistently refuses to compromise his principles, even when faced with the threat of losing his job or being replaced by the ambitious Fred Staples. In addition to these traits, deontological ethics also emphasizes the importance of moral autonomy, or the ability to make one's own moral choices. Briggs is shown to be a self-determined individual who is not swayed by the opinions or desires of others. He makes his own moral decisions, guided only by his own sense of what is right and wrong. At the conclusion of the movie, Staples undergoes a change in his moral compass. He starts to have second thoughts about Ramsey's cold-blooded and utilitarian approach, and he starts to see the value in adhering to a set of moral principles, which is similar to the deontological point of view. This change in his ethics is understandable given that it is a consequence of the natural progression of his character throughout the course of the movie. At the beginning of the film, we see that Staples is a relatively ethical person, who is hesitant to take advantage of others for his own gain. However, as he becomes more involved with Ramsey & Co., we see him begin to adopt the ruthless and manipulative tactics of his boss, Ramsey. This is demonstrated in several scenes, such as when he uses insider information to make a profit for himself, and when he actively works to sabotage the career of his colleague, William Briggs. As Staples becomes more entrenched in the cutthroat corporate world, we see a shift in his ethics away from Aristotle's virtue ethics. He becomes more focused on his own personal gain, at the expense of others. This is evident in the film's climax, when he ultimately betrays his long-time friend and mentor,
1. What Staples means when he refers to his brother’s death by saying, “The way the two were living, death could have come to either of them from anywhere,” is that the murder could have gone either way meaning his brother could have just as easily murdered his friend or an outside force, it was only a matter of time. Roanoke, Virginia was a city riddled with violence, crime, and thugs. Living in such a toxic environment, death would be imminent which was the case for Staples brother, Blake. It was unfortunate that the two friends could not settle an argument over a girlfriend and had to resort to murder.
He also talks about white men who wrote essays about black men and portrayed them as ruthless and criminals. Staples also talks about how he was mistaken for a burglar and another black reporter was mistaken
Staples writes, “I was to become thoroughly familiar
The worst experience Staples’ had was when he was running late
He was racially profiled and misconceived. Day after day he struggled with the judgmental and racists people of the world. He took it pretty rough for awhile but learned to secrete his rage towards the ignorant people. I feel Brent Staples wrote this to inform the world of these social and prejudice issues. Maybe to try and reduce the problem and bring it into attention.
Staples was a 23 years old at that time and a graduate student at the University of Chicago. He felt heavy inheritance with that situation; he also felt he was feeling as committed into autocracy. Staples states, “And I soon gathered that being perceived as dangerous is a hazard in itself” ( Brent Staples 1). He understood that she ran away because he could no way to prove that he was not from the ghetto.
Staples shows his style through arrangement in the very beginning of the essay. The first paragraph begins with calling his first encounter with a white woman as making her the “victim.” Even further on through the single paragraph, Staples continues to make himself out as the bad guy. After reading on, past the first paragraph, it is implied that Staples is portraying himself through the eyes of others.
Staples uses imagery, so the reader can picture it when reading his work, and to help create a sort of dark and lonely tone. The character uses several personal experiences which use a large amount of imagery. This is better shown when staples writes “ As a softy who is scarcely able to take a knife to a raw chicken- let alone hold it to a person’s throat……”(542), The character feels as though he is being judged for being a certain color when really he is afraid himself of getting hurt; he is also very humble and shy because he is afraid to even harm something that isn’t alive. When being treated as guilty and wrong, shame will follow; the character feels shameful that the lady is afraid of him when he has done nothing wrong.
By using such a unique story with eye-catching phrases as the introduction of his article, Staples evokes the emotion of fear and unsettledness that soon proceeds to a feeling of relief, yet in a way that 's melancholic.
Staples expresses his argument with real life experiences that have caused him to be stereotyped as a black male. People often think black males are “thugs”, “muggers”, or “rapist”, Staples points out that not all blacks fall under this category, especially him. Staples was first stereotyped when he was out walking at night (because this is what he likes to do) and comes across a white female who perceived him as a mugger or a rapist. This is when he realizes that he was “indistinguishable from the muggers who occasionally seeped into the area”( Pg.301 Para. 2). Staples comes to the conclusion that “being perceived as dangerous is a hazard itself” (Pg. 301 Para.)
I was surprised, embarrassed, and dismayed all at once,” he writes to admit that he’s harmless. Staples effectively persuades his readers to believe that not all black men are harmful. He wants to make more people comfortable around him and less of a negative stereotype. By acting the opposite of a thug that many [white] people make up the conclusion to be, Staples changes his behavior in a way to protect himself because he’s percieved as a thug that could potentially made him a target and a danger to those around him and to himself. Staples concludes in his essay that thugs wouldn’t be “whistling a bright, upbeat from Vivaldi’s Four
The women’s racism caused her reaction of “running in earnest,” “worried glances” and her eventual getaway, exemplifying the prejudice of a black male. He further demonstrates his “ability to alter public space” when just crossing “in front of a car stopped at a traffic light.” He hears the “thunk” of the driver locking their car regardless of them being “black, white, male, or female.” Staples understands the world is dangerous and people have the right to fear those around them, however, he continues to endure discrimination. But I am the person making those judgements.
That it is reality and not just a concept based off of racism. Within these anecdotes Staples uses hyperbole to create suspense and kind of overstate the real issue at hand in order to show how terrible his position truly is. Such as in the opening sentence, “My first victim was a woman - white, well dressed, probably in her early twenties…(542)”. The woman is not an actual “victim” to any physical harm. Nothing happened to her except she feared for possibly her life.
Staples claims that at the time, “there seemed to be a discreet, uninflammatory distance” between the two of them. Staples quickly became aware that she did not feel the same way; she repeatedly looked back at Staples with a worried glance. Staples suggests that in her opinion, the tall, black man walking behind her was too close for comfort. Staples claims that the woman picked up her pace and that “within seconds she
Staples utilizes the three main rhetorical devices, pathos, ethos, and logos all to give the reader an insight into the life of a black man in society. By using these rhetoric techniques, Staples can produce reactions from the reader and accomplish his goal of bringing the reader to his level and allow them to empathize with him. By being able to use these rhetorical techniques and pulling the reader into his piece, he can accomplish his overall goal of the piece and make the audience see that even though society claims against it, there is still racism today and that it is not obvious to us because it has become a part of our