Well, having body cameras as part of an officer’s uniform has its pros and cons. 1.The pros about body cameras are that it can prevent violence. A 2013 University of Cambridge study found that when police wear body cameras, both police and respondents are less likely to use violence. The study indicated a drop in use of force by more than a 50 percent. Body cameras could thus make the streets safer for both officers and the general public (Baum, E.,2015).
The topic for this research proposal project is on community policing, and the factors that are involved in determining if relationships between law enforcement and citizens in these neighborhoods are strained. In order to be successful, community policing must be built on trust, as both civilians and law enforcement must work hand in hand to protect their communities. If there is a lack of trust, then these programs becomes broken, and can therefore lead to other violence and criminal acts. This research proposal project will focus on minority based communities and citizens, where the majority of the citizens are either African American or Hispanic. The references used in this study will be used to build knowledge on the subject, and to identify
Improving the relationships of the minority communities and the NYPD is very important to strengthen New York City and combat crime. If minorities New Yorkers are able to believe the criminal justice system is here to “Protect and Serve” our communities than it is possible for everyone to work together. We must rebuild the relationship
The police jumped into action and treated this case with urgency. The type of injustice that this conflict displayed was distributive injustice. Distributive injustice “is concerned with the criteria that lead you to feel you received a fair outcome” (Deutsch, 2007, p. 44). I believe in most cases involving black people the news make the police out to be bad guys. The most recent cases with the killing of African American males will make you think that the police don’t care about Blacks.
In the same way, as reported by Dosomething.org, 80% of New York Police Department stops were blacks, 85% of those blacks were searched, but when whites were stopped 8% were searched! The criminal-justice system is supposed to be reliable and a fair system to maintain law and order in the country,but why aren’t they controlling this dangerous crime of racism and
In my research paper my topic is about the brutality of police tactics, and how they plan on improving these to make their attempts at arresting less forceful. “Are we becoming a police state?” This question is asked by many Americans today, Why? Because there are so many deaths by police that many feel like they are superior to laws, and often times the criminal offences they cause are overlooked. The fact that it’s only few cops that do this, they all get the bad reputation. This is backed up by: Paragraph 2 of Targeting U.S. citizens for killing.
Adopting a Durkheimian point of view, polices role will shift with less of an emphasis on the use of force, but a problem oriented method of policing (Griffiths 2015). This method entails the develop of new social working skills for the police, and an emphasis on taking power away from the state and putting it more in the hands of the community, in an attempt to empower proactive prevention, this is consequently achieved through trust between the community and police (Griffiths
NAACP 4805 Mt. Hope Drive Baltimore, MD 21215 Mr. Barack Obama President 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, Racial profiling has become a big issue in the U.S. I believe racial profiling is discriminatory. Racial profiling is defined by The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights as “targeting of particular individuals by law enforcement authorities based not on their behavior, but rather their personal characteristics.” Certain nationalities are targeted for a police have profiled Muslim, Arab, Hispanic, Black, and South Asian communities. The Bureau of Justice Statistics show variety of reasons.
In this article, Staples discusses the treatment of African Americans by U.S. police, emphasizing the history of racial profiling and discriminatory treatment. Staples focuses mainly on the arrest of Henry Louis Gates, Jr. who got arrested in his home located in Cambridge, Massachusetts which relvealed the sharp racial divide over what police could do to innocent black people. Robert goes on to explain that the racial underpinnings cause the majoritity of the public to favor law enforcement as a slutionto crime. Robert claims the political support for U.S. legal discrimination leads the people against minorities in criminal penalties over small crimes which usually are nonviolent offenses. I will use this academic article to support my conclusion
Racial or any profiling compiles behavioral characteristics associated with particular criminal actions, creating an original form of a yet unknown people who might be more likely than others to perpetrate the crime. The serial killer profiling was generated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which use crime scene evidence that implies the character of the perpetrator and helps narrow the scope of analysis. It was based on lengthy interviews with 33 convicted killers, an actual grounding like to the drug carrier sketch of Operation Pipeline (below). Racial profiling results when a complicated set of factors (which can include race) including a particular criminal profile are torn away in practice, transformed into an unjustified reduction: “Minorities are more prone to have drugs or commit additional crimes than are whites.” That stereotype inundates the ingredients of individualized facts needed for a possible cause. While it is the police who have displayed the burden of the blame, the practice also exists in the operations of asset and private division security.