The question that’s often posed by individuals who read Shakespeares Macbeth is why Macbeth stoops to the level of evil that he does. One could almost see superficially that Macbeth is just a pawn of fate, which could be solidly supported by the witches Macbeth encounters and even his wife. And fate and free will is defined so elegantly in Walter T. Stace’s Is Determinism Iconsisitent with free will? as follows; “Acts freely done are those whose immediate causes are psychological staes in the agent, Acts not freely done are those whose immediate causes are states of affairs external to the agent.”(Stace). However, in reality, Macbeth is not one subject to merely fate. Macbeth freely chooses however to let fateful factors influence him to …show more content…
Macbeth killing banquo is yet another example of Macbeth acting as an agent of free will. The decent to evil is in turn his fault alone. Macbeths killing of Banquo inheirently leads him down this destructive path and the guilt that fallows. This guilt that Macbeth feels after killing Banquo leads to the ghost being seen at the table. Macbeth in front of all the Scottish noblemen is the only one who sees the ghost of Banquo, “ Thous canst not say I dit: never shake? Thy gory locks at me” (3.4.45). These hallucinations that Macbeth experiences only prove as guilty to the thanes, for which they turn against him for this. All this will lead to the Thanes uprising and the eventual ruin of Macbeth. If viewed in this way, Macbeths free act of murder shows his free will. After Macbeth hears the second set of prophecchies from the witchs it once again shows his culpability of his own demise. The withches bring up apparitions that tell Macbeth, “beware Macduff/…None of women born shall harm Macbeth. /Macbeth shall never vanquis’d be until/Great Brinam Wood to high Dunsinane Hill/ Shall come against hime”(4.1.44-55).Macbeths acts on this by having Macduffs family servant killed. These murders although sparked by the witches prophecies lies purely on the hands of Macbeth. These acts are done freely and independently. Proving once again he is an agent of his own free will be commiting these hannous crimes and
Macbeth and Lady Macbeth in William Shakespeare’s Macbeth change their fate with their actions. In Emily Dickinson’s “Because I could not Stop for Death”, the narrator regrets her actions and wishes she could have changed her fate. On the other hand, Edith Wharton’s Ethan Frome, fate is said to be predetermined. By exercising free will, in trying to avoid their inevitable downfall, these three unconnected works of literature encompass the two types of fate, that which can change and that which is predetermined.
In "Macbeth" Macbeth is becoming more ruthless "he doesn't care about anybody else's future". His future has been set already he can't change it, he knows what's coming for him. His fate can't control his future. Also in "Macbeth" Macbeth is "honorable and brave" his
In Greek tragedies, fate uses the hero’s stubborn belief in his ability to determine his own fate in order to have him arrive at his fated end in a manner contrary to his will. Macbeth arrives at his fate by trying to be responsible for his own fate. On the one hand, Macbeth has no control over his destiny, and is merely a pawn of fate. On the other hand, fate actually does use Macbeth’s own character to accomplish its ends, so in that sense he is not merely a pawn. Because he is not merely a pawn, he retains a certain responsibility for his actions, and because he retains responsibility, he retains something of his freedom.
We all wonder how our lives will turn out in the end. For Macbeth, this doesn 't come easily. In the story Macbeth by William Shakespeare, Macbeth’s destiny comes by fate rather than free will due to his belief of invincibility, his actions and how he goes about dealing with things throughout the story. In Act IV, Scene i, Macbeth goes to the witches for prophecies.
Macbeth Free will is the idea that someone can make whatever decision they want to even though they have had outside influences. In the story, Macbeth, by William Shakespeare, many characters struggle to keep their free will because the have so many outside experiences and influences affecting their lives. In this story, the characters that keep their free will, and are influenced by the outside world are usually women. The men usually don 't keep their free will in this case. Characters like Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are good examples on how gender plays a role on people having free will or not.
It is an either or situation. Some people may think MAcbeth is controlled by fate, but quite a few people think Macbeth had complete free will. The reason people think that is because Macbeth “chose” to kill. The other reason people think Macbeth had free will is because he had the choice to deny Lady Macbeth and her wishes to have him do evil things. Another reason people may think Macbeth was controlled by free will is because he could have just stopped killing, he could have killed once and then moved on and stopped, but decided to kill more to solidate his power.
In many circumstances it can be hard to understand why something happened, especially whether it was fate or free will. If it was fate then what was going to happen was already decided, and if it was free will then whatever the character chooses will result in a different ending. In Macbeth, a Tragedy by William Shakespeare, Lord Macbeth receives multiple prophecies that end up coming true which leads many to believe that all of his actions are a result of fate, but along the way it is shown that Macbeth tends to make his own decisions showing that it could also be a result of free will. Even though Macbeth wasn’t able to escape his fate or prove that the witches prophecies were false, Macbeth's downfall was a result of free will, seeing that he made
Along with the witches' prophecies and belief in fate is a predetermined course of events, Lady Macbeth’s pressure and manipulation contribute tremendously to Macbeth's decision to kill the king. These events also create a significant impact on Macbeth's actions and decisions. These
Fate shows the characterization of disillusionment, and conveys the theme do not let fate decide a person’s future, take action and alter it to make it come true. After Macbeth comes back from fighting, witches appear and tell him his prophecy. “All hail, Macbeth! Hail to thee, Thane of Glamis / All hail, Macbeth! Hail to thee, Thane of Cawdor / All hail, Macbeth, that shalt be king hereafter” (1.3.51-53).
He does express remorse for Duncan in the beginning, but when he orders the killing of Banquo and Fleance he does so out of fear. This fear is converted into guilt when he sees Banquo’s ghost. Macbeth reflects on his actions, but instead of recognizing his sinfulness, his paranoia causes him to direct it towards Macduff and his family. Since Macduff is a threat to his throne Macbeth is adamant, almost rabid, with the thought of slaying Macduff.
In Shakespeare’s Macbeth the witches informs Macbeth of his fate that he will become the king in the future. Macbeth believes the witches words and Lady Macbeth persuade him to become the king and murder all the people that get in the way. Shakespeare shows us that fate is complicated by our actions, Macbeth will do anything to meet his fate that in the end lead him to his death because of his greediness.
The events that take place in Macbeth are both the choices he makes and the witches prophecies. Fate and free will is what causes Macbeth to fall in the end. In Act 1, Macbeth is content with his future being lead by “chance.” He says “If chance will have me king,why, chance may crown me, without my stir” (I.iii.143-144). Macbeth thinks by letting “chance” take over there is no reason to go against King Duncan.
Lady Macbeth influences Macbeth to kill Duncan, but he continues to have second thoughts about it (i.vii.31-34) and feels terribly guilty afterwards (II.ii.63-66). However, following the murder of Duncan, Macbeth loses any ethics he had left. Macbeth kills the servants, Banquo, and Macduff’s whole family in cold-blooded murder. On the other hand, when Banquo ponders the witches prophecy for him, he contemplates the thought of having to kill someone to get power, but he quickly shuts it down (III.i.9-11).
Free Will over Fate in Macbeth This theory is obvious in a scene, where Macbeth is consciously deciding to kill king Duncan. In Act 1, Scene 3 he states: - “My thought, whose murder yet is but fantastical, shakes so my single state of man that function, is smother’d in surmise, and nothing is, but what is not” (Macbeth 1.3.138-141). We observe his conscious unstable thought processes about contemplating and planning the murder of Duncan emerging shortly after hearing the prophecy, and before Lady Macbeth could hear the message and influence his decision.
In the play Macbeth, the lead role “Macbeth” was given a prophecy. Part of the prophecy stated that Macbeth would be king. Macbeth made decisions to make the prophecies come true, rather than believing that his actions were predetermined. Shakespeare, the author of Macbeth, probably believed that fate is never predetermined. I believe Macbeth’s actions were the cause of his own decisions, and that he did what he could to make his prophecies come true.