ipl-logo

Military Deterrence Policy Analysis

1812 Words8 Pages

As long as humans have been on the Earth, the art of deterrence has existed in some form or fashion. With the evolution of technology and change in society and culture, deterrence has taken on different forms. The basic idea of deterrence is deterring a person or group of people from committing an aggression on the threat of retaliation or consequences, many times in the form of threat of physical harm. Merriam-Webster defines deterrence as, “the maintenance of military power for the purpose of discouraging attack.”1 How a country maintains and arrays their military power is dependent on their capabilities. There are three aspects of military capability that are important in deterrence: time, size, and lethality. To have a proper military deterrence …show more content…

They were multi-faceted, consisting of conventional force projection, nuclear deterrence, alliance building and proxy wars. The deterrence policies of the US and the Soviet Union were also multi-tiered, aimed at preventing different levels of conflict. They both had nuclear deterrence policies, backed by very large, strategically deployed nuclear arsenals. The goal was to prevent the use of nuclear weapons through the notion of mutually assured destruction should one side use them. The lower tier of military deterrence deterred large scale conventional engagements. It was essential to have both tiers established as one of the points of deterrence is that the response should be appropriate to the offense. In this case, a nuclear response to an offense through conventional means would not be appropriate and would most likely escalate the conflict to a level that neither side wanted. The Cold War experienced both levels of …show more content…

Security alliances have proven to be a crucial part of a country’s deterrence policy. NATO is perhaps the strongest example of a security alliance that practices deterrence. During the cold war, the Warsaw Pact was the counterpart of NATO on the Soviet side. Both had the same function and were effective in deterring the other side from acting on aggression by creating strength in numbers. The US has created a large network of extended deterrence over the past decades, but there is beginning to be a shift in its policy. On many occasions, the US has been the lead proponent in alliances it forms. That has begun to shift in recent years. The new emerging US philosophy is that alliances are critical to the US extended deterrence policy, but they are willing and encouraging other countries to take the lead. A good example of this is revolution in Libya in 2011. While the US was part of the alliance involved in the operation, they were not the leader and played more of a support role.9 Patrick Morgan states “the United States wants the alliances to provide more military assistance to itself by becoming more suitable for joining American forces in conflicts and interventions around the world.”10 This has two clear benefits to those in alliance with the US. Morgan goes on to state those. “The payoff for

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast Reagan And Bush

    2097 Words  | 9 Pages

    It became evident that the position of strength was achieved through the commencement of negotiations to reduce arms. For example, in 1988, Reagan and Gorbachev implemented the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF Treaty) which banned all land-based missiles with ranges between 500-1000km from both nations. This was a significant step in the ending of the cold war as it reduced the nuclear arsenal which enabled a period of relative peace afterwards. This treaty highlights the clear shift in Reagan’s policies between his first and second term, as the SDI (although defensive) increased the military strength of the US but only a few years later Reagan implemented treaties aiming to reduce this

    Read More

  • Summary Of Guns At Last Light By Rick Atkinson

    1165 Words  | 5 Pages

    He supports this thesis by emphasizing the might of the American economy and focusing on the strength of the Allies’ alliance, and supports both arguments well. Atkinson also implies that

    Read More

  • Jacksonianism Pros And Cons

    961 Words  | 4 Pages

    By having a dominant military force, deters other nations from exercising militaristic expansion in fear of retaliation. This fear of retaliation kept international order to a status quo and prevented any possible conflict. The Cold War exemplifies this realist foreign policy as both nations, US and USSR, did not engage in direct conflict. Due to the lack of conflict allowed the preservation of peace. It was only through Jacksonian push for a strong military that allowed a relatively peaceful society.

    Read More

  • Nsc-68 Analysis

    370 Words  | 2 Pages

    In order to make the American people aware of the growing Soviet threat, the National Security Council create the NSC-68. This document contains information on defense and internal security to deal with the threat. In terms of defense, the NSC-68 “was the result of a review of American foreign and domestic defense policies.” The document outlines the conflict between the Soviet Union and the United States. It mentions four options for responding to the threat: 1) maintaining and continuing our current policies, 2) “returning to isolationism,” 3) deciding to go to war with the Soviet Union, 4) and “a rapid build-up of political, economic and military strength in the Free World.”

    Read More

  • Cold War Dbq Essay

    1222 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Cold War was a time when The United States not only secured it’s place as an influencer of international affairs, but explored its new standing as a rival to other world leaders. Immediately following World War 2, The USSR and America’s relationship began to dissolve as fundamental differences in basic beliefs for government and military organization became clear, and without a common enemy to unite the two, tension and conflict would separate the superpowers for almost 45 years. The policy of containment, The Truman Doctrine, and NSC-68 would each play a pivotal role in the Unites States stretching its hand of democracy into foreign lands, and using military force against the regimes that began to stand in freedom’s way. Beginning in 1946, the Policy of Containment was proposed by George Kennan in a document now titled, The Long Telegram. He presented his hopes that the United States would attempt to keep communism and regimes within their current borders.

    Read More

  • Foreign Policy Dbq

    715 Words  | 3 Pages

    Defense, known as resisting attack, combined with foreign, a country other than its own country, equals out to be the defense for your own country for its good against opposing foreign countries. During the time period of 1789 through 1825, the United States extended foreign policy as a method of defense and protection from perceived or actual threats of the almighty Europe. During the late 1700’s while Washington was President, he ordered for a foreign policy of Neutrality; neutrality meaning maintaining unharmful relations with both France and Britain. As the idea of protection and defense of America was continued to be kept in mind by our federal government, by the early 1800’s the Monroe Doctrine was eventually formed to avoid any interferences by Europe and their contagious conflicts, preventing our land to ever

    Read More

  • Us Policy Of Containment Dbq Essay

    657 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stopping the spread of Communism through military and nonmilitary ways. The Soviets had expansive tendencies. The Soviets wanted to isolate West Berlin from the West and take them over. From Document A, In these circumstances it is clear that the main element of any United States policy

    Read More

  • What Will America Be Remembered For Essay

    563 Words  | 3 Pages

    As Disrupters The strength of future militaries will be compared to our own; the expansive reach of the US military is the largest on Earth. From conflicts in South America to the Middle East and Asia, the US has always thrived during wartime, gaining much of its power from the aftermath of World War II. By much of the world today our country is seen as democratic invaders; bringing a message of democracy and freedom while still firmly holding our weapons. In this way, our country has shaped the world drastically; influencing both the progress of technology and the equivalent sizes of foreign militaries.

    Read More

  • How Did The United States Change Its Foreign Policy From 1918-1953?

    606 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Why and in what ways did the United States change its foreign policy from 1918-1953?” Since World War I, the united states had always had a problem with forcing its foreign policy. Throughout the past 100 years, the foreign policy has changed depending on public opinion and what was going on in other parts of the world. One of the largest changes in the foreign policy occurred from the end of World War I (1918) up until the ending of the Korean War (1953). Essentially the U.S foreign policy evolved from isolationist “prevention of war” to interventionism “protective containment of communism”.

    Read More

  • Nuclear Deterrence Between The United States And The Union Of Soviet Socialist Republics

    262 Words  | 2 Pages

    The art of fear is essential in nuclear deterrence. Using the film Dr. Strangelove (Stanley Kubrick, 1964) I will argue that nuclear deterrence is hard to achieve when communication of nuclear capabilities is not well established amongst states. In this paper, I will use the film Dr. Strangelove (1964) to argue how theories such as deterrence theory, realist theory, security dilemma, preventative war, pre-emptive war as well as relative gains and zero sum game led to a failure to achieve nuclear deterrence between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. To make my argument on how more nuclear weapons may hinder deterrence, this essay will proceed as follows; I will firstly discuss the how nuclear deterrence and mutually

    Read More

  • Essay On The Cold War Consensus

    798 Words  | 4 Pages

    Foreign Policy would be focused on the Soviet Union and the containment of communism. The United States during the early years of the consensus mainly responded to the actions of the Soviet Union. During the later part of the consensus the United States was in a better position respond to the Soviets. The United States had enhanced their military capability within long range nuclear bombs and conventional arms build up in Western Europe (79). During the face off over the future of Berlin, the Americans showed it was not backing down from the Soviets.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Kennedy's Ways Of Dealing With The Cold War

    533 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Presidents of the Cold War What were Truman, Eisenhower, and Kennedy's ways of dealing with the Cold War? Both Truman and Eisenhower used the policy of containment when dealing with the Cold War. Kennedy used flexible response in the war instead of containment. Containment is to keep things under control (Ayers 819).

    Read More

  • Who Was Responsible For The Cold War Essay

    496 Words  | 2 Pages

    "The Cold War was an ideological contest between the western democracies especially the United States and the Communist countries that emerged after the Second World War" (Tindall 972). The United States and the Soviet Union had differences over issues such as human rights, individual liberties, economic freedom, and religious belief. "Mutal suspicion and a race to gain influence and control over the so called nonaligned or third world countries further polarized" (Tindall 945). After the WWII Soviets dominate European countries and thought the U.S. had the same motives.

    Read More

  • Nuclear Weapons Risk Assessment

    1023 Words  | 5 Pages

    In this regard, countries such as Pakistan that are perceived to have limited security in relation to their stockpiles of nuclear weapons and weapon grade materials pose a significant threat. During the administration of President Pervez Musharraf, there were at least two assassination attempts that were conducted through the collusion of the military and Al Qaeda operatives. This raises the question if the Pakistan administration is unable to secure the security of its president, what about the stockpiles of weapon-grade nuclear material in their possession. Moreover, Iran has been known to finance and support terror organizations, which also raises questions whether it could provide nuclear technology to such groups to hit American targets on its behalf. Additionally, nuclear weapons could be smuggled into the United States from its neighbors such as Canada and Mexico, who seem to have a mediocre security system.

    Read More

  • Case Study: Can NATO Impose Penalties

    1547 Words  | 7 Pages

    Paul N. Langdji Professor Soukupova Kristina PhD IRS – 671 NATO in the 20th and 21st Century 13 December 2017 Can NATO Impose Penalties or Sanctions member Countries not meeting 2% GDP Financial Requirement? Although NATO from its creation was primary concerned with the security of few countries who wanted to deter soviet expansionism during the cold war, prevent German and other European nationalist militarization and maintain a strong US presence in Europe as Lord Ismay the first NATO commander indicated ; Currently made of 29 member countries as of 2017, NATO has evolved to become the biggest military alliance in the word. It is quite importance to mention that it still remains a defensive alliance although the primary objectives when for its

    Read More

More about Military Deterrence Policy Analysis

Open Document