Did George Washington's Obligation To Lead The Nation

1395 Words6 Pages
During the mid-eighteenth century, following the American Revolution, the newly founded United States was in a precarious state. Many problems throughout the country aroused, based on the fact that there was no head to lead the nation. It was when the great George Washington stepped forth and led the country as the president of the nation. In memory of his heroic and substantial leadership, a capital city and state, as well as a dollar bill and quarter, were made after him. These dignified praises he so rightfully deserved, for he assumed his responsibility to lead the nation despite his longings for retirement, contributed to the structure of the national government, and favorably led the nation during his presidency. Throughout his entire life, George Washington had always undertook his obligation to lead the United States, in spite of his desire for political seclusion. Following the establishment of American independence post-Revolution, he publicly retired from Congress to Mount Vernon. During the time forth, the function of the Articles of Confederation, then the founding document that transcribed the role of the national government, began to falter, as it did not properly enforce the power of Congress. Shay’s Rebellion and other nationwide economic complications forced Congress to plan the Philadelphia Convention of 1787, a political gathering for the…show more content…
[a complete] separation from the political world…. [Four years later, nearing its approach,] Washington suffered even more anguish… to attend the Philadelphia Convention.... He wrote to friends imploring them to tell him ‘confidentially what the public expectation is on this head, that is, whether I will or ought to be there?’.... What finally convinced Washington… was the fear that people might think he wanted the federal government to fail so that he could manage a military
Open Document