Chng_Sze_Han 4I
Hitler's Government - A politician's Dream or Nightmare?
Did Hitler’s government help or hinder the rise of Nazi politicians? The politicians that will be analysed are Hermann Goering, Joseph Goebbels and Reinhard Heydrich. This is namely because these were prominent politicians who were close to Hitler. To define terms, the government “having an impact” on these politicians’ rise to power would mean directly or indirectly pushing either the politicians higher up the political ladder or pushing down competition for these places in the top of the government. For example, the government would stop the promotion of politicians who did not have certain traits that instead these politicians had, that would be having an effect. The
…show more content…
Many historians look at this issue with hindsight, comparing Hitler’s government to the model of one today. Instead, Hitler’s government should be analysed while keeping in mind that Germany was a totalitarian state. Since the country believes in a one ruler system, the government is very likely to be structured similarly as well. This in turn raises the question, through the system Hitler implemented, how were politicians able to prove themselves worthy of power to Hitler? Did this structure of the government truly hinder the rise of these politicians? Did it help these politicians? Or did it even matter at …show more content…
Joseph Goebbels committed suicide months before the indictment for the charges against the Nazis, Reinhard Heydrich had been assassinated in 1942, 3 years before the trials began. Among the three politicians, only Hermann Goering was charged and even then, he committed suicide before his death sentence. These politicians had it coming for them; they already knew that in trying to please Hitler, they had gone too far. With no chance of surviving, they committed suicide or in the case of Heydrich, was assassinated
On November 14, 1945, the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials began in Germany. They were to be the definitive judgement of the crimes against humanity by the Nazis. In the midst of the trial, it was determined that the SS, along with its associated organizations such as the Sicherheitsdienst (SD--the security and intelligence organization within the SS) and Geheime Staatspolizei (Gestapo—State Secret Police), was a criminal organization.1 The verdict placed on the SS was as follows:
Keegan offers a fresh and perspective on Hitler's strengths and deficiencies as a military leader. The figure that emerges from this analysis is more soldier and front-fighter than politician. Hitler politics was war, at least the preparation for war, and his unswerving goal was to realize the victory that seemed near in 1918. While stubbornness epitomized his larger strategy, meddling with details increasingly substituted for professional tactics. This, Keegan argues, was superficial generalship, haphazard, amateurish.
The major cause of Hitler’s political success was due to the tremendous amount of fear that people associated with him. The fear of Hitler is what forced the government to grant him the enabling act, which then lead to the rise of Natsism. President Paul Von Hindenburg thought of Hitler as a threat to their power, so as a tactic to suppress his authority, they thought by electing him into office and appointing him chancellor was enough for him to feel some sort of power and settle down. It gave Hitler a voice in the government and a say what goes on in decision making,so they assumed this would satisfied Hitler and keep him contained. They were wrong.
Adolf Hitler rose to power as chancellor of Germany in 1933 and eventually its leader in 1934 with the intension of establishing a state adhering to totalitarian ideas (“Germany: Establishment of the Nazi Dictatorship”). Book burnings were the precedent for “Hitler's attempts to control the minds of the German people” (Zebrowski). This quality is, in fact, a key attribute of a totalitarian state. To accomplish the formation of totalitarianism, “Germans were fed Nazi ideology” while various forms of media or means of communication to the masses were heavily censored ("Impact of Nazi Rule"). As a result, the government under the Nazi Party employed radio broadcasts and newspapers as means of dictating the opinions of the German society (“Book Burning”).
This shows that although government impact was relatively positive they did have negative impacts
The causes of Hitler and the Nazi Party gaining power in Germany in 1934 were a large combination of factors. The first was losing world war one which created serious social, political, and economic effects on the Nation with the addition of the treaty of Versailles, the Wall Street crash and the Great Depression of 1929. Secondly, the newly elected socialist democratic government saw unable to provide solutions to all the crises - leading to the fall out of the Weimar Republic. The third factors were that Hitler would be secretly backed by powerful interests with the overuse of Article 48 and the supply of money from successful businessmen as he seemed to be the only politician able to provide the answers to the problems and his public speaking skills would
threats. The Enabling Act gave Hitler absolute power over the government and Germany as a whole (Pappas). Hitler also rose to absolute power as the puppeteer to the President Paul von Hindenburg. Hindenburg was very, very old, and incapable. With these circumstances, Hitler acted as President, as well as Chancellor, up until Hindenburg died in 1934, which is when Hitler was changed to Führer.
Major Events Between 1933 and 1939 that Affected the Holocaust Enabling Act of 1933 One of the final nails in the coffin of Jewish Germans was the Enabling Act. The Enabling Act or more formally known as the “Law to Remedy the Distress of People and Reich” (“The Enabling Act”, par. 1). was a law passed by the Nazi Party enabling Hitler to have all power of the government in his authority. With all power in Hitler's hands and absolutely no one that could stop him with contradictory political power and influence he could do almost everything as he wanted and forward his plans of genocide and hate onto the Jewish people.
Essay Proposal Abstract This research question is regarding Hitler’s charisma, whether it was real personal charisma, or whether his character was constructed by propaganda or the work of others and perceived by the people as his own charisma. Aims & Purpose This question aims to find out how Hitler’s rise to power came to be.
The leaders during the interwar years used secret organizations for the use of eliminating all political threats. In Germany, the Nazi government effectively blamed crimes on their political threats in order to denounce the others and make their government look stronger. For example, Nazi chief of police Hermann Goering blamed the burning of the Reichstag on a communist Marianus Van der Lubbe. “This is a communist crime against the new government,” said Goering. Apparently, Van der Lubbe was in the Reichstag and Goering ordered an SA officer to set it aflame.
Adolf Hitler came to power in 1933 with the promise of nation building and making Germany a super power and reclaiming what was lost in the war of 1918. Hitler’s Lieutenant, Joseph Goebbels, called for a revolution from below to make the German nation “into a single people”. This led to the racial purification of the German population during the Second World War. The cultural dimensions were added to the national identity to convince people that their culture was superior. The idea
The Third Reich, referring to Hitler’s reign and Germany being under Nazi rule between the years 1933-1945, is often referred to as a totalitarian state. A totalitarian state is a system of government in which all power is centralized and does not allow any rival authorities, and the state controls every corner of individual lives with absolute power. Nazi Germany has been referred to as an excellent example of this type of government. This essay will analyse five aspects of Nazi Germany to determine whether it truly exhibited the totalitarian style of government.
Hitler feared the deterioration of his popularity by making un-popular decisions”, this led to him allowing other “high-ranking officials” would often influence political
Propaganda, terror and repression played a significant role in the Nazi regime. Hitler used each to supplement and complement each other with the main focus to make Hitler appear a strong, powerful and all-knowing man who was in favour of the Nazi vision of the ‘national community’. This all impacted the German people by preserving support for Nazism and ensuring that the community that didn 't agree with the Nazi regime would not be heard by any
Evaluate the role of the economy and propaganda in Hitler's maintenance of power Seungchan Yang After Hitler took a power in Germany, he managed to consolidate his power using his economy policy, gathered destitute Germans together, but also using the propaganda, increasing the support towards him. This increasing mass of supports towards him due to his policy that had increased the employment in a tremendous amount and the use of propaganda that had spread his belief and convinced Germans. However, despite these successful economic policy, the fund raised was purely concentrated on rearmament and still the autarky was not achieved, and his economy policy was just for the violation of Treaty of Versailles. Still, Hitler’s decisions in