During discussions, teachers are often interested to hear students arguing about their own standpoints rather than the actual takeaways from the paper. Structure like this in classrooms only validates that students are able to argue but, diminishes the opportunities of creating values to the scholarly work and voicing out from the side that share the same opinion as the author. This leads to academic rewards for these arguing students as suggested by Deborah Tannen, leaving the rest to believe that they are not good enough for the academia. Based on personal experience, I would like to add that such agonism demotivates students to explore knowledge outside of their field and creates an impression that they are never meant to explore topics that they are least expert at. This structure has to be reshaped to bring back the original goals of criticizing work so that there is a value for everyone in the
Luckily, Mike Rose the author of I Just Wanna Be Average found someone that wants him to start learning someone that make him change his mind. Accordingly, to Mike Rose the methods professors use in teaching it affects the way students learn. He tells us this when he said “When his class drifted away from him, which was often, his voice would rise in paranoid accusations, and occasionally he would lose control and shake or smack us” (Rose 346). What Mike Rose is saying in this
The author author of “Study by Katherine Schulten” also agrees that the culture is an important part of the context but if not taught right would get a cold reaction. Agreeing author explains, “They said they would no longer do the work”(Schulten). The colored students stop doing work because of the reactions they were given when the word was read in class. The author also describes, “for their part, felt to self-conscience”(Schulten). This shows that if the word is not properly “prepared for” it may put colored individual in an uncomfortable situation.
And they probably came to Pencey that way” (2). In this paragraph, the audience hears Holden’s negative immutable perspective about his school Pencey as he seems to not like the school at all, much less the people in it. The author uses words like “splendid” and “clear-thinking” to really express holden’s strong opinion about the guys at Pencey and how they don’t meet the expectations that the school holds. In the beginning of the book the reader is introduced to Mr. Spencer who is one of Holden’s teacher’s. Mr. Spencer comes out as a nice teacher whose only intention is to help Holden and guide him through the misfit of society as he realizes that Holden needs a hand to hold.
Lines 32-40 have a rhyme to those lines. The effect of these end lines that rhyme together cold be that the speaker is perhaps letting his instructor know that although they might be different, and both might have the mutual mindset of not wanting to be a part of each other; here they are. While they are here, they should make the best of it and learn from each other. The poem ends with "This is my page for English B". This shows that the speaker has completed his assignment.
The essay, On Laziness, by Christopher Morley, portrays his argument of why laziness is often the key to being successful. In his opening sentence, he starts by explaining how he intended to write an essay but was simply too lazy to do do. The purpose is already being expressed through his use of satire. This helps the audience apprehend how he’s portraying his meaning through his own writing style, which includes theoretical irony, satire, and use of persuasion. The use of actual laziness used to write this essay made the readers ponder and question what he was trying to say.
In Frank L. Choffi’s Argumentation in a Culture of Discord, he explains that the media’s poor portrayal of arguments and debates create a misunderstanding of what most students view as writing argumentatively in an analytical essay. Also, the common five paragraph essay further misguides students that are attempting to organize their argumentative college paper in a structured style after the five paragraph paper. Choffi proves that the media illustrates arguments as simply a passionate discord that forces one to chose a single side of the argument and only agree with that side. Inaccurate and elementary, the media 's overly simplified formula of arguing leads to a false sense of instant gratification in writing a paper. Although Choffi’s
While transitioning between his two tones in his reading, the author steps out of the main story to address the reader more directly in order to appeal to authority. He explains in a more detailed fashion why the students end up behaving so uninterestingly towards anything academic. This appeal is also logical in the sense of following the mind process of a student in a remedial class; from wanting to learn something new, to telling him or herself “Why bother?” and giving up on school. Rose presents his argument using all of the three classical appeals. He uses his emotional appeals well, and could be considered unbiased, based on his discussing both sides of the spectrum with respect to teaching.
At the beginning of the poem, “You do not have to be good” is used to not only speak to the narrator but set the course for which readers will follow. “You do not have to walk on your knees… repenting.” is another example of the mesmerizing words Oliver uses to aid in the reader’s emotional connection to the narrator. The poem begins with these lines to represent how a person dealing with limitations may feel and respond to these. Still, these thoughts are quickly disregarded by the narrator and readers become informed that such feelings of self-blame are petty and unnecessary. The accountability that a person may feel as a result of limitations becoming deciding factors for the future are not valid reasons to have self-blame.
In Baldwin’s essay he shows a complex perspective. In the beginning he is optimistic but as it continues he turns more and more pessimistic. He realizes everything isn’t as good as he thought it was and becomes angry and bitter. While the tone remains straightforward and calm, the mood is slightly angry. Baldwin doesn’t want pity either, but he does want the reader to understand the trials and tribulations he had to go through because of racism.