Some believe that the Nuremberg Trials brought justice to the victims of the war. The trials did acknowledge the Holocaust, but they were never able to bring righteousness to the victims (Rubenstein). The Boston Globe said in 2015, "It is true that the International Military Tribunal, the first and most widely remembered trial at Nuremberg, focused on the crime of aggression and was not specifically intended to cover the mass murder of the Jews, what we have come to call the Holocaust" (Rubenstein). The main point of the first trial was to bring justness to the Holocaust victims and survivors. The trial acknowledged the events of the Holocaust and condemned 14 defendants to death (Keleher 1139). Despite all of this, justice will never …show more content…
Nikitchenko was one of the Soviet Union 's judges. He had presided over several infamous show trials used by Joseph Stalin to convict his so-called enemies during the Great Purge of 1936 to 1937 (Davenport 59). During these show trials, Stalin would send innocent people to work camps or have them killed (Davenport 59). This does not reflect very well on Nikitchenko 's role and mission in the Nuremberg trials. Nikitchenko 's action to oversee such crimes was very wrong. Now, in 1945 he was serving as a judge to condemn German Nazis for their wrongdoings even though he had witnessed and approved of the killing and torture of innocent citizens. This just contradicts the Nuremberg trial 's mission. The Nuremberg trials were meant to punish Germans and all those who had committed reprehensible acts during the war, but the Allies were not convicted for their crimes (Davenport 141). Because those charges against the Nazis were made following the crimes, it is suspicious that none of the crimes committed by the Allied powers were brought forward. Both sides bombed massive amounts of innocent civilians. A famous instance is when the Allied
On November 14, 1945, the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials began in Germany. They were to be the definitive judgement of the crimes against humanity by the Nazis. In the midst of the trial, it was determined that the SS, along with its associated organizations such as the Sicherheitsdienst (SD--the security and intelligence organization within the SS) and Geheime Staatspolizei (Gestapo—State Secret Police), was a criminal organization.1 The verdict placed on the SS was as follows:
The Investigation is a dramatic documentary of the Frankfurt War Crimes trials during the 1960s based on actual evidence from the trial. Weiss strips the trial down to its most essential features and converts it into a powerful play. It consists of extracted testimonies from numerous witnesses and defendants, including moments of examinations and cross-examinations conducted by the prosecutors and defense counsel. The nine unnamed witnesses represent the millions of individuals affected by the Holocaust. They were brought forth to testify to the barbarity of Auschwitz.
The trial covered the three main factors of denying the Holocaust. The biggest accusations claim was that there was no proof of the Nazi’s having an organized plan to eliminate Jews, that there was no proof that Hitler ordered the extermination or did not know of the extermination of Jews, and that no Jews were killed with the use of gas chambers. He believed specifically that no Jew was ever murdered by gassing at the Auschwitz extermination camp. The trial began in January of 2000 and ended, with a judgment strongly in favor of Lipstadt and her publisher, in April of that year. The purpose of the trial was for Irving to gain his credibility back.
According to the document 25-3, “The Holocaust: A Journalist Reports on Nazi Massacres of Jews, the massacre of the Jews,” the Holocaust, affected not only Jews, but it also affected the United States. The writer of the Journalist reports, Varian Fry, offers possible responses to the Holocaust by the United States and its allies. However, most citizens in Allied countries did not believe the Holocaust, and their governments were optimistic about solving this problem. As a journalist who saw what is really happening in the Germany, he criticizes how reluctant the Allies are. The document suggests not only the United States needed to recognize the fact that Jews were suffering from the Nazis, but it also shows that the entire world needed to accept that there was a such massacre.
The holocaust was not just about the slaughtering of jews is about riding the world of its imperfections. According to Hitler these “imperfections” included being jewish, having anything but blonde hair and blue eyes, being handicapped mentally or physically, or being homosexual. During the holocaust jews human natural rights were violated in several different ways. There is a document that states all of the human rights. You would think that people are able to use their common sense to be able to determine that
Lastly, the Nuremberg trials was one of the biggest events to occur toward Albert Speer. It is because of his work with the Nazi Party and his contribution to the outcome of war, was he being held accountable for his actions. However, through devious remarks and claims that he was unaware of such actions being taken place under his authority, he was sentenced to a lighter penalty than what his fellow collages. Speer was held accountable for four crimes; including the common plan or conspiracy to accomplish… a war aggression, crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity. However, out of the four crimes, ‘war crimes’ and ‘crimes against humanity’ were the two that would have been the biggest concern for Speer.
The Salem Witch Trials and The Holocaust are two past events that are commonly known and remembered today for the prosecution of many innocent deaths. These two took place in different areas as well as different time periods but are still comparable in numerous ways with the death tolls, the people who took leadership, and the way it affects history today for example. The Holocaust is known for the five to six million jews that were burned, shot, hung, or even experimented on (www.history.com). Several different individuals were punished for unique characteristics (Wiesel,).
Many of the accused got sentenced to life in prison or death. Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment to explain the correlation of the environmental aspects that make people do terrible things and how far people will go to harm others. Social pressures also play a big role in how people think. Minorities can have their ideas of what is right and what is wrong swept over by majorities which was displayed in Solomon Asch’s experiments. The most important thing to learn from the Nuremburg trials, Milgram’s experiment, and Asch’s experiment is that sometimes it is better to resist authority if it means following moral
Millions of people through history have been treated unfairly. During WWII, the Holocaust was one of the greatest atrocities of all time. People were also wrongly accused and punished during the witch trials in Salem that occurred during the 1600s. these two events have differences but they also have similarities as well.
Since the Holocaust, the United Nations have made sure to let everyone throughout the world have equal rights. This mass killing of Jews violated every right that they had. They were beaten to death, shot on spot, starved, poorly clothed, et cetera. No one deserves the harsh treatment that they got throughout World War II. Nearly six million Jews died during this regime of a Nazi leader named Hitler.
Memory and history have always shared a part in creating an individuals perception of themselves, their lives, and of their importance. The Holocaust was a mass murder of millions that took place in the mid 1940’s, that changed the lives of so many. ("The Holocaust") Night, is a memoir by Elie Wiesel that describes his experience as a teenager struggling to survive in concentration camps during the Holocaust. (Wiesel, 2006)
It is estimated around 6 million Jews died during the Holocaust, each death leaving a scar on modern history, each death showing the monsters we all can be to our own people, or just revealing the monsters we truly are. Harsh changes were put on the Jews from the loss of basic human rights like freedom to the loss of lives. This inhumane treatment was done by their own kind, no sympathy, no empathy,
Trial Decision This trial of President Harry S Truman attempts to malign him as a war criminal after the role he played in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As Commander in Chief during World War II, President Truman made the final decision in whether the atomic bombs should or should not be dropped to put an end to Japanese resistance and bring the second world war to a close. It is being called into question whether the Japanese’s unwillingness to surrender called for such a severe response from the United States.
The Nuremberg Trials began three years later after the most relevant Nazi authorities were convicted of war crimes for four judges, who took legal decisions that previewed sterilization policies and ethnic cleansing in Hitler 's Germany. Judgement at Nuremberg, based on the real Case Katzenberger, is a demonstration of the efforts of a judge at the tribunal to determine how the defendants, and even also the German themselves, could have been involved in the Holocaust’s atrocities. Judgment at Nuremberg is a representation of the first trial, that is mainly based on justice principles and international law, of the country leaders that pursued threatening battles and were involved in crimes against humanity. This film is an overview of real events that highlights the conflict between morality enclosing both the behaviour of the defendants and the process of providing them with justice (Teach With Movies, 2015). These processes offered the opportunity of enhancing the debate between positivism and natural law, highlighting that the position taken would have significant consequences
Otto Adolf Eichmann was one of the most important members of the Nazi Party who was accused of crimes against the Jewish people and humanity during World War 2. After the war, he went to Argentina to escape prosecution but was captured there by Israeli agents and was transferred to Israel to be judged. During the trial, Eichmann’s defense was based on Kant’s duty-based ethical theory and categorical Imperative since he overstated many times that he was only following orders. By enouncing Kantian ethical theory, Eichmann acquitted himself from moral guilt. Kant’s categorical imperative as known as The Formula Of The End