Natural science is based on the experiment: it tests whether the action, which is carried out during the experiment, obeys the hypothesis. As in the example before, we saw that the whole concept of the electromagnetism was based on the passive observation of H.C Oersted and the active experiment. But in order to produce knowledge, a scientist has to do more than just observing how something behaves during when he does the
With active experimentation the individual will display his or her response in an effort to receive a response that will confirm or falsify the theory. So we can conclude that passive observation and active experimentation are integrative forms of knowledge. However, other forms of producing knowledge exist as well. People use faith to shape knowledge and come
In a broader sense, this gives much detail as to what extent is anthropology a science. What further proof should be put on the table that indeed anthropology is a science? A science need not be a “natural science” to be classified as a science. By natural science I mean any of the sciences (as physics, chemistry, or biology) that deal with matter, energy, and their interrelations and transformations or with objectively measurable phenomena. This does not entirely define a science, regardless of its magnitude.
Plus their is a question of the ethics and how the clones will be treated by their creators. Most experiments performed come under three guidelines as to why the experiment was done or even considered. The first is utilitarian motivation, the scientist believes that it can be used for the greater good of man and solve whatever problem is at hand. The second is curiosity-driven, the scientist is wondering the basis of life and how it was created. The third is wealth generation, the scientist and the company want another way to make money, whether it is from a new product or a modified version of a current product.
They need to internalise and develop science concepts successively. This normally happens when students are capable of investigating and searching for solutions on these scientific notions. Scientific inquiry approach allows students to explore, observe, analyse, and question current studies, to which will leads them to develop a deeper understanding of certain concepts. Smith et. al., (2007) state that inquiry requires “the identification of assumptions, use of critical and logical thinking and consideration of alternative explanations.” Thus, all students, regardless of their abilities, need to be motivated and interested in order to develop better attitudes to succeed in the content area of science.
The following essay will attempt to answer the Knowledge Question “To what extent can passive observation and active experimentation be used to ‘produce’ knowledge?” through the lens of mainly the Human Sciences and Natural Sciences as Areas of Knowledge as well as ways of knowing such as deductive and inducting reasoning. Before beginning the analysis, it is important to identify and explore the key terms the question entails. Active experimentation is most commonly associated with the Natural Sciences and refers to controlled experimentation wherein experimenters can have a human subject or animal subject perform a trial or answer questions. One often relates this to the conception of an absolute or concrete answer attained by careful first
Engaging in scientific method means you will have to observe. Through observation, an idea has been formulated already but still needs more research about it. Only then, you can form a hypothesis regarding all the collected data. To test the hypothesis' credibility is through experiment. If the results did align with the hypothesis, only then will it be considered as a verified data.
“There are only two ways in which humankind can produce knowledge: through passive observation or through active experiment.” To what extend do you agree with this statement? While looking at ways that humankind can produce knowledge for different areas of knowledge and using different ways of knowing, we will see that there are more ways to produce knowledge, but it is very much dependant on one's interpretation and perspective of the production of knowledge. The production of knowledge could be seen as a process that is only possible through passive observation and active experimentation, in for example the natural sciences and human sciences where sense perception is a key way of knowing that is used to produce the knowledge. How ever there maybe more ways of producing knowledge if we take a different approach and take a look Ethics, Religious knowledge systems or the Art, and ways of knowing such as imagination, intuition, and faith. SubKQ: To what extend can we see imagination as a way of producing knowledge, without it being a result of observation or physical interaction?
On the other hand there is the investigation and observation of the scientific method, a logical and intricate process of research that identifies new insights and provides a framework to test their authenticity. In this essay I will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of each approach and come to a conclusion about which is a more valuable tool to modern day psychology. Karl Popper (July 1902 - September
Empirical means that this knowledge is gained through the process of testing. Systematic has notion as acquiring of the knowledge is done through consecutive procedures. The definition of scientific method mentioned in the handbook of the 2013 educational curriculum implementation is a method which refers to investigating techniques on certain or some phenomena or symptoms, gaining new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. In other word, a scientific method is a method of inquiry based on proofs which can be observed, empirical, and measurable by means of specific reasoning principles. Therefore, scientific methods generally contain set of activities including data collection through observation or experiments, information or data processing, analyzing, and