What the article is saying is that if you take away the handgun of a citizen who has done no harm, and when there is a need for the protection of your family and they have no gun then they have nothing else to do but hide and hope the criminal does not find them before the police come. In conclusion, Gun Control can be good in many different ways, until it interferes with the protection of someone else's life or family. To understand gun control more it is important to know about the laws passed, pros, and cons. The laws that were passed play an important role in Gun control and they can help the crime rates with guns go down. Gun Control can do its job with interfering with law abiding gun owners as little as possible.
Gun control is the controlling of firearms in the United States. It has been irritating people for years and it needs to get settled with the right people. Is gun control good? Yes it is good. In my research I have found that the more gun control we have the fewer casualties we have.
In addition, there are opposing views. The strongest one is that guns can be used for self-defense in order to protect the rights of citizens. Adversely, controlling guns stricter does not against the right of citizens to defend themselves, but hopes that the way of self-defense could be variable and do not always rely on guns. More importantly, the stricter control over the guns could make many citizens obtain the senses of security and lead them a comfortable life. The gun should be controlled stricter in order to leading all the citizens a better
In states where “the right to bear arms is” practiced, “it reduces the demand for a police state” and “when people are incapable of protecting themselves, they become either victims of the criminals or dependents of the state” by using resources that would otherwise not be needed (Levy). Having firearms allows us to protect ourselves, leading to less need for police. Gun control will prevent citizens from being able to protect themselves, leading to more resources used by the police and state. Many people who would need to protect themselves would not be able to if the repressing laws of gun control were allowed to be passed. Effects of “gun control keeps guns out of the hands of… the people who are most in need of self defense” and protection (Cottrol).
While the intent of creation of the tools may differ the use of said tools by a minority should not decide the fate of the masses. Gun-control is a debate that will continue into the future and well past our expiration dates, we may never see a true answer, but that doesn 't mean it shouldn 't be talked about. There are solid arguments to both sides of the coin such as laws, gun free zones and the morality of guns themselves, each with their own merits. The fact remains that no matter what society decides to do unless the world joins in the effort criminals will find a way to acquire these tools and use them. When and if that day comes I want to have something to protect myself and my children against any
Bump stocks are another point of interest for gun control supporters. A bump stock is an attachable stock to a firearm that simulates automatic fire by using the recoil of the gun to aid in successively pulling the trigger to increase fire rate. Gun control supporters are trying to get a ban on these attachments because they do not feel like civilians should have the power to own anything like an automatic weapon “He said he wanted the Department of Justice to ‘propose regulations that ban all devices that turn legal weapons into machine guns.’” Another focus is magazine size restriction. Advocates for gun control believe that 30 rounds is high capacity and any firearm should not be allowed to hold more than around 10 rounds. These are only a few of the things the supporters of gun control want to
Gun control has a dangerous track record; it has been seen to cause the death of millions of people, and the unrightful hostile takeover of basic freedoms of innocent citizens. Throughout history gun control has been introduced many times in foreign countries for the sole purpose of disarming, and threatening its own citizens. For example, in Nazi Germany, Jews were forbidden to purchase or own any firearms. Unable to defend themselves Adolf Hitler ordered the murder of over six million Jewish citizens. (Polsby 21) This same technique can also be seen in Turkey.
What does gun control actually control? People should use guns properly; it’s a privilege to be able to own a gun. Getting to hunt and shoot guns are something Americans shouldn’t take for granted. Much of the evidence law enforcement agencies have reinforces evidence that stricter gun laws can be part of the solution. Stricter laws can be enforced, but America has to make sure everyone abides by the laws.
Supporting detail: With gun control, the usage of the gun is being reduce. So that, the percentage to have crime with gun is being reduce too. Limited owners of guns in gun control also should be a very effective way to reduce the crime rates. Due to people have no right to own a gun, many firearm cases such as mass shooting, firearm robbery, and shooting in lost minded can be avoided. Example: Australia is a very successful example.
They can cause death and harm a lot of things and can be used to defend and protect or to threaten and kill. Either way guns are very powerful. So why is gun control such a big debate? In order to answer that we have to look at statistics of gun ownership and death because of guns. All US households own at least one gun, nearly