What is the difference between Confederation vs. Constitution? Confederation was the original 13 states of the United States of America constituted under the Articles of Confederation and superseded by the more formal union established in 1789 (2014). The Articles of Confederation was the first successful effort of organizing and mobilizing the original thirteen colonies of the United States (July 2, 2014). America was prior to this deemed subversive to the Crown of England viewed pretty much the same was a todays terrorism. Constitution can mean "make laws" and a constitution is a "how-to" document for a government or organization (2014).
The constitution was created as a strong central government. The articles created a weak central
…show more content…
Voting power was delegated between the states. Committees of two to seven people each voted on the Confederation were as the constitution allowed singe votes.
The United States was weak and was unable to seek the assistance of the other foreign governments making them weak against the British. Confederation in each state only had one vote in the congress, regardless of the size, the congress didn’t have the power to tax or to interstate commerce. They had no executive branch to enforce any of acts that were passed by the congress. Amendments to the Article of Confederation required limited voting on how many people were able to vote (July 2, 2014). The laws required a 9/13 was the requirement for the law to pass in congress.
The American Constitution was adopted in 1789 and this replace the Confederation permanently. This was a more expansive system of governance. This created the checks and balances amongst the three branches of government. This helped with the relationship of the Federal Government and the states. The Bill of Rights was then established the first ten amendments of the Constitution. This gave forth the foundation for civil liberties we enjoy as American
…show more content…
This started change that would continue to change from year to year. If we had to choose between Constitution or Confederation I would choose Confederation we would be allowed to have more freedom as well as britain ,we would be able to become less involved with the government or their colonies, it was time consuming and expensive. It was time for the colonies to become more independent with each other. If we had the rights with Confederation our colonies would be able to grow new railroads and roads, which cost a great deal of money. They’re pros and cons with Confederation for an example it would give us more freedom but at the same its a con because we would have more taxes and more money then have to pay
After the outbreak of the Revolutionary War, thirteen American colonies desired a government to displace and overturn the rule of British. So, they attempted to establish a governance of the Article of Confederation. As the first written constitution of the United States, the Articles of Confederation was not faultless. The Articles formed a weak central government and a loose confederation of sovereign states, leaving most of the power and independence with the state governments. Although the document gave Congress authority to make treaties, coin money and maintain army force, the central government still lacked of ability to implement these rules (Foner, 1991).
Paige Balestrieri January 1st, 2017 Honors US History I Period 1 Chapter 9 Alternative Assessment Answers The Articles Of Confederation had many weak components to it. With those weaknesses, the one that stood out was how all power rested within the states.
When the United States first was established, there had to be laws created in order to have a good system. The United States has been operated under two constitutions. The first written constitution that we adopted was The Articles of Confederation, that began in March 1, 1781. It was established among the 13 original states of the United States and it served as an agreement and the first constitution. After the articles had been ratified, the states stayed independent and sovereign, with Congress filling in if all else fails on interest of debate.
A convention based out of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on May 25, 1787 was called for the purpose of amending the Articles of Confederation. Confident to construct a new government from the ground up. Wouldn’t have been possible without the aid of the fifty-five delegates. The delegates pushed though despite their differences in opinions. Outlining our new government took well over a quarter of the year.
Requirements to pass a law or amendment to the Articles were way too strict and lead to little actually happening because unanimity was rarely had between all the states. Every single state had to approve of an amendment for the Articles, which was virtually impossible because of how different each state's beliefs were. Also, nine out of thirteen states had to approve of new laws, which was much easier, but still created a very weak federal government. These harsh requirements created a stalemate much of the time because one state would be a holdout, or only eight states would vote for a new law, it just was not a great system. Additionally, each state was given a single vote despite the population.
The Constitution has created a strong national Federal Government. When compared to the government under the Articles of Confederation, the current Federal Government has a greater amount of power and reduced chances of becoming tyrannical. The government under the Articles
The Articles of Confederation had many things that it could not do, things that were needed in order to have a strong central government. For example, the federal government could decide to wage war, however they had no national army to fight and the states were responsible to gather their own militias. A good example of this is Shays Rebellion. Led by Daniel Shays- a Massachusetts farmer and a war veteran- a group of farmers went to the Springfield Arsenal as
The Articles of Confederation were so different from the constitution. For example, The Articles of Confederation only had one branch of government called congress, while the constitution 3 branches. These branches are the Legislative branch, the Judicial branch, and the Executive branch. These
The Articles of Confederation were written, ratified, and put into power in the years 1781-1789. The Articles of Confederation served as a written plan of government for the newly united 13 colonies. This gave the states a strong government power with a weak central government. This is because most colonists still had the idea that a strong central power for government would turn into a tyranny just like Great Britain. However, the Articles of Confederation failed due to many problems in the early colonies.
The Articles of Confederation had a very weak central government so the rights of the people would be secure. The Articles of Confederation was ratified by
The Articles of Confederation were a document seen as the “first” constitution of the United States. This document granted the new national government power to control the military, declare war, and create treaties between the states. However, the Articles had holes in it considering the government did not have the power to tax, create laws without at least nine states’ approval, or change the Articles of Confederation without a unanimous vote. This means that the country soon fell into debt and petty arguments between state, the new government had no control. It was time for a change.
Articles of Confederation vs. U.S. Constitution The Articles of the Confederation and the U.S. Constitution are two articles that where written and accepted by the United States as a foundation for their new government. They are both very important documents that have similarities and differences. Some of the main things the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution have in common is that they addressed the needs of its constituencies.
They hoped to create a better government. The Constitution replaced the Article of Confederation permanently in March 4, 1789. The Constitution created checks and balances between the three branches. It also, established the Bill of Rights, and the first ten amendments of the constitution. The Constitution had to be ratified by at least nine states out of thirteen.
These authorities that the national government should have, were all up to the states to decide under the Articles. With the taking away some of the states rights in the Constitution, Anti-federalists feared that this would leave the states too weak, resulting in more problems. Under the new Constitution, many powers that were now in the government 's hands are: the power to levy and collect taxes, the power to regulate interstate commerce, the government set up a national court system consisting of district, circuit, and a supreme court, the government could enforce laws, there was now a house based on population, and a senate based on equal representation (two votes per state), to amend the Constitution, a ⅔ vote of Congress was needed, and a ¾ vote of the states were needed, and a majority rule was needed to pass bills. These new powers and abilities of the national government helped to create a strong, new
The new government, the Constitution, is now able to enforces taxes, which allowed money to come in and the government was able to pay off their debt. One other weakness of the articles was that it gave all power to only one house of representative from each state, the constitution try to solve this matter that creating three separate branches of power, the Legislative branch, Executive branch, and the Judiciary branch, allowing the power to be more divided. Representation was another problem in under the Articles of Confederation because a big state like Massachusetts and a small state like New Jersey both have the same amount of representatives, the Constitution made a compromise by forming two house in Congress the Senate, where each state get equal representation, and the House of Representatives, where each state is represented by the population of the state. The Constitution also fixed the problem of passing a law; under the Articles of Confederation, laws can only be passed if 9 out of 13 representatives agrees on the law because of this not much laws were passed, now under the Constitution only 51 percent of the votes to pass the law. From this readers can infer that the Constitution fixed many of the defects in the Articles