Popper's Theory Of Evolution

1204 Words5 Pages
Creationism is not a science. Creationists refute the theory of evolution because they believe that all things were created by a Creator. This means they do not believe that things have gradually evolved and developed over time. Their argument is based on two aspects. In popular usage, a theory is a well-supported explanation that was acquired through significant scientific testing that was confirmed through observation and experimentation. A fact is direct observations of the world around us. A fact does not disappear or change when scientists debate about it, but it does not mean complete certainty. Evolution is both a theory and a fact. From the beginning evolutionists have easily distinguished fact from theory. This is similar to how they…show more content…
No biologist has ever been led to think that evolution does not occur, but the debate is about how in fact evolution occurs or the mechanism. Creationists disagrees with the theory of evolution all together. They believe that the universe was created by acts of divine creation and did not come about through natural life processes. Their main argument follows the Popperian model to attempt to falsify evolution by presenting contradictions. In using Popper’s model, the argument must work and apply in both directions to falsify evolution. Scientific creationism is contradictory phrase that is unable to be proven wrong. Creationists are still unsure of many things such as: how the Creator was created, what processes He used to create the universe, or if he used processes that are still currently being used anywhere naturally in the universe. Creationists claim that they are unable to investigate or research the methods the Creator used. There are three general arguments that evolution has occurred. First, he pointed out evolution within a species. This is undeniable because of many examples such as the many strains of bacteria that now contain antibiotic…show more content…
Creationists refute the theory of evolution because they believe that all things were created by a Creator. This means they do not believe that things have gradually evolved and developed over time. Their argument is based on two aspects. In popular usage, a theory is a well-supported explanation that was acquired through significant scientific testing that was confirmed through observation and experimentation. A fact is direct observations of the world around us. A fact does not disappear or change when scientists debate about it, but it does not mean complete certainty. Evolution is both a theory and a fact. From the beginning evolutionists have easily distinguished fact from theory. This is similar to how they have always admitted how far we are for understanding the mechanism of evolution, or observed changes in organisms over time. Darwin affirmed the existence of evolution, but he declared natural selection as provisional. Since Darwin proposed the theory of evolution debate has not ended, although he never completely enjoyed his great affluence due to death. Gould reminds the people that both sides are just trying to explain the same concept. There are two evolutionary theories. One involves Species character states change by the slow and continuous accumulation of mutations favored by natural selection, which is what Darwin proposed. The other theory involves species change very little in structure over time but when change does occur it
Open Document