pious vs. impious
Euthyphro – going against his father for murder
Meletus – against socrates for corrupting the youth. Accuses him of being a neologian, makes new gods, denies old ones.
Ministration – the provision of assistance, or care
Husbandman – person who cultivates land, a farmer
Does god say things that are good, or do things become good because god says them?
If god is impotent, god doesn 't define the rules, he just reads them to us. God isn 't required for morality, morality would exist if god died. If god has to follow morality, then his omnipotence is limited and he must not be all powerful.
If god is the dictator of all things that are good, then if god sends a hurricane to kill a bunch of people, that would be good? No
Not completely satisfied by Euthyphro’s definition that, “Piety, then, is that which is dear to the gods”, Socrates pointed out that gods were known to disagree and argue; therefore, they may not have had unified opinion on what is holy. To further frustrate Euthyphro, Socrates continued his argument by asking the following question, “Holy is beloved by the gods because it’s
Jonathan Edwards’s “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” was a sermon that was given during the year of 1741 in the time of The Great Awakening. Seeing that The Great Awakening was an evangelistic movement, Edwards used this speech to preach to people able God and Hell. In this speech, Jonathon described characteristics of a person who did not obey the rules and God and said that these types of people would go to Hell. He made Hell sound so terrible that it was like the people could not comprehend the thought of what Hell was like. With me being a Southern Baptist, I agree with the points Edwards preaches about.
In Euthyphro, Plato’s method of arguing obliviously proves the point that evidence and a clear thought out explanation is needed when trying to describe and explain the difference between two things—especially when involving right and wrong. Although it helps to prove it and make you truly think about the definitions as well as how to describe it, for the person, in this case Euthyphro, on the other side of the argument it can be very annoying; because you explain one thing and then are questioned and have to explain more or then you being to questioned on your own thinking making you have to restart. It is in a way similar to now how little kids go through a phase were they ask “why” to anything and everything; typically the one being questioned
God decided to test Abraham and told him to take his only son, Isaac, to the land of Moriah and offer him as a sacrifice. Abraham followed God’s instructions and as he was about to kill his only son, God stopped him because He now realized that Abraham is a God fearing man. God said “By myself I have sworn, says the Lord: Because you have not withheld your son, your only son, I will indeed bless you, and I will make your offspring as numerous as the stars of heaven and as the send that is on the seashore. And your offspring shall possess the gate of their enemies, and by your offspring shall all the nations of the earth gain blessing for themselves, because you have obeyed my voice” (Genesis 22:16-19). God called Abraham to be a blessing unto
For the individuals who are searching for a tasteful meaning of devotion, the discourse is a failure, for no conclusion has been come to concerning the exact idea of that goodness. It has now and again been kept up that the genuine motivation behind logic isn't to answer addresses yet rather scrutinize the appropriate responses that have been given. Anyways, this is precisely what Socrates has been doing in this back and forth. Euthyphro has displayed a few speedy and prepared responses to the inquiry "What is devotion?" however upon magnification, each of these questions has appeared to be unsuitable.
Biblical scholar and author, Phyllis Trible, in her book Texts of Terror: Literary-Feminist Readings of Biblical Narratives, brings to the forefront the often forgotten tale of Hagar, the Egyptian slave woman, to demonstrate an ulterior method of viewing God, the bible, and religion. Through her examination of the objectification and oppression that Hagar encounters from God, Trible proves validity in her claim that Hagar’s story holds great significance within both the Old Testament and contemporary society and the women of modern day. The phrase, thought, and belief “God is good” is common within religions that hold sacred the Old Testament. People often assume that their God works to benefit and comfort all of His human creations.
Everyone can have a different ideas about what the gods love or the gods hate. Another thing that could be argued is what is truly the definition of holy and unholy, again people are going to differ. Euthyphro’s third definition is partially stronger than the second but it still raises the same negative questions and differences in opinion and Socrates brings up in his
HUM2225 Dr. Hotchkiss September 30, 2016 Moral Insight Plato’s Euthyphro is based on a lesson between Socrates and Euthyphro outside of the Athenian court about the definition of pious or impious. Euthyphro was surprised to see Socrates there and even more curious to find out why he was there. Socrates explained that the court was persecuting him for impiety because Meletus was spreading rumors about him corrupting the Athenian youth. Euthyphro explains to Socrates that he was there to prosecute his father for murdering a farm worker named Dionysus.
In his powerful dialogue “Euthyphro”, Plato utilizes a simple conversation between Socrates and Euthyphro pertaining to the definition of piety to argue that Euthyphro is not the expert in religion that he appears to be. Euthyphro defines holiness in ways such as indicting religious criminals, as something being supported by all the gods, as a form of fairness, and as an exchange between a person and a god. Euthyphro states that holiness is indicting religious criminals, although Socrates finds this response disagreeable because of the fact that there are countless acts that can be considered holy. Euthyphro then goes on to declare that holiness is simply something that is approved of by all the gods, although Socrates questions this statement
Free-will is arguably the greater good; we would not be humans without it and we would not be a good creation without choice over our own actions. In protection of that greater good, God does not, and should not, get involved in dealing with moral evil and the suffering caused by it. Doing so would subvert our free-will, and ultimately take away our free-will. Since we have the choice whether to do good or evil, God should not be blamed for the actions that humans make. Following from this, God can still be omniscient (God knows that there is evil in the world), omnipotent (God has the ability to stop evil) and omnibenevolent (God does not want evil to exist, but ultimately allows it for our ability to have free-will).
Thomas Aquinas’s essay The Doctrine of Analogy he states that words should be take analogously when referring to God, just as the word ‘healthy’ can be used to describe medicine or urine; medicine being the cause of a healthy man, and urine being a sign of a healthy animal. According to St. Tomas Aquinas, “Nothing can be predicated of a creature and of God univocally, For when a term is used univocally of more than one thing, what the term signifies is common to each of the things of which it is univocally predicated.” But the word good can have more than one meaning, whereas healthy cannot. Healthy can be related to two different things as can good. In both the urine example and the medicine example the word ‘healthy’ is used to mean the same thing but to imply to different things; urinating as a sign an animal is healthy and taking medicine to become healthy, but healthy in both sayings are pointing to things that mean to be in reasonable health.
There are multiple emotions that are shown by people when a loved one, friend, or family dies. The most common emotions are thoroughly shown in the painting The Death of Socrates by David and “The Death Scene” from The Phaedo by Plato. Although they bear some minor differences, the similarities in the way they express the emotions between The Death of Socrates by David and “The Death Scene” from The Phaedo by Plato are evident. The emotion that is thoroughly shown throughout both works is sadness.
Hello Sir I have a question about the connection between God’s existence and morality. The Euthyphro dilemma summarizes Kant’s argument. Our motivation to obey God’s commands are either moral or not. If moral then the moral motivation to obey God precedes God’s command.
Aristophanes and Sappho share parallels when speaking about the importance of erotic love. They both describe love as powerful, and speak about the influence it has on our happiness. Furthermore, Aristophanes and Sappho highlight how natural love is and that it should be sought after because of the happiness associated with being in a relationship. One could argue that Aristophanes and Sappho’s shared similar ideologies when it comes to sexuality. Sappho promotes homosexuality through her love of women, while through his speech Aristophanes identifies it as being a form of natural love.
During the discussion regarding physical training for the guardians, the question of how to deal with sick people is raised. Adopting the position of Asclepius, Socrates concludes, “But as for the ones whose bodies are naturally unhealthy or whose souls are incurably evil, won’t they let the former die of their own accord and put the latter to death?” (86) Overall, Socrates advocates death for both groups mainly because they will not be able to contribute to the city. For the fatally ill, they will be so focused on treating themselves, they will not be able to work, and per Socrates, not be able to truly live either. On the other hand, Socrates believes that the “incurably evil”, or psychopaths, should be purged from the city as means of keeping