They claimed that exerting indirect influence was not only time-consuming but also ineffective in enacting social reforms. With the vote, suffragists argued, it would be easier for women to oppose corrupt government practices and win social reforms (Kauffman). Women began to argue that with the opinion of women throughout the country, the government would advance. Men and women have a difference in opinion so having both involved in the government they could avoid future corruption and bad decision making. Women have a lot of different qualities than men so adding those to the government system would help the
The resulting hypothesis is that women will be judged by male and female survey takers more harshly. This could maybe have the effect of causing women to be more tolerant towards each other and thus make them to judge female politicians involved in scandals less harshly. The hypothesis just mentioned is based on Taifel´s Minimal Group paradigm in which it is said that group affiliation might be a basic custom in human behaviour. The result of it is the group favouritism effect. However, this could be moderated by the System justification Theory, which says that in-group bias is weaker among low status groups, as they rationalise their low status and then discriminate against their own group.
Role of Women in Ancient Empires Throughout the modern world, we mention the concept of equality between men and women and try to equalize their positions in society. It is illogical for women to ask and try to prove that they are equal with men because equality is something that are already given to humanity, but contradicting the role of women by men is what created the gap between them. By looking at history, we can say that accomplishing that goal of making their position equal is not easy. Whenever we start reading a historical context or myth, it is obvious that the role of women is not considered as important compared to men, and women won glory that time when they are mentioned in the arguments the least. If there are women that are mentioned as protagonist, the women usually are described because of their 'outrageous behavior '.
It’s the 21st century, a time where all would believe that equality among the sexes has finally achieved. This is far from the case, women and men aren’t seen as equals in society and there is numerous ways to prove this. From how one should act based on their sex to how women have to pay more for products and services. That’s right, women have to pay more for the same products and services as men. This is called the Pink Tax, the extra amount that women are charged for products and services.
She noted that women were not effectively succeeding up the bureaucratic ladder into leadership positions but on the conflicting, were almost always limited to the lower levels. As a generous feminist, Kanter said that if the playing fields are equal, women will be able to compete with men on an equal basis and will be just as capable of being successful and leading in the play field. Kanter believed that people who are stuck can be offered challenges. The powerless can be given more choices, more help over decisions. If it is organizational structure rather than intrinsic character that determines organizational behaviour, then self-defeating, self-perpetuating cycles can be
Logos is presented in various ways such as statistics or even just logical thinking. Pollitt’s logical thinking is placed when she explains that Nancy Chodorow, a difference feminist who believes that naturally women are relational and men are autonomous, is wrong when analyzing the real world. Pollitt states, “If Chodorow is right relational women and autonomous men should be the norm, but are they?” (404). Pollitt is informing us that it is clear that we all seen men and women who do not follow such criteria. Readers can see and relate with Pollitt’s idea, and realize the logical reasoning behind it.
Employers biasedly view female dominated jobs as less valuable and therefore set lower wages. She attests that these views stem from American societies general devaluation of femininity (153). To support this claim England discusses how throughout the last century it has become acceptable for women to adopt male traits and practices, but not vice versa. “But even as women integrated employment and “male” professional and managerial jobs, the part of feminism challenging the devaluation of traditionally female activities and jobs made little headway” (162). Because of this devaluation and “female” occupation’s lower wages, men have little to no incentive to break into fields such as nursing and teaching.
. Women are currently at a disadvantaged with respect to rights, compared with men such as respect and such conditions According to dictionary.com Feminism can be defined as a doctrine or movement that advocates equal rights for women. Feminism is both an intellectual commitment and a political movement that seeks justice for women and targets the end of sexism in all forms. However, there are many different kinds of feminism such as radical feminism, socialist feminism, cultural feminism, and liberal feminism. In today society Feminists ought to disagree about what sexism consists in, and what exactly to be done about it.
Contribution History places limitations of learning women’s contributions to history because monographs are not of what women really did,but what men in society thought women should do.Thus, it is evident with such limitations that another form of history is necessary to better understand women in history. What is "transitional history", and do you think it is a more complete/comprehensive way of doing
Whether he wants it or no." (Huxley 186 ) . This proves that sexually, women have equal if not more power than men. As the reader evaluates Huxley’s Brave New World and issues that it poses as a reflection of Huxley’s time, the reader must look at his own world and evaluate if these issues have vanished. The issues of conditioning, social and economic class, and the role of women are pronounced in Brave New World .